有效性原则:在压力下?

M. Eliantonio, E. Muir
{"title":"有效性原则:在压力下?","authors":"M. Eliantonio, E. Muir","doi":"10.7590/187479819x15840066091268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This special issue sheds light on the evolving role of the principle of effectiveness in EU law in recent years and its relationship between the closely related principle of effective judicial protection, the right to an effective remedy under Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights (CFR), EU secondary procedural rules, and more recently the Member States’ duty to ensure effective legal protection contained in Article 19 TEU. The principle of effectiveness is very well established in EU law and dates back from the Rewe case, which enunciated that","PeriodicalId":294114,"journal":{"name":"Review of European Administrative Law","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Principle of Effectiveness: under Strain?\",\"authors\":\"M. Eliantonio, E. Muir\",\"doi\":\"10.7590/187479819x15840066091268\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This special issue sheds light on the evolving role of the principle of effectiveness in EU law in recent years and its relationship between the closely related principle of effective judicial protection, the right to an effective remedy under Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights (CFR), EU secondary procedural rules, and more recently the Member States’ duty to ensure effective legal protection contained in Article 19 TEU. The principle of effectiveness is very well established in EU law and dates back from the Rewe case, which enunciated that\",\"PeriodicalId\":294114,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of European Administrative Law\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of European Administrative Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7590/187479819x15840066091268\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of European Administrative Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7590/187479819x15840066091268","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本期特刊揭示了近年来有效性原则在欧盟法律中的演变作用,以及与之密切相关的有效司法保护原则、《基本权利宪章》(CFR)第47条规定的获得有效救济的权利、欧盟次级程序规则,以及最近成员国确保第19条TEU规定的有效法律保护的义务之间的关系。有效性原则在欧盟法律中得到了很好的确立,可以追溯到Rewe案,它阐明了这一点
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Principle of Effectiveness: under Strain?
This special issue sheds light on the evolving role of the principle of effectiveness in EU law in recent years and its relationship between the closely related principle of effective judicial protection, the right to an effective remedy under Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights (CFR), EU secondary procedural rules, and more recently the Member States’ duty to ensure effective legal protection contained in Article 19 TEU. The principle of effectiveness is very well established in EU law and dates back from the Rewe case, which enunciated that
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信