基于组织学图像的大肠癌分类:DNN与CNN的比较

Jue Han, Deshang Kong
{"title":"基于组织学图像的大肠癌分类:DNN与CNN的比较","authors":"Jue Han, Deshang Kong","doi":"10.1117/12.2672689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to statistics from the World Health Organization, Colorectal Cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer in the world. The detection of CRC in an early stage is crucial for on-time and proper treatment, which may significantly increase the patient's survival rate. Although computers are not qualified to replace human experts at the moment, having a referential result from CRC auto-detection and saving the time of manual diagnosis is still very meaningful. This paper compares the performances of two different neural networks classifying CRC based on a set of histology images. The labeled dataset is publicly available on the Tensorflow website, and the two neural networks are tested on the same dataset separately. The first type of neural network in this study is Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), and the second type is a Deep Neural Network (DNN). As the dataset splits into training, testing, and validation sets, the loss, accuracy, and training time are recorded by the end of each epoch. The study result shows that the CNN method is better than the DNN method in terms of CRC image classification. It takes a long time but has better performance.","PeriodicalId":290902,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Mechatronics Engineering and Artificial Intelligence","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Colorectal cancer classification based on histology images: comparison between DNN and CNN\",\"authors\":\"Jue Han, Deshang Kong\",\"doi\":\"10.1117/12.2672689\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"According to statistics from the World Health Organization, Colorectal Cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer in the world. The detection of CRC in an early stage is crucial for on-time and proper treatment, which may significantly increase the patient's survival rate. Although computers are not qualified to replace human experts at the moment, having a referential result from CRC auto-detection and saving the time of manual diagnosis is still very meaningful. This paper compares the performances of two different neural networks classifying CRC based on a set of histology images. The labeled dataset is publicly available on the Tensorflow website, and the two neural networks are tested on the same dataset separately. The first type of neural network in this study is Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), and the second type is a Deep Neural Network (DNN). As the dataset splits into training, testing, and validation sets, the loss, accuracy, and training time are recorded by the end of each epoch. The study result shows that the CNN method is better than the DNN method in terms of CRC image classification. It takes a long time but has better performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":290902,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Conference on Mechatronics Engineering and Artificial Intelligence\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Conference on Mechatronics Engineering and Artificial Intelligence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2672689\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Mechatronics Engineering and Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2672689","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据世界卫生组织的统计数据,结直肠癌(CRC)是世界上第三大最常见的癌症。早期发现结直肠癌对于及时、正确的治疗至关重要,可以显著提高患者的生存率。虽然目前计算机还不具备取代人类专家的能力,但是从CRC自动检测中得到一个可参考的结果,节省人工诊断的时间,仍然是非常有意义的。本文比较了基于一组组织学图像的两种不同神经网络对CRC的分类性能。标记的数据集在Tensorflow网站上公开可用,两个神经网络分别在同一数据集上进行测试。本研究中的第一类神经网络是卷积神经网络(CNN),第二类是深度神经网络(DNN)。当数据集分为训练集、测试集和验证集时,在每个epoch结束时记录损失、准确性和训练时间。研究结果表明,CNN方法在CRC图像分类方面优于DNN方法。耗时长,但性能好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Colorectal cancer classification based on histology images: comparison between DNN and CNN
According to statistics from the World Health Organization, Colorectal Cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer in the world. The detection of CRC in an early stage is crucial for on-time and proper treatment, which may significantly increase the patient's survival rate. Although computers are not qualified to replace human experts at the moment, having a referential result from CRC auto-detection and saving the time of manual diagnosis is still very meaningful. This paper compares the performances of two different neural networks classifying CRC based on a set of histology images. The labeled dataset is publicly available on the Tensorflow website, and the two neural networks are tested on the same dataset separately. The first type of neural network in this study is Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), and the second type is a Deep Neural Network (DNN). As the dataset splits into training, testing, and validation sets, the loss, accuracy, and training time are recorded by the end of each epoch. The study result shows that the CNN method is better than the DNN method in terms of CRC image classification. It takes a long time but has better performance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信