解决多维模型中事实-维度关系的总结性问题

J. Mazón, Jens Lechtenbörger, J. Trujillo
{"title":"解决多维模型中事实-维度关系的总结性问题","authors":"J. Mazón, Jens Lechtenbörger, J. Trujillo","doi":"10.1145/1458432.1458443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Multidimensional analysis allows decision makers to efficiently and effectively use data analysis tools, which mainly depend on multidimensional (MD) structures of a data warehouse such as facts and dimension hierarchies to explore the information and aggregate it at different levels of detail in an accurate way. A conceptual model of such MD structures serves as abstract basis of the subsequent implementation according to one specific technology. However, there is a semantic gap between a conceptual model and its implementation which complicates an adequate treatment of summarizability issues, which in turn may lead to erroneous results of data analysis tools and cause the failure of the whole data warehouse project. To bridge this gap for relationships between facts and dimension, we present an approach at the conceptual level for (i) identifying problematic situations in fact-dimension relationships, (ii) defining these relationships in a conceptual MD model, and (iii) applying a normalization process to transform this conceptual MD model into a summarizability-compliant model that avoids erroneous analysis of data. Furthermore, we also describe our Eclipsebased implementation of this normalization process.","PeriodicalId":335396,"journal":{"name":"International Workshop on Data Warehousing and OLAP","volume":"92 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"29","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Solving summarizability problems in fact-dimension relationships for multidimensional models\",\"authors\":\"J. Mazón, Jens Lechtenbörger, J. Trujillo\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1458432.1458443\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Multidimensional analysis allows decision makers to efficiently and effectively use data analysis tools, which mainly depend on multidimensional (MD) structures of a data warehouse such as facts and dimension hierarchies to explore the information and aggregate it at different levels of detail in an accurate way. A conceptual model of such MD structures serves as abstract basis of the subsequent implementation according to one specific technology. However, there is a semantic gap between a conceptual model and its implementation which complicates an adequate treatment of summarizability issues, which in turn may lead to erroneous results of data analysis tools and cause the failure of the whole data warehouse project. To bridge this gap for relationships between facts and dimension, we present an approach at the conceptual level for (i) identifying problematic situations in fact-dimension relationships, (ii) defining these relationships in a conceptual MD model, and (iii) applying a normalization process to transform this conceptual MD model into a summarizability-compliant model that avoids erroneous analysis of data. Furthermore, we also describe our Eclipsebased implementation of this normalization process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":335396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Workshop on Data Warehousing and OLAP\",\"volume\":\"92 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"29\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Workshop on Data Warehousing and OLAP\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1458432.1458443\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Workshop on Data Warehousing and OLAP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1458432.1458443","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

摘要

多维分析允许决策者高效有效地使用数据分析工具,这些工具主要依赖于数据仓库的多维(MD)结构,如事实和维度层次结构,以准确的方式探索信息并在不同的细节级别上进行聚合。这种MD结构的概念模型作为根据一种特定技术的后续实现的抽象基础。然而,概念模型和它的实现之间存在语义上的差距,这使得对可总结性问题的适当处理变得复杂,这反过来可能导致数据分析工具的错误结果,并导致整个数据仓库项目的失败。为了弥合事实和维度之间关系的差距,我们在概念层面提出了一种方法,用于(i)识别事实-维度关系中的问题情况,(ii)在概念MD模型中定义这些关系,以及(iii)应用规范化过程将该概念MD模型转换为符合摘要性的模型,以避免错误的数据分析。此外,我们还描述了这个规范化过程的基于eclipse的实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Solving summarizability problems in fact-dimension relationships for multidimensional models
Multidimensional analysis allows decision makers to efficiently and effectively use data analysis tools, which mainly depend on multidimensional (MD) structures of a data warehouse such as facts and dimension hierarchies to explore the information and aggregate it at different levels of detail in an accurate way. A conceptual model of such MD structures serves as abstract basis of the subsequent implementation according to one specific technology. However, there is a semantic gap between a conceptual model and its implementation which complicates an adequate treatment of summarizability issues, which in turn may lead to erroneous results of data analysis tools and cause the failure of the whole data warehouse project. To bridge this gap for relationships between facts and dimension, we present an approach at the conceptual level for (i) identifying problematic situations in fact-dimension relationships, (ii) defining these relationships in a conceptual MD model, and (iii) applying a normalization process to transform this conceptual MD model into a summarizability-compliant model that avoids erroneous analysis of data. Furthermore, we also describe our Eclipsebased implementation of this normalization process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信