基于角色的职责分离约束的RSL99语言

Gail-Joon Ahn, R. Sandhu
{"title":"基于角色的职责分离约束的RSL99语言","authors":"Gail-Joon Ahn, R. Sandhu","doi":"10.1145/319171.319176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Separation of duty (SOD) is a fundamental technique for prevention of fraud and errors, known and practiced long before the existence of computers. It is discussed at several places in the literature, but there has been Iittle work on specifying SOD policies in a systematic way. This paper describes a framework for specifying separation of duty and conflict of interest policies in role-based systems. To specify these policies, we need an appropriate language. We propose an intuitive formal language which uses system functions and sets as its basic elements. The semantics for this language is defined by its translation to a restricted form of first order predicate logic. We show how previously identified SOD properties can be expressed in our language. Moreover, we show there are other significant SOD properties which have not been previously identified in the literature. Unlike much of the previous work, this paper deals with SOD in the presence of role hierarchies. Our work shows that there are many alternate formulations of even the simplest SOD properties, with varying degree of flexibility and assurance. Our language provides us a rigorous foundation for systematic study of SOD properties. *This work is partially supported by grants from the National Science Foundation and the National Security Agency at the Laboratory for Information Security Technology at George Mason University. All correspondence should be addressed to Ravi Sandhu, ISE Department, Mail Stop 4A4, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, saudhuQisse.gmu.edu, wwv.list.gmu.edu. Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. To copy otherwise. to republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. RBAC ‘99 10199 Fairfax, VA, USA","PeriodicalId":355233,"journal":{"name":"ACM Workshop on Role-Based Access Control","volume":"81 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"150","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The RSL99 language for role-based separation of duty constraints\",\"authors\":\"Gail-Joon Ahn, R. Sandhu\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/319171.319176\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Separation of duty (SOD) is a fundamental technique for prevention of fraud and errors, known and practiced long before the existence of computers. It is discussed at several places in the literature, but there has been Iittle work on specifying SOD policies in a systematic way. This paper describes a framework for specifying separation of duty and conflict of interest policies in role-based systems. To specify these policies, we need an appropriate language. We propose an intuitive formal language which uses system functions and sets as its basic elements. The semantics for this language is defined by its translation to a restricted form of first order predicate logic. We show how previously identified SOD properties can be expressed in our language. Moreover, we show there are other significant SOD properties which have not been previously identified in the literature. Unlike much of the previous work, this paper deals with SOD in the presence of role hierarchies. Our work shows that there are many alternate formulations of even the simplest SOD properties, with varying degree of flexibility and assurance. Our language provides us a rigorous foundation for systematic study of SOD properties. *This work is partially supported by grants from the National Science Foundation and the National Security Agency at the Laboratory for Information Security Technology at George Mason University. All correspondence should be addressed to Ravi Sandhu, ISE Department, Mail Stop 4A4, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, saudhuQisse.gmu.edu, wwv.list.gmu.edu. Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. To copy otherwise. to republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. RBAC ‘99 10199 Fairfax, VA, USA\",\"PeriodicalId\":355233,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Workshop on Role-Based Access Control\",\"volume\":\"81 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"150\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Workshop on Role-Based Access Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/319171.319176\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Workshop on Role-Based Access Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/319171.319176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 150

摘要

职责分离(SOD)是防止欺诈和错误的一项基本技术,早在计算机出现之前就已为人所知并得到实践。在文献中有几个地方讨论了这一点,但很少有系统地指定SOD政策的工作。本文描述了一个用于在基于角色的系统中指定职责分离和利益冲突策略的框架。要指定这些策略,我们需要一种适当的语言。我们提出了一种以系统函数和集合为基本元素的直观形式语言。这种语言的语义是通过将其转换为一阶谓词逻辑的限制形式来定义的。我们展示了如何在我们的语言中表达先前确定的SOD属性。此外,我们还发现了其他重要的SOD特性,这些特性在以前的文献中没有被发现。与之前的许多工作不同,本文在角色层次存在的情况下处理SOD。我们的工作表明,即使是最简单的SOD性质也有许多不同的配方,具有不同程度的灵活性和保证。我们的语言为我们系统地研究SOD的性质提供了严谨的基础。*这项工作部分由国家科学基金会和国家安全局在乔治梅森大学信息安全技术实验室资助。所有信件应寄给Ravi Sandhu, ISE系,邮寄站4A4,乔治梅森大学,费尔法克斯,弗吉尼亚州22030,saudhuqisisse.gmu.edu, wwv.list.gmu.edu。允许免费制作本作品的全部或部分数字或硬拷贝供个人或课堂使用,前提是副本不是为了盈利或商业利益而制作或分发的,并且副本在第一页上带有本通知和完整的引用。复制,否则。重新发布,在服务器上发布或重新分发到列表,需要事先获得特定许可和/或付费。RBAC ' 99 10199费尔法克斯,弗吉尼亚州,美国
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The RSL99 language for role-based separation of duty constraints
Separation of duty (SOD) is a fundamental technique for prevention of fraud and errors, known and practiced long before the existence of computers. It is discussed at several places in the literature, but there has been Iittle work on specifying SOD policies in a systematic way. This paper describes a framework for specifying separation of duty and conflict of interest policies in role-based systems. To specify these policies, we need an appropriate language. We propose an intuitive formal language which uses system functions and sets as its basic elements. The semantics for this language is defined by its translation to a restricted form of first order predicate logic. We show how previously identified SOD properties can be expressed in our language. Moreover, we show there are other significant SOD properties which have not been previously identified in the literature. Unlike much of the previous work, this paper deals with SOD in the presence of role hierarchies. Our work shows that there are many alternate formulations of even the simplest SOD properties, with varying degree of flexibility and assurance. Our language provides us a rigorous foundation for systematic study of SOD properties. *This work is partially supported by grants from the National Science Foundation and the National Security Agency at the Laboratory for Information Security Technology at George Mason University. All correspondence should be addressed to Ravi Sandhu, ISE Department, Mail Stop 4A4, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, saudhuQisse.gmu.edu, wwv.list.gmu.edu. Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. To copy otherwise. to republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. RBAC ‘99 10199 Fairfax, VA, USA
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信