使用攻击图的时间效率和成本效益的网络加固

Massimiliano Albanese, S. Jajodia, S. Noel
{"title":"使用攻击图的时间效率和成本效益的网络加固","authors":"Massimiliano Albanese, S. Jajodia, S. Noel","doi":"10.1109/DSN.2012.6263942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Attack graph analysis has been established as a powerful tool for analyzing network vulnerability. However, previous approaches to network hardening look for exact solutions and thus do not scale. Further, hardening elements have been treated independently, which is inappropriate for real environments. For example, the cost for patching many systems may be nearly the same as for patching a single one. Or patching a vulnerability may have the same effect as blocking traffic with a firewall, while blocking a port may deny legitimate service. By failing to account for such hardening interdependencies, the resulting recommendations can be unrealistic and far from optimal. Instead, we formalize the notion of hardening strategy in terms of allowable actions, and define a cost model that takes into account the impact of interdependent hardening actions. We also introduce a near-optimal approximation algorithm that scales linearly with the size of the graphs, which we validate experimentally.","PeriodicalId":236791,"journal":{"name":"IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN 2012)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"111","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Time-efficient and cost-effective network hardening using attack graphs\",\"authors\":\"Massimiliano Albanese, S. Jajodia, S. Noel\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/DSN.2012.6263942\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Attack graph analysis has been established as a powerful tool for analyzing network vulnerability. However, previous approaches to network hardening look for exact solutions and thus do not scale. Further, hardening elements have been treated independently, which is inappropriate for real environments. For example, the cost for patching many systems may be nearly the same as for patching a single one. Or patching a vulnerability may have the same effect as blocking traffic with a firewall, while blocking a port may deny legitimate service. By failing to account for such hardening interdependencies, the resulting recommendations can be unrealistic and far from optimal. Instead, we formalize the notion of hardening strategy in terms of allowable actions, and define a cost model that takes into account the impact of interdependent hardening actions. We also introduce a near-optimal approximation algorithm that scales linearly with the size of the graphs, which we validate experimentally.\",\"PeriodicalId\":236791,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN 2012)\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"111\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN 2012)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/DSN.2012.6263942\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN 2012)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DSN.2012.6263942","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 111

摘要

攻击图分析已成为分析网络漏洞的有力工具。然而,以前的网络加固方法寻找精确的解决方案,因此无法扩展。此外,硬化元素是单独处理的,不适合实际环境。例如,修补多个系统的成本可能与修补单个系统的成本几乎相同。或者修补漏洞可能与使用防火墙阻止流量具有相同的效果,而阻止端口可能会拒绝合法服务。由于没有考虑到这种强化的相互依赖性,所得到的建议可能是不现实的,而且远非最佳的。相反,我们将根据可允许的操作形式化强化策略的概念,并定义一个考虑到相互依赖的强化操作影响的成本模型。我们还介绍了一种近似最优的近似算法,该算法与图的大小线性扩展,我们通过实验验证了这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Time-efficient and cost-effective network hardening using attack graphs
Attack graph analysis has been established as a powerful tool for analyzing network vulnerability. However, previous approaches to network hardening look for exact solutions and thus do not scale. Further, hardening elements have been treated independently, which is inappropriate for real environments. For example, the cost for patching many systems may be nearly the same as for patching a single one. Or patching a vulnerability may have the same effect as blocking traffic with a firewall, while blocking a port may deny legitimate service. By failing to account for such hardening interdependencies, the resulting recommendations can be unrealistic and far from optimal. Instead, we formalize the notion of hardening strategy in terms of allowable actions, and define a cost model that takes into account the impact of interdependent hardening actions. We also introduce a near-optimal approximation algorithm that scales linearly with the size of the graphs, which we validate experimentally.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信