驱动企业社会绩效的因素是什么?拥护民族文化价值观的作用

Namporn Thanetsunthorn, Rattaphon Wuthisatian
{"title":"驱动企业社会绩效的因素是什么?拥护民族文化价值观的作用","authors":"Namporn Thanetsunthorn, Rattaphon Wuthisatian","doi":"10.1142/9789811206887_0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study examines the impact of national culture on the four important aspects of corporate social responsibility (CSR) — community (COM), employee (EMP), environment (ENV), and governance (GOV). An empirical analysis is based on socially responsible performance of 8,333 corporations from 59 countries across nine different regions around the globe. The findings suggest that Hofstede’s four dimensions of national culture — power distance (PDI), individualism (IDV), masculinity (MAS), and uncertainty avoidance (UAI) — have significant impacts on socially responsible corporate performance, either positively or negatively, depending on a given aspect of CSR. Overall, the results explain substantial variations in the effects of different cultural typologies on the corporate social performance and are consistently robust across a variety of statistical methods, including ordinary least squares (OLS) regression, regression with robust standard error, censored normal regression (Tobit), and regression with the inclusion of industry-specific variables. The findings of this study establish useful strategic implications of CSR for business corporations and policymakers, as well as guidance for further academic inquiries.","PeriodicalId":368975,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Social Responsibility, Ethics and Sustainable Prosperity","volume":"484 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Drives Corporate Social Performance? The Role of Espoused National Cultural Values\",\"authors\":\"Namporn Thanetsunthorn, Rattaphon Wuthisatian\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/9789811206887_0001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study examines the impact of national culture on the four important aspects of corporate social responsibility (CSR) — community (COM), employee (EMP), environment (ENV), and governance (GOV). An empirical analysis is based on socially responsible performance of 8,333 corporations from 59 countries across nine different regions around the globe. The findings suggest that Hofstede’s four dimensions of national culture — power distance (PDI), individualism (IDV), masculinity (MAS), and uncertainty avoidance (UAI) — have significant impacts on socially responsible corporate performance, either positively or negatively, depending on a given aspect of CSR. Overall, the results explain substantial variations in the effects of different cultural typologies on the corporate social performance and are consistently robust across a variety of statistical methods, including ordinary least squares (OLS) regression, regression with robust standard error, censored normal regression (Tobit), and regression with the inclusion of industry-specific variables. The findings of this study establish useful strategic implications of CSR for business corporations and policymakers, as well as guidance for further academic inquiries.\",\"PeriodicalId\":368975,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Corporate Social Responsibility, Ethics and Sustainable Prosperity\",\"volume\":\"484 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Corporate Social Responsibility, Ethics and Sustainable Prosperity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/9789811206887_0001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Social Responsibility, Ethics and Sustainable Prosperity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/9789811206887_0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

该研究考察了国家文化对企业社会责任(CSR)的四个重要方面——社区(COM)、员工(EMP)、环境(ENV)和治理(GOV)的影响。实证分析基于全球9个不同地区59个国家8333家企业的社会责任表现。研究结果表明,Hofstede提出的国家文化的四个维度——权力距离(PDI)、个人主义(IDV)、男子气概(MAS)和不确定性规避(UAI)——对企业社会责任绩效有显著影响,根据企业社会责任的特定方面,有积极或消极的影响。总体而言,研究结果解释了不同文化类型对企业社会绩效影响的巨大差异,并且在各种统计方法(包括普通最小二乘(OLS)回归、稳健标准误差回归、审查正态回归(Tobit)和包含行业特定变量的回归)中都具有一致的稳健性。本研究的结果为企业和决策者提供了有益的企业社会责任战略启示,并为进一步的学术研究提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What Drives Corporate Social Performance? The Role of Espoused National Cultural Values
The study examines the impact of national culture on the four important aspects of corporate social responsibility (CSR) — community (COM), employee (EMP), environment (ENV), and governance (GOV). An empirical analysis is based on socially responsible performance of 8,333 corporations from 59 countries across nine different regions around the globe. The findings suggest that Hofstede’s four dimensions of national culture — power distance (PDI), individualism (IDV), masculinity (MAS), and uncertainty avoidance (UAI) — have significant impacts on socially responsible corporate performance, either positively or negatively, depending on a given aspect of CSR. Overall, the results explain substantial variations in the effects of different cultural typologies on the corporate social performance and are consistently robust across a variety of statistical methods, including ordinary least squares (OLS) regression, regression with robust standard error, censored normal regression (Tobit), and regression with the inclusion of industry-specific variables. The findings of this study establish useful strategic implications of CSR for business corporations and policymakers, as well as guidance for further academic inquiries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信