基于遗传算法的WMN仿真系统:考虑DCF和EDCA的不同结构和均匀分布的WMN- ga系统性能分析

I. Shinko, Tetsuya Oda, Evjola Spaho, Admir Barolli, Vladi Koliçi, L. Barolli
{"title":"基于遗传算法的WMN仿真系统:考虑DCF和EDCA的不同结构和均匀分布的WMN- ga系统性能分析","authors":"I. Shinko, Tetsuya Oda, Evjola Spaho, Admir Barolli, Vladi Koliçi, L. Barolli","doi":"10.1109/AINA.2016.145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wireless Mesh Networks (WMNs) are attracting a lot of attention from wireless network researchers. Node placement problems have been investigated for a long time in the optimization field due to numerous applications in location science. In this paper, we evaluate the performance of two WMN architectures considering throughput, delay, jitter and fairness index metrics. For simulations, we used ns-3 and Optimized Link State Routing (OLSR). We compare the performance for Distributed Coordination Function (DCF) and Enhanced Distributed Channel Access (EDCA) for uniform distribution of mesh clients by sending multiple Constant Bit Rate (CBR) flows in the network. The simulation results show that for I/B WMN, the throughput of EDCA is a little bit higher than Hybrid WMN. However, for Hybrid WMN, the throughput of DCF is higher than EDCA. The delay and jitter of both architectures are almost the same. However, in the case of DCF for 20 flows, the delay and jitter of I/B WMN is a lower compared with Hybrid WMN. The fairness index of 10 flows is higher than other flows for both WMN architectures.","PeriodicalId":438655,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE 30th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA)","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A GA-Based Simulation System for WMNs: Performance Analysis of WMN-GA System for Different WMN Architectures and Uniform Distribution Considering DCF and EDCA\",\"authors\":\"I. Shinko, Tetsuya Oda, Evjola Spaho, Admir Barolli, Vladi Koliçi, L. Barolli\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/AINA.2016.145\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Wireless Mesh Networks (WMNs) are attracting a lot of attention from wireless network researchers. Node placement problems have been investigated for a long time in the optimization field due to numerous applications in location science. In this paper, we evaluate the performance of two WMN architectures considering throughput, delay, jitter and fairness index metrics. For simulations, we used ns-3 and Optimized Link State Routing (OLSR). We compare the performance for Distributed Coordination Function (DCF) and Enhanced Distributed Channel Access (EDCA) for uniform distribution of mesh clients by sending multiple Constant Bit Rate (CBR) flows in the network. The simulation results show that for I/B WMN, the throughput of EDCA is a little bit higher than Hybrid WMN. However, for Hybrid WMN, the throughput of DCF is higher than EDCA. The delay and jitter of both architectures are almost the same. However, in the case of DCF for 20 flows, the delay and jitter of I/B WMN is a lower compared with Hybrid WMN. The fairness index of 10 flows is higher than other flows for both WMN architectures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":438655,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 IEEE 30th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA)\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-03-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 IEEE 30th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/AINA.2016.145\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE 30th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AINA.2016.145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

无线网状网络(Wireless Mesh Networks, WMNs)正受到无线网络研究人员的广泛关注。由于在定位科学中的大量应用,节点放置问题在优化领域已经研究了很长时间。在本文中,我们考虑吞吐量、延迟、抖动和公平性指标来评估两种WMN架构的性能。为了模拟,我们使用ns-3和优化链路状态路由(OLSR)。通过在网络中发送多个恒定比特率(CBR)流,比较了分布式协调函数(DCF)和增强型分布式通道访问(EDCA)在网格客户端均匀分布方面的性能。仿真结果表明,对于I/B WMN, EDCA的吞吐量略高于Hybrid WMN。然而,对于混合WMN, DCF的吞吐量高于EDCA。两种架构的延迟和抖动几乎是相同的。然而,在DCF为20流的情况下,I/B WMN的延迟和抖动比Hybrid WMN要低。在两种WMN体系结构中,10个流的公平性指数都高于其他流。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A GA-Based Simulation System for WMNs: Performance Analysis of WMN-GA System for Different WMN Architectures and Uniform Distribution Considering DCF and EDCA
Wireless Mesh Networks (WMNs) are attracting a lot of attention from wireless network researchers. Node placement problems have been investigated for a long time in the optimization field due to numerous applications in location science. In this paper, we evaluate the performance of two WMN architectures considering throughput, delay, jitter and fairness index metrics. For simulations, we used ns-3 and Optimized Link State Routing (OLSR). We compare the performance for Distributed Coordination Function (DCF) and Enhanced Distributed Channel Access (EDCA) for uniform distribution of mesh clients by sending multiple Constant Bit Rate (CBR) flows in the network. The simulation results show that for I/B WMN, the throughput of EDCA is a little bit higher than Hybrid WMN. However, for Hybrid WMN, the throughput of DCF is higher than EDCA. The delay and jitter of both architectures are almost the same. However, in the case of DCF for 20 flows, the delay and jitter of I/B WMN is a lower compared with Hybrid WMN. The fairness index of 10 flows is higher than other flows for both WMN architectures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信