长豆荚螟虫的防治对策

N. Dutta, M. Sarkar, Akmrh Ferdous, K. Begum, D. Sarker
{"title":"长豆荚螟虫的防治对策","authors":"N. Dutta, M. Sarkar, Akmrh Ferdous, K. Begum, D. Sarker","doi":"10.3329/bjar.v45i3.62942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several management approaches were evaluated against pod borer attacking yard long bean during April - July, 2019 at Entomology Research Field, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI), Gazipur. The management package namely sanitation + spraying bio-pesticide Antario (Package 1), sanitation + spraying bio-pesticide Spinosad 45 SC (Package 3) and sanitation + alternate spraying of Antario and Spinosad 45SC (Package 4) showed almost equal effectiveness in reducing flower and pod damage by pod borer and higher yield. But the management package sanitation + spraying bio-pesticide Antario (Package 1) appeared best as it provided the highest marginal benefit cost ratio (MBCR) (10.09), which was followed by sanitation + alternate spraying of Antario and Spinosad 45SC (6.97) (Package 4), and sanitation + spraying biopesticide Spinosad 45 SC (5.29) (Package 3). The effectiveness of sanitation +Bt kurstaki) (Package 2) was poor in respect of yield (12.06 tha-1) and MBCR (3.44). \nBangladesh J. Agril. Res. 45(3): 233-237, September 2020","PeriodicalId":103111,"journal":{"name":"Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research","volume":"228 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management Approach Against Pod Borer, Eucrysops Cnejus F. Attacking Yard Long Bean\",\"authors\":\"N. Dutta, M. Sarkar, Akmrh Ferdous, K. Begum, D. Sarker\",\"doi\":\"10.3329/bjar.v45i3.62942\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Several management approaches were evaluated against pod borer attacking yard long bean during April - July, 2019 at Entomology Research Field, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI), Gazipur. The management package namely sanitation + spraying bio-pesticide Antario (Package 1), sanitation + spraying bio-pesticide Spinosad 45 SC (Package 3) and sanitation + alternate spraying of Antario and Spinosad 45SC (Package 4) showed almost equal effectiveness in reducing flower and pod damage by pod borer and higher yield. But the management package sanitation + spraying bio-pesticide Antario (Package 1) appeared best as it provided the highest marginal benefit cost ratio (MBCR) (10.09), which was followed by sanitation + alternate spraying of Antario and Spinosad 45SC (6.97) (Package 4), and sanitation + spraying biopesticide Spinosad 45 SC (5.29) (Package 3). The effectiveness of sanitation +Bt kurstaki) (Package 2) was poor in respect of yield (12.06 tha-1) and MBCR (3.44). \\nBangladesh J. Agril. Res. 45(3): 233-237, September 2020\",\"PeriodicalId\":103111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research\",\"volume\":\"228 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3329/bjar.v45i3.62942\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/bjar.v45i3.62942","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2019年4月至7月,在加济普尔孟加拉国农业研究所(BARI)昆虫学研究领域,对几种管理方法进行了评估,以防止豆荚螟攻击院子长豆。环卫+喷施生物农药Antario(第1包)、环卫+喷施生物农药Spinosad 45SC(第3包)和环卫+交替喷施Antario和Spinosad 45SC(第4包)在减少螟虫对花和荚果的危害和提高产量方面效果基本相同。其中卫生+喷洒生物农药Antario(包装1)的边际效益成本比(MBCR)最高(10.09),其次为卫生+交替喷洒Antario与Spinosad 45SC(包装4)(6.97),卫生+喷洒生物农药Spinosad 45SC(包装3)(5.29)。卫生+Bt kurstaki(包装2)在产量(12.06 tha-1)和MBCR(3.44)方面效果较差。孟加拉国J. Agril。Res. 45(3): 233-237, 2020年9月
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Management Approach Against Pod Borer, Eucrysops Cnejus F. Attacking Yard Long Bean
Several management approaches were evaluated against pod borer attacking yard long bean during April - July, 2019 at Entomology Research Field, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI), Gazipur. The management package namely sanitation + spraying bio-pesticide Antario (Package 1), sanitation + spraying bio-pesticide Spinosad 45 SC (Package 3) and sanitation + alternate spraying of Antario and Spinosad 45SC (Package 4) showed almost equal effectiveness in reducing flower and pod damage by pod borer and higher yield. But the management package sanitation + spraying bio-pesticide Antario (Package 1) appeared best as it provided the highest marginal benefit cost ratio (MBCR) (10.09), which was followed by sanitation + alternate spraying of Antario and Spinosad 45SC (6.97) (Package 4), and sanitation + spraying biopesticide Spinosad 45 SC (5.29) (Package 3). The effectiveness of sanitation +Bt kurstaki) (Package 2) was poor in respect of yield (12.06 tha-1) and MBCR (3.44). Bangladesh J. Agril. Res. 45(3): 233-237, September 2020
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信