证据推理的可选组合规则

Faouzi Sebbak, F. Benhammadi, M'hamed Mataoui, Sofiane Bouznad, Y. Amirat
{"title":"证据推理的可选组合规则","authors":"Faouzi Sebbak, F. Benhammadi, M'hamed Mataoui, Sofiane Bouznad, Y. Amirat","doi":"10.5281/ZENODO.22859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to have a normal behavior in combination of bodies of evidence, this paper proposes a new combination rule. This rule includes the cardinality of focal set elements in conjunctive operation and the conflict redistribution to all steps. Based on the focal set cardinalities, the conflict redistribution is assigned using factors. The weighted factors are computed from the original and the conjunctive masses assigned to each focal element. This strategy forces the conflict redistribution in favor of the more committed hypothesis. Our method is evaluated and compared with some numerical examples reported in the literature. As result, this rule redistributes the conflict in favor of the more committed hypothesis and gives intuitive interpretation for combining multiple information sources with coherent results.","PeriodicalId":136004,"journal":{"name":"17th International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION)","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An alternative combination rule for evidential reasoning\",\"authors\":\"Faouzi Sebbak, F. Benhammadi, M'hamed Mataoui, Sofiane Bouznad, Y. Amirat\",\"doi\":\"10.5281/ZENODO.22859\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In order to have a normal behavior in combination of bodies of evidence, this paper proposes a new combination rule. This rule includes the cardinality of focal set elements in conjunctive operation and the conflict redistribution to all steps. Based on the focal set cardinalities, the conflict redistribution is assigned using factors. The weighted factors are computed from the original and the conjunctive masses assigned to each focal element. This strategy forces the conflict redistribution in favor of the more committed hypothesis. Our method is evaluated and compared with some numerical examples reported in the literature. As result, this rule redistributes the conflict in favor of the more committed hypothesis and gives intuitive interpretation for combining multiple information sources with coherent results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":136004,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"17th International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION)\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"17th International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.22859\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"17th International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.22859","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

为了在证据体组合中有一个正常的行为,本文提出了一种新的证据体组合规则。该规则包括了合算中焦点集合元素的基数性和冲突对所有步骤的重新分配。基于焦点集基数,使用因子对冲突进行再分配。加权因子由原始和每个焦点元的连接质量计算得到。这种策略迫使冲突重新分配,有利于更坚定的假设。我们的方法进行了评估,并与文献报道的一些数值例子进行了比较。因此,该规则重新分配了冲突,有利于更坚定的假设,并为将多个信息源与一致的结果结合在一起提供了直观的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An alternative combination rule for evidential reasoning
In order to have a normal behavior in combination of bodies of evidence, this paper proposes a new combination rule. This rule includes the cardinality of focal set elements in conjunctive operation and the conflict redistribution to all steps. Based on the focal set cardinalities, the conflict redistribution is assigned using factors. The weighted factors are computed from the original and the conjunctive masses assigned to each focal element. This strategy forces the conflict redistribution in favor of the more committed hypothesis. Our method is evaluated and compared with some numerical examples reported in the literature. As result, this rule redistributes the conflict in favor of the more committed hypothesis and gives intuitive interpretation for combining multiple information sources with coherent results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信