玻璃纤维增强复合材料在搭扣上的应用——贴面复合材料粘接方法的研究

C. Kishita, Y. Nishi, K. Tsuru, Hiromi Maruyama, Shunichi Hamamura, E. Nagaoka
{"title":"玻璃纤维增强复合材料在搭扣上的应用——贴面复合材料粘接方法的研究","authors":"C. Kishita, Y. Nishi, K. Tsuru, Hiromi Maruyama, Shunichi Hamamura, E. Nagaoka","doi":"10.2186/PRP.7.141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was to compare different methods for effective adhesion between a glass fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) material for framework and a veneering composite (VC) material for coating framework when fabricating clasps (FRC clasp (with VC)). Vectris pontic and EG fiber were used as FRC materials, the glass fibers of which were preimpregnated with resin. Palfique estelite LV was used as the VC material.Laminate specimens were fabricated by coating FRC with VC (Palfique⁄Vectris, Palfique⁄EG fiber). Five adhesion methods were used when coating the framework. Three specimens were prepared for each adhesion methods. Deflection and load when VC cracked were examined using the three-point flexural test. The mean and S.D. of each value were calculated and subjected to two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multiple comparisons (Bonferroni⁄ Dunn) to determine the significance of the differences (P = 0.05 and 0.01) between the results of the respective methods.The deflection of Palfique⁄Vectris and Palfique⁄EG fiber was 0.497-0.631 and 0.426-0.481 mm, respectively, the load of which was 92.33-108.00 and 60.17-72.50 N, respectively. The deflection and load under all adhesion methods were significantly higher in Palfique⁄Vectris than Palfique⁄EG fiber (P<0.01). In Palfique⁄Vectris, deflection under non-adhesion was significantly lower than under others, but there were no significant differences among loads in different adhesion methods. In Palfique⁄EG fiber, there were no significant differences among deflections and loads in all adhesion methods.In the present study, the results suggested that sandblasting could be effective to increase the amount of deflection causing VC cracking in a clasp arm.","PeriodicalId":306414,"journal":{"name":"Prosthodontic Research & Practice","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of a Glass Fiber-reinforced Composite Material to Clasps: Study on Adhesive Method of Veneering Composite\",\"authors\":\"C. Kishita, Y. Nishi, K. Tsuru, Hiromi Maruyama, Shunichi Hamamura, E. Nagaoka\",\"doi\":\"10.2186/PRP.7.141\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this study was to compare different methods for effective adhesion between a glass fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) material for framework and a veneering composite (VC) material for coating framework when fabricating clasps (FRC clasp (with VC)). Vectris pontic and EG fiber were used as FRC materials, the glass fibers of which were preimpregnated with resin. Palfique estelite LV was used as the VC material.Laminate specimens were fabricated by coating FRC with VC (Palfique⁄Vectris, Palfique⁄EG fiber). Five adhesion methods were used when coating the framework. Three specimens were prepared for each adhesion methods. Deflection and load when VC cracked were examined using the three-point flexural test. The mean and S.D. of each value were calculated and subjected to two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multiple comparisons (Bonferroni⁄ Dunn) to determine the significance of the differences (P = 0.05 and 0.01) between the results of the respective methods.The deflection of Palfique⁄Vectris and Palfique⁄EG fiber was 0.497-0.631 and 0.426-0.481 mm, respectively, the load of which was 92.33-108.00 and 60.17-72.50 N, respectively. The deflection and load under all adhesion methods were significantly higher in Palfique⁄Vectris than Palfique⁄EG fiber (P<0.01). In Palfique⁄Vectris, deflection under non-adhesion was significantly lower than under others, but there were no significant differences among loads in different adhesion methods. In Palfique⁄EG fiber, there were no significant differences among deflections and loads in all adhesion methods.In the present study, the results suggested that sandblasting could be effective to increase the amount of deflection causing VC cracking in a clasp arm.\",\"PeriodicalId\":306414,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prosthodontic Research & Practice\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prosthodontic Research & Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2186/PRP.7.141\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prosthodontic Research & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2186/PRP.7.141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究的目的是比较玻璃纤维增强复合材料(FRC)框架材料和贴面复合材料(VC)涂层框架材料在制造卡扣(FRC卡扣(含VC))时有效粘附的不同方法。FRC材料采用桥状纤维和EG纤维,玻璃纤维经树脂预浸渍。VC材料采用Palfique estelite LV。用VC (Palfique / Vectris, Palfique / EG纤维)包覆FRC制成层压试件。涂覆骨架时采用了五种粘结方法。每种粘附方法制备3个标本。采用三点弯曲试验对VC开裂时的挠度和载荷进行了研究。计算每个值的均值和标准差,并进行双向方差分析(ANOVA)和多重比较(Bonferroni / Dunn),以确定各自方法结果之间差异的显著性(P = 0.05和0.01)。Palfique / Vectris和Palfique / EG纤维挠度分别为0.497 ~ 0.631和0.426 ~ 0.481 mm,载荷分别为92.33 ~ 108.00和60.17 ~ 72.50 N。所有粘附方法下Palfique / Vectris纤维的挠度和载荷均显著高于Palfique / EG纤维(P<0.01)。在Palfique / Vectris中,不粘附情况下挠度明显低于其他情况,但不同粘附方式下载荷间无显著差异。在Palfique / EG纤维中,所有粘附方法的挠度和载荷均无显著差异。在本研究中,结果表明喷砂可以有效地增加引起搭扣臂VC裂纹的挠度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Application of a Glass Fiber-reinforced Composite Material to Clasps: Study on Adhesive Method of Veneering Composite
The aim of this study was to compare different methods for effective adhesion between a glass fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) material for framework and a veneering composite (VC) material for coating framework when fabricating clasps (FRC clasp (with VC)). Vectris pontic and EG fiber were used as FRC materials, the glass fibers of which were preimpregnated with resin. Palfique estelite LV was used as the VC material.Laminate specimens were fabricated by coating FRC with VC (Palfique⁄Vectris, Palfique⁄EG fiber). Five adhesion methods were used when coating the framework. Three specimens were prepared for each adhesion methods. Deflection and load when VC cracked were examined using the three-point flexural test. The mean and S.D. of each value were calculated and subjected to two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multiple comparisons (Bonferroni⁄ Dunn) to determine the significance of the differences (P = 0.05 and 0.01) between the results of the respective methods.The deflection of Palfique⁄Vectris and Palfique⁄EG fiber was 0.497-0.631 and 0.426-0.481 mm, respectively, the load of which was 92.33-108.00 and 60.17-72.50 N, respectively. The deflection and load under all adhesion methods were significantly higher in Palfique⁄Vectris than Palfique⁄EG fiber (P<0.01). In Palfique⁄Vectris, deflection under non-adhesion was significantly lower than under others, but there were no significant differences among loads in different adhesion methods. In Palfique⁄EG fiber, there were no significant differences among deflections and loads in all adhesion methods.In the present study, the results suggested that sandblasting could be effective to increase the amount of deflection causing VC cracking in a clasp arm.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信