Sharia基金与传统共同基金在形成最优投资组合中的比较

S. Surono, Rika Juwita, Ruslan Abdul Ghofur, Erike Anggraini
{"title":"Sharia基金与传统共同基金在形成最优投资组合中的比较","authors":"S. Surono, Rika Juwita, Ruslan Abdul Ghofur, Erike Anggraini","doi":"10.47467/alkharaj.v4i3.711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to analyze the differences in the performance of Islamic stock mutual funds and conventional stock mutual funds in forming an optimal portfolio using the Sharpe and Treynor models. Purposive sampling was used in determining the data sample which was then analyzed using the descriptive method with a comparative study during the period January 2018 to December 2019. Hypothesis testing used a different test to determine the difference between the two using the SPSS Application Tool. The results showed that the calculation of the performance of stock mutual funds using the Sharpe method, both Islamic and conventional stock mutual funds, there was no significant difference. Likewise, the results of the calculation of the performance of stock mutual funds using the Treynor method show that there is no difference between the performance of Islamic stock mutual funds and conventional stock mutual funds. This is one proof of the development of the Islamic economy in Indonesia, especially in the capital market, so that Islamic mutual funds can compete with conventional mutual funds.","PeriodicalId":286012,"journal":{"name":"Al-Kharaj : Jurnal Ekonomi, Keuangan & Bisnis Syariah","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison Of Sharia Performance And Conventional Mutual Funds In Forming Optimal Portfolio\",\"authors\":\"S. Surono, Rika Juwita, Ruslan Abdul Ghofur, Erike Anggraini\",\"doi\":\"10.47467/alkharaj.v4i3.711\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research aims to analyze the differences in the performance of Islamic stock mutual funds and conventional stock mutual funds in forming an optimal portfolio using the Sharpe and Treynor models. Purposive sampling was used in determining the data sample which was then analyzed using the descriptive method with a comparative study during the period January 2018 to December 2019. Hypothesis testing used a different test to determine the difference between the two using the SPSS Application Tool. The results showed that the calculation of the performance of stock mutual funds using the Sharpe method, both Islamic and conventional stock mutual funds, there was no significant difference. Likewise, the results of the calculation of the performance of stock mutual funds using the Treynor method show that there is no difference between the performance of Islamic stock mutual funds and conventional stock mutual funds. This is one proof of the development of the Islamic economy in Indonesia, especially in the capital market, so that Islamic mutual funds can compete with conventional mutual funds.\",\"PeriodicalId\":286012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Al-Kharaj : Jurnal Ekonomi, Keuangan & Bisnis Syariah\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Al-Kharaj : Jurnal Ekonomi, Keuangan & Bisnis Syariah\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47467/alkharaj.v4i3.711\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Kharaj : Jurnal Ekonomi, Keuangan & Bisnis Syariah","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47467/alkharaj.v4i3.711","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究旨在运用Sharpe和Treynor模型分析伊斯兰股票型共同基金与传统股票型共同基金在形成最优投资组合时的表现差异。在2018年1月至2019年12月期间,采用目的抽样确定数据样本,然后使用描述性方法和比较研究对数据样本进行分析。假设检验使用不同的检验来确定两者之间的差异,使用SPSS应用工具。结果表明,使用夏普方法计算股票型共同基金的业绩,无论是伊斯兰教的股票型共同基金还是传统的股票型共同基金,都没有显著差异。同样,用Treynor方法计算股票型共同基金的业绩结果表明,伊斯兰股票型共同基金的业绩与传统股票型共同基金的业绩没有差别。这是印度尼西亚伊斯兰经济发展的一个证明,特别是在资本市场上,伊斯兰共同基金可以与传统共同基金竞争。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison Of Sharia Performance And Conventional Mutual Funds In Forming Optimal Portfolio
This research aims to analyze the differences in the performance of Islamic stock mutual funds and conventional stock mutual funds in forming an optimal portfolio using the Sharpe and Treynor models. Purposive sampling was used in determining the data sample which was then analyzed using the descriptive method with a comparative study during the period January 2018 to December 2019. Hypothesis testing used a different test to determine the difference between the two using the SPSS Application Tool. The results showed that the calculation of the performance of stock mutual funds using the Sharpe method, both Islamic and conventional stock mutual funds, there was no significant difference. Likewise, the results of the calculation of the performance of stock mutual funds using the Treynor method show that there is no difference between the performance of Islamic stock mutual funds and conventional stock mutual funds. This is one proof of the development of the Islamic economy in Indonesia, especially in the capital market, so that Islamic mutual funds can compete with conventional mutual funds.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信