T. Kusakari, N. Sumida, Satomi Suzuki, Yihisien Enatsu, K. Murata, N. Tatsumi
{"title":"腹腔镜手术治疗妊娠期附件肿块的疗效评价","authors":"T. Kusakari, N. Sumida, Satomi Suzuki, Yihisien Enatsu, K. Murata, N. Tatsumi","doi":"10.5180/JSGOE.28.627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopy compared to laparotomy for treatment of adnexal masses in pregnancy, with a particular attention to the pregnancy outcome. Design: Retrospective study. Setting: Private hospital. Patients: 19 women with adnexal masses in pregnancy. Interventions: Seven women who underwent laparoscopy and 12 women who underwent laparotomy from 2001","PeriodicalId":325241,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Gynecologic and Obstetric Endoscopy","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Laparoscopic Surgery for Adnexal Masses in Pregnancy\",\"authors\":\"T. Kusakari, N. Sumida, Satomi Suzuki, Yihisien Enatsu, K. Murata, N. Tatsumi\",\"doi\":\"10.5180/JSGOE.28.627\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopy compared to laparotomy for treatment of adnexal masses in pregnancy, with a particular attention to the pregnancy outcome. Design: Retrospective study. Setting: Private hospital. Patients: 19 women with adnexal masses in pregnancy. Interventions: Seven women who underwent laparoscopy and 12 women who underwent laparotomy from 2001\",\"PeriodicalId\":325241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Japanese Journal of Gynecologic and Obstetric Endoscopy\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Japanese Journal of Gynecologic and Obstetric Endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5180/JSGOE.28.627\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Gynecologic and Obstetric Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5180/JSGOE.28.627","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of Laparoscopic Surgery for Adnexal Masses in Pregnancy
Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopy compared to laparotomy for treatment of adnexal masses in pregnancy, with a particular attention to the pregnancy outcome. Design: Retrospective study. Setting: Private hospital. Patients: 19 women with adnexal masses in pregnancy. Interventions: Seven women who underwent laparoscopy and 12 women who underwent laparotomy from 2001