0.5宽高比孔板不可压缩流动和锐边狭缝可压缩流动的流畅性验证

Q. Rayer, G. Snowsill
{"title":"0.5宽高比孔板不可压缩流动和锐边狭缝可压缩流动的流畅性验证","authors":"Q. Rayer, G. Snowsill","doi":"10.59972/nv82e8uk","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Validation against air systems problems is required to enable CFO codes to be confidently used in the design of turbine cooling air systems. CFO calculations of orifice and slit discharge coefficients (Cd) have been compared with measured and theoretical values. The literature details quantitative data for these cooling system elements. The turbulence model used critically affected the accuracy of incompressible calculations for a 0.5 aspect ratio orifice. Although commonly used in engines, this aspect ratio caused difficulties in accurately simulating flow reattachment. Sharp-edged slit compressible Cd calculations agreed with theory to 4%. These results give confidence that CFO will become a valuable tool for evaluating air system losses in novel configurations.","PeriodicalId":183819,"journal":{"name":"NAFEMS International Journal of CFD Case Studies","volume":"652 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fluent Validation for Incompressible Flow Through a 0.5 Aspect Ratio Orifice and Compressible Flow Through a Sharp-Edged Slit\",\"authors\":\"Q. Rayer, G. Snowsill\",\"doi\":\"10.59972/nv82e8uk\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Validation against air systems problems is required to enable CFO codes to be confidently used in the design of turbine cooling air systems. CFO calculations of orifice and slit discharge coefficients (Cd) have been compared with measured and theoretical values. The literature details quantitative data for these cooling system elements. The turbulence model used critically affected the accuracy of incompressible calculations for a 0.5 aspect ratio orifice. Although commonly used in engines, this aspect ratio caused difficulties in accurately simulating flow reattachment. Sharp-edged slit compressible Cd calculations agreed with theory to 4%. These results give confidence that CFO will become a valuable tool for evaluating air system losses in novel configurations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":183819,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NAFEMS International Journal of CFD Case Studies\",\"volume\":\"652 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NAFEMS International Journal of CFD Case Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.59972/nv82e8uk\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NAFEMS International Journal of CFD Case Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59972/nv82e8uk","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

需要对空气系统问题进行验证,以使CFO代码能够自信地用于涡轮冷却空气系统的设计。计算的孔口和狭缝放电系数(Cd)与实测值和理论值进行了比较。文献详细说明了这些冷却系统元件的定量数据。所使用的湍流模型严重影响了0.5展弦比孔板不可压缩计算的准确性。虽然通常用于发动机,但这种长径比在精确模拟流动再附着时造成了困难。锐边狭缝可压缩Cd的计算结果与理论一致,达到4%。这些结果使我们相信CFO将成为评估新型配置空气系统损失的有价值的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fluent Validation for Incompressible Flow Through a 0.5 Aspect Ratio Orifice and Compressible Flow Through a Sharp-Edged Slit
Validation against air systems problems is required to enable CFO codes to be confidently used in the design of turbine cooling air systems. CFO calculations of orifice and slit discharge coefficients (Cd) have been compared with measured and theoretical values. The literature details quantitative data for these cooling system elements. The turbulence model used critically affected the accuracy of incompressible calculations for a 0.5 aspect ratio orifice. Although commonly used in engines, this aspect ratio caused difficulties in accurately simulating flow reattachment. Sharp-edged slit compressible Cd calculations agreed with theory to 4%. These results give confidence that CFO will become a valuable tool for evaluating air system losses in novel configurations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信