内容保护系统中的广播加密与公钥加密

J. Lotspiech
{"title":"内容保护系统中的广播加密与公钥加密","authors":"J. Lotspiech","doi":"10.1145/1655048.1655055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Broadcast encryption and public-key cryptography are two competing key management schemes. Both are in use today, although public key is much more pervasive (pervasive in the number of systems, not necessarily in the number of devices). In certain applications, especially the content protection or \"Digital Rights Management\" application, broadcast encryption seems to offer real advantages. In the last two or three years, advances have been made which offer new functionality to broadcast-encryption systems: a \"signature-like\" function, a device authentication protocol, \"unified media key blocks\" enhancing forensics, and \"security classes\". These new advances are summarized in this paper. The device authentication protocol has not previously been described in the academic literature, although it has been proposed in commercial systems.\n The author believes the reason that broadcast encryption has not been used more frequently in content protection is more due to system designers being unfamiliar with it, and less due to any advantages of public-key cryptography. The author hopes that this paper might begin to reverse this trend.","PeriodicalId":124354,"journal":{"name":"ACM Digital Rights Management Workshop","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Broadcast encryption versus public key cryptography in content protection systems\",\"authors\":\"J. Lotspiech\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1655048.1655055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Broadcast encryption and public-key cryptography are two competing key management schemes. Both are in use today, although public key is much more pervasive (pervasive in the number of systems, not necessarily in the number of devices). In certain applications, especially the content protection or \\\"Digital Rights Management\\\" application, broadcast encryption seems to offer real advantages. In the last two or three years, advances have been made which offer new functionality to broadcast-encryption systems: a \\\"signature-like\\\" function, a device authentication protocol, \\\"unified media key blocks\\\" enhancing forensics, and \\\"security classes\\\". These new advances are summarized in this paper. The device authentication protocol has not previously been described in the academic literature, although it has been proposed in commercial systems.\\n The author believes the reason that broadcast encryption has not been used more frequently in content protection is more due to system designers being unfamiliar with it, and less due to any advantages of public-key cryptography. The author hopes that this paper might begin to reverse this trend.\",\"PeriodicalId\":124354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Digital Rights Management Workshop\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Digital Rights Management Workshop\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1655048.1655055\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Digital Rights Management Workshop","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1655048.1655055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

广播加密和公钥加密是两种相互竞争的密钥管理方案。这两种方法目前都在使用,尽管公钥更为普遍(在系统数量上普遍,而不一定在设备数量上普遍)。在某些应用程序中,特别是内容保护或“数字版权管理”应用程序,广播加密似乎提供了真正的优势。在过去的两三年里,已经取得了一些进步,为广播加密系统提供了新的功能:“类似签名”的功能、设备认证协议、增强取证的“统一媒体密钥块”和“安全等级”。本文对这些新进展进行了综述。设备认证协议以前没有在学术文献中描述,尽管它已经在商业系统中提出。笔者认为,广播加密在内容保护中没有得到更广泛的应用,更多的是由于系统设计者对其不熟悉,而不是由于公钥加密的任何优势。作者希望本文可以开始扭转这一趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Broadcast encryption versus public key cryptography in content protection systems
Broadcast encryption and public-key cryptography are two competing key management schemes. Both are in use today, although public key is much more pervasive (pervasive in the number of systems, not necessarily in the number of devices). In certain applications, especially the content protection or "Digital Rights Management" application, broadcast encryption seems to offer real advantages. In the last two or three years, advances have been made which offer new functionality to broadcast-encryption systems: a "signature-like" function, a device authentication protocol, "unified media key blocks" enhancing forensics, and "security classes". These new advances are summarized in this paper. The device authentication protocol has not previously been described in the academic literature, although it has been proposed in commercial systems. The author believes the reason that broadcast encryption has not been used more frequently in content protection is more due to system designers being unfamiliar with it, and less due to any advantages of public-key cryptography. The author hopes that this paper might begin to reverse this trend.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信