宪法法院第18号/PUU-XVII/2019号及宪法法院第2/PUU-XIX/2021号判决后,保证书执行执行

Syadzwina Hindun Nabila
{"title":"宪法法院第18号/PUU-XVII/2019号及宪法法院第2/PUU-XIX/2021号判决后,保证书执行执行","authors":"Syadzwina Hindun Nabila","doi":"10.47268/pela.v1i3.7513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The Fiduciary Guarantee Certificate has the same executorial power as court decisions that have permanent legal force. Execution through a public auction of the object of Fiduciary Security without going through a court.   \nPurposes of the Research: The Purpose Of This Study Is To Answer The Legal Review On The Executorial Power Of Fiduciary Certificates Post-Decision Of The Constitutional Court Number: 18/PUU-XVII/2019 And The Decision Of The Constitutional Court Number: 2/PUU-XIX/2021.   \nMethods of the Research: This study uses a normative juridical method by using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. \nResults Originality of the Research: The execution of fiduciary guarantees is carried out when there is an agreement regarding the breach of contract and the willingness of the debtor to surrender the object that is the object of the fiduciary. If there is no agreement regarding the breach of contract and the debtor does not submit the object of collateral voluntarily, then the execution procedure of the fiduciary guarantee is carried out the same as the execution of a court decision that has permanent legal force, namely by submitting a request for execution to the district court. In addition, breach of contract also cannot be determined unilaterally. There must be an agreement regarding the breach of contract/default determined by both parties or on the basis of legal remedies (lawsuits) stating that one of the parties has defaulted.","PeriodicalId":251089,"journal":{"name":"PATTIMURA Legal Journal","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kekuatan Eksekutorial Sertifikat Jaminan Fidusia Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor: 18/PUU-XVII/2019 Dan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor: 2/PUU-XIX/2021\",\"authors\":\"Syadzwina Hindun Nabila\",\"doi\":\"10.47268/pela.v1i3.7513\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: The Fiduciary Guarantee Certificate has the same executorial power as court decisions that have permanent legal force. Execution through a public auction of the object of Fiduciary Security without going through a court.   \\nPurposes of the Research: The Purpose Of This Study Is To Answer The Legal Review On The Executorial Power Of Fiduciary Certificates Post-Decision Of The Constitutional Court Number: 18/PUU-XVII/2019 And The Decision Of The Constitutional Court Number: 2/PUU-XIX/2021.   \\nMethods of the Research: This study uses a normative juridical method by using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. \\nResults Originality of the Research: The execution of fiduciary guarantees is carried out when there is an agreement regarding the breach of contract and the willingness of the debtor to surrender the object that is the object of the fiduciary. If there is no agreement regarding the breach of contract and the debtor does not submit the object of collateral voluntarily, then the execution procedure of the fiduciary guarantee is carried out the same as the execution of a court decision that has permanent legal force, namely by submitting a request for execution to the district court. In addition, breach of contract also cannot be determined unilaterally. There must be an agreement regarding the breach of contract/default determined by both parties or on the basis of legal remedies (lawsuits) stating that one of the parties has defaulted.\",\"PeriodicalId\":251089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PATTIMURA Legal Journal\",\"volume\":\"72 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PATTIMURA Legal Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47268/pela.v1i3.7513\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PATTIMURA Legal Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47268/pela.v1i3.7513","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

信义担保证与法院判决具有相同的执行力,具有永久的法律效力。通过公开拍卖信托担保标的而不经过法院的执行。研究目的:本研究的目的是回答宪法法院第18/PUU-XVII/2019号判决书和宪法法院第2/PUU-XIX/2021号判决书后关于信义证书执行权的法律审查。研究方法:本研究采用规范性的司法方法,采用法定方法和概念方法。结果本研究的独创性:信义担保的履行是在有关于违约的协议和债务人愿意交出作为信义对象的客体时进行的。如果没有关于违约的协议,债务人没有自愿提交抵押品,那么信义担保的执行程序与执行具有永久法律效力的法院判决相同,即向地方法院提交执行请求。此外,违约行为也不能单方认定。必须有一个关于违约/违约的协议,由双方确定,或基于法律补救措施(诉讼),说明一方违约。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Kekuatan Eksekutorial Sertifikat Jaminan Fidusia Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor: 18/PUU-XVII/2019 Dan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor: 2/PUU-XIX/2021
Introduction: The Fiduciary Guarantee Certificate has the same executorial power as court decisions that have permanent legal force. Execution through a public auction of the object of Fiduciary Security without going through a court.   Purposes of the Research: The Purpose Of This Study Is To Answer The Legal Review On The Executorial Power Of Fiduciary Certificates Post-Decision Of The Constitutional Court Number: 18/PUU-XVII/2019 And The Decision Of The Constitutional Court Number: 2/PUU-XIX/2021.   Methods of the Research: This study uses a normative juridical method by using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Results Originality of the Research: The execution of fiduciary guarantees is carried out when there is an agreement regarding the breach of contract and the willingness of the debtor to surrender the object that is the object of the fiduciary. If there is no agreement regarding the breach of contract and the debtor does not submit the object of collateral voluntarily, then the execution procedure of the fiduciary guarantee is carried out the same as the execution of a court decision that has permanent legal force, namely by submitting a request for execution to the district court. In addition, breach of contract also cannot be determined unilaterally. There must be an agreement regarding the breach of contract/default determined by both parties or on the basis of legal remedies (lawsuits) stating that one of the parties has defaulted.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信