“他是个女巫!”——《风骚女郎》中福斯特对浪荡子的神奇阉割

Mark-Elliot Finley
{"title":"“他是个女巫!”——《风骚女郎》中福斯特对浪荡子的神奇阉割","authors":"Mark-Elliot Finley","doi":"10.55880/furj2.1.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Written in 1797, Hannah Webster Foster's The Coquette exemplifies seduction and libertinism in the early American Republic. While much of the scholarship on Foster’s narrative centers on the coquette's image and consent, critics have also noted Major Peter Sanford's manipulation and control over Eliza. My paper seeks to dive deeper into Sanford’s character as I suggest Foster depicts Sanford with qualities that echo the outsider role of witches in Early America to critique his libertine image. Foster not only emasculates Sanford, but also highlights the libertine’s fallibility in the new republic and the rake’s danger to colonial society, especially in an age of fragmentation and instability. In this paper, I explore the three modes in which Foster presents Sanford as a feminized male witch: 1) as a deceiver, 2) as an outcast, and 3) as a weakened individual, attributes tied with the colonial witch. Foster’s rhetorical choice to liken Sanford to a feminized male witch has a twofold result: 1) she emasculates a seventeenth-century masculine image to stay in touch with late eighteenth-century discourses surrounding the feminization of the libertine, and 2) through Sanford’s emasculation, declares the libertine’s threat to the new Republic during an age when masculinity had altered. The feminization of the libertine is not unique to Foster; rather, her presentation of such emasculation of the rake through witchcraft terms is what makes Foster’s Major Peter Sanford so distinctive.","PeriodicalId":184758,"journal":{"name":"Florida Undergraduate Research Journal","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“He’s a Witch!”: Foster’s Magical Emasculation of the Libertine in The Coquette\",\"authors\":\"Mark-Elliot Finley\",\"doi\":\"10.55880/furj2.1.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Written in 1797, Hannah Webster Foster's The Coquette exemplifies seduction and libertinism in the early American Republic. While much of the scholarship on Foster’s narrative centers on the coquette's image and consent, critics have also noted Major Peter Sanford's manipulation and control over Eliza. My paper seeks to dive deeper into Sanford’s character as I suggest Foster depicts Sanford with qualities that echo the outsider role of witches in Early America to critique his libertine image. Foster not only emasculates Sanford, but also highlights the libertine’s fallibility in the new republic and the rake’s danger to colonial society, especially in an age of fragmentation and instability. In this paper, I explore the three modes in which Foster presents Sanford as a feminized male witch: 1) as a deceiver, 2) as an outcast, and 3) as a weakened individual, attributes tied with the colonial witch. Foster’s rhetorical choice to liken Sanford to a feminized male witch has a twofold result: 1) she emasculates a seventeenth-century masculine image to stay in touch with late eighteenth-century discourses surrounding the feminization of the libertine, and 2) through Sanford’s emasculation, declares the libertine’s threat to the new Republic during an age when masculinity had altered. The feminization of the libertine is not unique to Foster; rather, her presentation of such emasculation of the rake through witchcraft terms is what makes Foster’s Major Peter Sanford so distinctive.\",\"PeriodicalId\":184758,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Florida Undergraduate Research Journal\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Florida Undergraduate Research Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55880/furj2.1.03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Florida Undergraduate Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55880/furj2.1.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

汉娜·韦伯斯特·福斯特的《风骚女郎》写于1797年,是美国共和早期诱惑和自由主义的典范。虽然关于福斯特的叙述的大部分学术研究都集中在妖艳女郎的形象和同意上,但批评者也注意到彼得·桑福德少校对伊丽莎的操纵和控制。我的论文试图更深入地研究桑福德的性格,因为我认为福斯特将桑福德描绘成与早期美国女巫局外人角色相呼应的品质,以批评他的放荡形象。福斯特不仅阉割了桑福德,还强调了新共和国中浪子的易犯错误,以及浪子对殖民社会的危险,尤其是在一个分裂和不稳定的时代。在本文中,我探讨了福斯特将桑福德塑造成女性化的男性女巫的三种模式:1)一个骗子,2)一个被抛弃的人,3)一个被削弱的个体,这些都是与殖民女巫相关的属性。福斯特的修辞选择将桑福德比作女性化的男性女巫,有两个结果:1)她阉割了17世纪的男性形象,以保持与18世纪晚期围绕浪子女性化的话语的联系,2)通过桑福德的阉割,宣告浪子对新共和国的威胁,在一个男性化已经改变的时代。浪子的女性化并不是福斯特独有的;相反,福斯特笔下的彼得·桑福德(Peter Sanford)少校之所以与众不同,是因为她用巫术的术语来表现耙子的这种阉割。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“He’s a Witch!”: Foster’s Magical Emasculation of the Libertine in The Coquette
Written in 1797, Hannah Webster Foster's The Coquette exemplifies seduction and libertinism in the early American Republic. While much of the scholarship on Foster’s narrative centers on the coquette's image and consent, critics have also noted Major Peter Sanford's manipulation and control over Eliza. My paper seeks to dive deeper into Sanford’s character as I suggest Foster depicts Sanford with qualities that echo the outsider role of witches in Early America to critique his libertine image. Foster not only emasculates Sanford, but also highlights the libertine’s fallibility in the new republic and the rake’s danger to colonial society, especially in an age of fragmentation and instability. In this paper, I explore the three modes in which Foster presents Sanford as a feminized male witch: 1) as a deceiver, 2) as an outcast, and 3) as a weakened individual, attributes tied with the colonial witch. Foster’s rhetorical choice to liken Sanford to a feminized male witch has a twofold result: 1) she emasculates a seventeenth-century masculine image to stay in touch with late eighteenth-century discourses surrounding the feminization of the libertine, and 2) through Sanford’s emasculation, declares the libertine’s threat to the new Republic during an age when masculinity had altered. The feminization of the libertine is not unique to Foster; rather, her presentation of such emasculation of the rake through witchcraft terms is what makes Foster’s Major Peter Sanford so distinctive.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信