书评:保持怀疑,不要与阿齐兹共舞

D. Krivonos, K. Aparna
{"title":"书评:保持怀疑,不要与阿齐兹共舞","authors":"D. Krivonos, K. Aparna","doi":"10.1177/13505068231165859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Unequal Under Socialism: Race, Women, and Transnationalism in Bulgaria is a powerful guide and companion at a time when the search for emancipatory alternatives to the project of both state socialism and neoliberal capitalism is ever more urgent. It is extremely timely as it comes at a moment when keeping the focus on forms of violence that derive from both Soviet/Russian and Western imperialisms is a challenge to contemporary scholarship. It is here that Todorova’s contribution speaks from a feminist standpoint cautioning against romanticized visions of projects built around socialist and collectivist forms of economic and cultural production, pointing to gender and racial inequalities that remain unaddressed. This critique is especially directed to Marxist, materialist, and class analysis within Western academic research and education in response to the crisis of neoliberalism. However, there is a missed opportunity to dialogue with recent works of transnational feminist scholarship and collectives to whom questions of expropriation, ongoing slavery and economic inequality as part of global capitalism are already central to understanding contemporary conditions of gendered and racialized forms of violence. Making questions of race central to the enquiry about women under state socialism, Todorova introduces the notion of ‘socialist racialism’. Here, she traces affinities between modern Eurocentric epistemologies and Leninist and Marxist ideologies and socialist state formations. In situating Bulgaria as a location for such relational thinking, this examination is part of a larger recent effort to situate the Balkans and Southeast Europe within the episteme of racism and whiteness. The most exciting provocation of the book is Todorova’s relation with both socialism and capitalism as marked by a sense of doubt: an emotional and cognitive awareness that any economic, social and political formation has to be continuously critiqued, examined, distrusted and replaced (p. 5). This is the doubt that leads to unease with Marxism, socialism, capitalism, and liberalism and seeks to ‘transcend these modern Eurocentric ideologies that have arrested our imaginations and politics’ (p. 5). ‘Postsocialist feminist doubt’ 1165859 EJW0010.1177/13505068231165859European Journal of Women’s StudiesBook reviews book-review2023","PeriodicalId":312959,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Women's Studies","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book review: Staying with doubt, not yet dancing with Azis\",\"authors\":\"D. Krivonos, K. Aparna\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13505068231165859\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Unequal Under Socialism: Race, Women, and Transnationalism in Bulgaria is a powerful guide and companion at a time when the search for emancipatory alternatives to the project of both state socialism and neoliberal capitalism is ever more urgent. It is extremely timely as it comes at a moment when keeping the focus on forms of violence that derive from both Soviet/Russian and Western imperialisms is a challenge to contemporary scholarship. It is here that Todorova’s contribution speaks from a feminist standpoint cautioning against romanticized visions of projects built around socialist and collectivist forms of economic and cultural production, pointing to gender and racial inequalities that remain unaddressed. This critique is especially directed to Marxist, materialist, and class analysis within Western academic research and education in response to the crisis of neoliberalism. However, there is a missed opportunity to dialogue with recent works of transnational feminist scholarship and collectives to whom questions of expropriation, ongoing slavery and economic inequality as part of global capitalism are already central to understanding contemporary conditions of gendered and racialized forms of violence. Making questions of race central to the enquiry about women under state socialism, Todorova introduces the notion of ‘socialist racialism’. Here, she traces affinities between modern Eurocentric epistemologies and Leninist and Marxist ideologies and socialist state formations. In situating Bulgaria as a location for such relational thinking, this examination is part of a larger recent effort to situate the Balkans and Southeast Europe within the episteme of racism and whiteness. The most exciting provocation of the book is Todorova’s relation with both socialism and capitalism as marked by a sense of doubt: an emotional and cognitive awareness that any economic, social and political formation has to be continuously critiqued, examined, distrusted and replaced (p. 5). This is the doubt that leads to unease with Marxism, socialism, capitalism, and liberalism and seeks to ‘transcend these modern Eurocentric ideologies that have arrested our imaginations and politics’ (p. 5). ‘Postsocialist feminist doubt’ 1165859 EJW0010.1177/13505068231165859European Journal of Women’s StudiesBook reviews book-review2023\",\"PeriodicalId\":312959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Women's Studies\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Women's Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13505068231165859\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Women's Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13505068231165859","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

社会主义下的不平等:保加利亚的种族、妇女和跨国主义是一个强有力的指南和伙伴,在这个时代,寻找国家社会主义和新自由主义资本主义项目的解放替代方案越来越迫切。这是非常及时的,因为它出现在一个时刻,保持关注来自苏联/俄罗斯和西方帝国主义的暴力形式是对当代学术的挑战。正是在这里,Todorova的贡献从女权主义的立场出发,告诫人们不要将社会主义和集体主义形式的经济和文化生产项目浪漫化,并指出性别和种族不平等仍未得到解决。这种批判特别针对西方学术研究和教育中的马克思主义、唯物主义和阶级分析,以应对新自由主义的危机。然而,我们错过了与跨国女权主义学者和集体最近的作品对话的机会,对他们来说,作为全球资本主义的一部分,征用、持续的奴隶制和经济不平等的问题已经成为理解当代性别和种族化暴力形式的核心条件。托多洛娃提出了“社会主义种族主义”的概念,使种族问题成为国家社会主义下妇女问题的中心。在这里,她追溯了现代欧洲中心认识论与列宁主义和马克思主义意识形态以及社会主义国家形态之间的联系。在将保加利亚定位为这种关系思考的地点的过程中,这项研究是最近将巴尔干和东南欧定位于种族主义和白人认知的更大努力的一部分。这本书中最令人兴奋的挑衅是托多洛娃与社会主义和资本主义的关系,其特征是一种怀疑感:一种情感和认知意识,即任何经济、社会和政治形态都必须不断受到批评、审查、不信任和取代(第5页)。这种怀疑导致对马克思主义、社会主义、资本主义、和自由主义,并寻求“超越这些现代欧洲中心意识形态,这些意识形态已经限制了我们的想象力和政治”(第5页)。“后社会主义女权主义怀疑”1165859 ejw0010 .1177/13505068231165859欧洲妇女研究杂志书评书评2023
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Book review: Staying with doubt, not yet dancing with Azis
Unequal Under Socialism: Race, Women, and Transnationalism in Bulgaria is a powerful guide and companion at a time when the search for emancipatory alternatives to the project of both state socialism and neoliberal capitalism is ever more urgent. It is extremely timely as it comes at a moment when keeping the focus on forms of violence that derive from both Soviet/Russian and Western imperialisms is a challenge to contemporary scholarship. It is here that Todorova’s contribution speaks from a feminist standpoint cautioning against romanticized visions of projects built around socialist and collectivist forms of economic and cultural production, pointing to gender and racial inequalities that remain unaddressed. This critique is especially directed to Marxist, materialist, and class analysis within Western academic research and education in response to the crisis of neoliberalism. However, there is a missed opportunity to dialogue with recent works of transnational feminist scholarship and collectives to whom questions of expropriation, ongoing slavery and economic inequality as part of global capitalism are already central to understanding contemporary conditions of gendered and racialized forms of violence. Making questions of race central to the enquiry about women under state socialism, Todorova introduces the notion of ‘socialist racialism’. Here, she traces affinities between modern Eurocentric epistemologies and Leninist and Marxist ideologies and socialist state formations. In situating Bulgaria as a location for such relational thinking, this examination is part of a larger recent effort to situate the Balkans and Southeast Europe within the episteme of racism and whiteness. The most exciting provocation of the book is Todorova’s relation with both socialism and capitalism as marked by a sense of doubt: an emotional and cognitive awareness that any economic, social and political formation has to be continuously critiqued, examined, distrusted and replaced (p. 5). This is the doubt that leads to unease with Marxism, socialism, capitalism, and liberalism and seeks to ‘transcend these modern Eurocentric ideologies that have arrested our imaginations and politics’ (p. 5). ‘Postsocialist feminist doubt’ 1165859 EJW0010.1177/13505068231165859European Journal of Women’s StudiesBook reviews book-review2023
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信