标点符号在认知语法中的地位

Zeki Hamawand
{"title":"标点符号在认知语法中的地位","authors":"Zeki Hamawand","doi":"10.1075/COGLS.00018.HAM","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper seeks to provide a new analysis of punctuation marks in English. To do so, it substantiates two claims of Cognitive\n Grammar. One claim is that the meaning of a linguistic expression is best understood in terms of the domain to which it belongs.\n In light of this claim, the paper argues that punctuation marks form sets in which they highlight similarities in general but\n differences in specifics. The other claim is that the use of a linguistic expression is governed by the particular construal\n imposed on its content. In view of this claim, the paper argues that the use of a punctuation mark stems from the particular\n construal the speaker chooses to describe a situation. The occurrence of two or more punctuation marks gives rise to semantic\n contrast, in which each mark represents a different construal, and so a different meaning. The aim of the analysis is to emphasise\n the roles which punctuation marks play in the interpretation of sentences, namely in conveying meaning.","PeriodicalId":127458,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Linguistic Studies","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The status of punctuation marks in Cognitive Grammar\",\"authors\":\"Zeki Hamawand\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/COGLS.00018.HAM\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This paper seeks to provide a new analysis of punctuation marks in English. To do so, it substantiates two claims of Cognitive\\n Grammar. One claim is that the meaning of a linguistic expression is best understood in terms of the domain to which it belongs.\\n In light of this claim, the paper argues that punctuation marks form sets in which they highlight similarities in general but\\n differences in specifics. The other claim is that the use of a linguistic expression is governed by the particular construal\\n imposed on its content. In view of this claim, the paper argues that the use of a punctuation mark stems from the particular\\n construal the speaker chooses to describe a situation. The occurrence of two or more punctuation marks gives rise to semantic\\n contrast, in which each mark represents a different construal, and so a different meaning. The aim of the analysis is to emphasise\\n the roles which punctuation marks play in the interpretation of sentences, namely in conveying meaning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":127458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive Linguistic Studies\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive Linguistic Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/COGLS.00018.HAM\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Linguistic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/COGLS.00018.HAM","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文试图对英语标点符号进行一种新的分析。为此,它证实了认知语法的两个主张。一种说法是,语言表达的意义最好是根据它所属的领域来理解的。根据这一说法,本文认为标点符号形成了一种集合,在这种集合中,它们突出了一般的相似性,但在具体的差异性。另一种说法是,语言表达的使用受到强加于其内容的特定解释的支配。鉴于这一观点,本文认为,标点符号的使用源于说话人选择描述一种情况的特定解释。两个或两个以上标点符号的出现会产生语义对比,其中每个符号代表不同的解释,因此具有不同的含义。分析的目的是强调标点符号在句子解释中所起的作用,即在传递意义方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The status of punctuation marks in Cognitive Grammar
This paper seeks to provide a new analysis of punctuation marks in English. To do so, it substantiates two claims of Cognitive Grammar. One claim is that the meaning of a linguistic expression is best understood in terms of the domain to which it belongs. In light of this claim, the paper argues that punctuation marks form sets in which they highlight similarities in general but differences in specifics. The other claim is that the use of a linguistic expression is governed by the particular construal imposed on its content. In view of this claim, the paper argues that the use of a punctuation mark stems from the particular construal the speaker chooses to describe a situation. The occurrence of two or more punctuation marks gives rise to semantic contrast, in which each mark represents a different construal, and so a different meaning. The aim of the analysis is to emphasise the roles which punctuation marks play in the interpretation of sentences, namely in conveying meaning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信