机械通气患者呼气末正压对中心静脉压的影响

K. Al-Sayaghi, H. Mosa, M. Atrous, A. El-soussi, Ahmed Y. Ali, Sahar Hossni El-shenawi
{"title":"机械通气患者呼气末正压对中心静脉压的影响","authors":"K. Al-Sayaghi, H. Mosa, M. Atrous, A. El-soussi, Ahmed Y. Ali, Sahar Hossni El-shenawi","doi":"10.12691/AJNR-7-3-20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Central venous pressure (CVP) monitoring remains in common use as an index of circulatory filling and cardiac preload. Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in mechanically ventilated patients can affect CVP via increasing intra-thoracic pressure. Critical care nurses should be able to measure the CVP competently and identify the factors affecting its readings. Aim: The current study was conducted to determine the effect of PEEP on the CVP readings in mechanically ventilated patients. Methods: a descriptive design used in this study. A convenient sample of 200 adult critically ill patients of both sex, hemodynamically and respiratory stable, having a central venous catheter (CVC) in place, and attached to a mechanical ventilator and pulse oximeter were included in the study. The patient's baseline CVP was recorded while the patient connected to the mechanical ventilator, then the patients were temporary disconnected from the mechanical ventilator and the CVP measured again without the effect of PEEP. Results: About 40% of the study sample aged 45 to 64 years, 52.5% were males, 50 % suffered from respiratory disorders, and 49% were overhydrated. Eighty eight percent of the study sample was on PEEP levels between 5 to 2O. The CVP readings while the patients connected to MV were higher than CVP reading while the patients without PEEP, but these differences were not significant. Conclusion: CVP readings are not significant affected by the PEEP up to 15 cmH2O. The CVP can be reliably measured while patients are connected to MV. Recommendations: Measurement of CVP can be obtained while the patient is connected to MV.","PeriodicalId":210760,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Nursing Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Positive End Expiratory Pressure on Central Venous Pressure in Mechanically Ventilated Patients\",\"authors\":\"K. Al-Sayaghi, H. Mosa, M. Atrous, A. El-soussi, Ahmed Y. Ali, Sahar Hossni El-shenawi\",\"doi\":\"10.12691/AJNR-7-3-20\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Central venous pressure (CVP) monitoring remains in common use as an index of circulatory filling and cardiac preload. Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in mechanically ventilated patients can affect CVP via increasing intra-thoracic pressure. Critical care nurses should be able to measure the CVP competently and identify the factors affecting its readings. Aim: The current study was conducted to determine the effect of PEEP on the CVP readings in mechanically ventilated patients. Methods: a descriptive design used in this study. A convenient sample of 200 adult critically ill patients of both sex, hemodynamically and respiratory stable, having a central venous catheter (CVC) in place, and attached to a mechanical ventilator and pulse oximeter were included in the study. The patient's baseline CVP was recorded while the patient connected to the mechanical ventilator, then the patients were temporary disconnected from the mechanical ventilator and the CVP measured again without the effect of PEEP. Results: About 40% of the study sample aged 45 to 64 years, 52.5% were males, 50 % suffered from respiratory disorders, and 49% were overhydrated. Eighty eight percent of the study sample was on PEEP levels between 5 to 2O. The CVP readings while the patients connected to MV were higher than CVP reading while the patients without PEEP, but these differences were not significant. Conclusion: CVP readings are not significant affected by the PEEP up to 15 cmH2O. The CVP can be reliably measured while patients are connected to MV. Recommendations: Measurement of CVP can be obtained while the patient is connected to MV.\",\"PeriodicalId\":210760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Nursing Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Nursing Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12691/AJNR-7-3-20\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12691/AJNR-7-3-20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:中心静脉压(CVP)监测仍然是一种常用的循环充盈和心脏预负荷指标。机械通气患者呼气末正压(PEEP)可通过增加胸内压影响CVP。重症护理护士应能熟练地测量CVP并识别影响其读数的因素。目的:本研究旨在确定PEEP对机械通气患者CVP读数的影响。方法:本研究采用描述性设计。本研究选取了200名血液动力学和呼吸稳定、放置中心静脉导管(CVC)、连接机械呼吸机和脉搏血氧仪的成年危重患者作为便捷样本。在患者连接机械呼吸机时记录患者的基线CVP,然后暂时断开患者的机械呼吸机,在没有PEEP的情况下再次测量CVP。结果:约40%的研究样本年龄在45 - 64岁之间,52.5%为男性,50%患有呼吸系统疾病,49%患有过度水分。88%的研究样本的PEEP水平在5到20之间。与无PEEP患者相比,有肺动脉高压的患者CVP值明显增高,但差异不显著。结论:15 cmH2O的PEEP对CVP读数无显著影响。当患者连接到MV时,可以可靠地测量CVP。建议:CVP的测量可以在患者连接到MV时进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Positive End Expiratory Pressure on Central Venous Pressure in Mechanically Ventilated Patients
Background: Central venous pressure (CVP) monitoring remains in common use as an index of circulatory filling and cardiac preload. Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in mechanically ventilated patients can affect CVP via increasing intra-thoracic pressure. Critical care nurses should be able to measure the CVP competently and identify the factors affecting its readings. Aim: The current study was conducted to determine the effect of PEEP on the CVP readings in mechanically ventilated patients. Methods: a descriptive design used in this study. A convenient sample of 200 adult critically ill patients of both sex, hemodynamically and respiratory stable, having a central venous catheter (CVC) in place, and attached to a mechanical ventilator and pulse oximeter were included in the study. The patient's baseline CVP was recorded while the patient connected to the mechanical ventilator, then the patients were temporary disconnected from the mechanical ventilator and the CVP measured again without the effect of PEEP. Results: About 40% of the study sample aged 45 to 64 years, 52.5% were males, 50 % suffered from respiratory disorders, and 49% were overhydrated. Eighty eight percent of the study sample was on PEEP levels between 5 to 2O. The CVP readings while the patients connected to MV were higher than CVP reading while the patients without PEEP, but these differences were not significant. Conclusion: CVP readings are not significant affected by the PEEP up to 15 cmH2O. The CVP can be reliably measured while patients are connected to MV. Recommendations: Measurement of CVP can be obtained while the patient is connected to MV.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信