基于ros的移动机器人导航局部规划精度比较

B. Cybulski, Agnieszka Węgierska, G. Granosik
{"title":"基于ros的移动机器人导航局部规划精度比较","authors":"B. Cybulski, Agnieszka Węgierska, G. Granosik","doi":"10.1109/RoMoCo.2019.8787346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this work is to investigate and analyze the performance of ROS-based navigation local planners in a simulated environment and on a real research platform the TurtleBot 3 mobile robot. Three planners were subject to the study: DWA, EBand and TEB; the accuracy and repeatability were measured for position and orientation of the robot, as well as time of travel. Tests were based on continuous movements between three waypoints placed in a confined space, in both static and dynamic environments. The motion capture system based on AR tags was used in the real world. The obtained results do not indicate a specific comparison winner. All tested planners in most cases met their requirements.","PeriodicalId":415070,"journal":{"name":"2019 12th International Workshop on Robot Motion and Control (RoMoCo)","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy comparison of navigation local planners on ROS-based mobile robot\",\"authors\":\"B. Cybulski, Agnieszka Węgierska, G. Granosik\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RoMoCo.2019.8787346\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this work is to investigate and analyze the performance of ROS-based navigation local planners in a simulated environment and on a real research platform the TurtleBot 3 mobile robot. Three planners were subject to the study: DWA, EBand and TEB; the accuracy and repeatability were measured for position and orientation of the robot, as well as time of travel. Tests were based on continuous movements between three waypoints placed in a confined space, in both static and dynamic environments. The motion capture system based on AR tags was used in the real world. The obtained results do not indicate a specific comparison winner. All tested planners in most cases met their requirements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":415070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 12th International Workshop on Robot Motion and Control (RoMoCo)\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 12th International Workshop on Robot Motion and Control (RoMoCo)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RoMoCo.2019.8787346\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 12th International Workshop on Robot Motion and Control (RoMoCo)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RoMoCo.2019.8787346","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

摘要

本工作的目的是调查和分析基于ros的导航局部规划器在模拟环境和真实研究平台TurtleBot 3移动机器人上的性能。研究对象包括三家规划机构:市区工务局、东区工务局及东区工务局;测量了机器人的位置和方向以及行走时间的精度和重复性。测试基于放置在密闭空间中的三个路点之间的连续运动,在静态和动态环境中进行。基于AR标签的动作捕捉系统在现实世界中得到了应用。获得的结果并不表明一个特定的比较获胜者。所有经过测试的计划者在大多数情况下都满足了他们的要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Accuracy comparison of navigation local planners on ROS-based mobile robot
The aim of this work is to investigate and analyze the performance of ROS-based navigation local planners in a simulated environment and on a real research platform the TurtleBot 3 mobile robot. Three planners were subject to the study: DWA, EBand and TEB; the accuracy and repeatability were measured for position and orientation of the robot, as well as time of travel. Tests were based on continuous movements between three waypoints placed in a confined space, in both static and dynamic environments. The motion capture system based on AR tags was used in the real world. The obtained results do not indicate a specific comparison winner. All tested planners in most cases met their requirements.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信