{"title":"二值分类器性能指标分析","authors":"Charles Parker","doi":"10.1109/ICDM.2011.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"If one is given two binary classifiers and a set of test data, it should be straightforward to determine which of the two classifiers is the superior. Recent work, however, has called into question many of the methods heretofore accepted as standard for this task. In this paper, we analyze seven ways of determining if one classifier is better than another, given the same test data. Five of these are long established and two are relative newcomers. We review and extend work showing that one of these methods is clearly inappropriate, and then conduct an empirical analysis with a large number of datasets to evaluate the real-world implications of our theoretical analysis. Both our empirical and theoretical results converge strongly towards one of the newer methods.","PeriodicalId":106216,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE 11th International Conference on Data Mining","volume":"200 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"53","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Analysis of Performance Measures for Binary Classifiers\",\"authors\":\"Charles Parker\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICDM.2011.21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"If one is given two binary classifiers and a set of test data, it should be straightforward to determine which of the two classifiers is the superior. Recent work, however, has called into question many of the methods heretofore accepted as standard for this task. In this paper, we analyze seven ways of determining if one classifier is better than another, given the same test data. Five of these are long established and two are relative newcomers. We review and extend work showing that one of these methods is clearly inappropriate, and then conduct an empirical analysis with a large number of datasets to evaluate the real-world implications of our theoretical analysis. Both our empirical and theoretical results converge strongly towards one of the newer methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":106216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 IEEE 11th International Conference on Data Mining\",\"volume\":\"200 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"53\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 IEEE 11th International Conference on Data Mining\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDM.2011.21\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 IEEE 11th International Conference on Data Mining","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDM.2011.21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
An Analysis of Performance Measures for Binary Classifiers
If one is given two binary classifiers and a set of test data, it should be straightforward to determine which of the two classifiers is the superior. Recent work, however, has called into question many of the methods heretofore accepted as standard for this task. In this paper, we analyze seven ways of determining if one classifier is better than another, given the same test data. Five of these are long established and two are relative newcomers. We review and extend work showing that one of these methods is clearly inappropriate, and then conduct an empirical analysis with a large number of datasets to evaluate the real-world implications of our theoretical analysis. Both our empirical and theoretical results converge strongly towards one of the newer methods.