全膝关节置换术后膝关节矢状位运动学的无创评估

V. Chester, E. Biden, T. Barnhill
{"title":"全膝关节置换术后膝关节矢状位运动学的无创评估","authors":"V. Chester, E. Biden, T. Barnhill","doi":"10.5580/500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Normative and arthroplasty knee joint kinematics have been studied extensively using a wide range of instrumentation and methodologies. Many of the methods used to assess knee mechanics after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have failed to create realistic testing conditions in terms of joint load and range of motion. In contrast, motion capture studies facilitate knee assessments during functional, weight-bearing activities. Using motion capture techniques, this study aimed to examine differences in sagittal tendon kinematics between TKA and normative individuals. The relative positions of the patellar tendon and quadriceps tendon, as a function of knee flexion-extension, were estimated during step down and bilateral deep knee bend tasks. To assess the validity of this technique, motion capture data were compared to radiographic data for each TKA patient. Sagittal knee tendon angles were measured directly from the radiographs and compared to corresponding points in the dynamic data. Results of the patellar and quadriceps tendon angles showed good agreement between the two methods, with absolute errors ranging from 2.9o to 5.6o, suggesting that noninvasive motion capture is a suitable method for evaluating knee mechanics.","PeriodicalId":322846,"journal":{"name":"The Internet Journal of Orthopedic Surgery","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Noninvasive Assessment of Sagittal Knee Kinematics After Total Knee Arthroplasty\",\"authors\":\"V. Chester, E. Biden, T. Barnhill\",\"doi\":\"10.5580/500\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Normative and arthroplasty knee joint kinematics have been studied extensively using a wide range of instrumentation and methodologies. Many of the methods used to assess knee mechanics after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have failed to create realistic testing conditions in terms of joint load and range of motion. In contrast, motion capture studies facilitate knee assessments during functional, weight-bearing activities. Using motion capture techniques, this study aimed to examine differences in sagittal tendon kinematics between TKA and normative individuals. The relative positions of the patellar tendon and quadriceps tendon, as a function of knee flexion-extension, were estimated during step down and bilateral deep knee bend tasks. To assess the validity of this technique, motion capture data were compared to radiographic data for each TKA patient. Sagittal knee tendon angles were measured directly from the radiographs and compared to corresponding points in the dynamic data. Results of the patellar and quadriceps tendon angles showed good agreement between the two methods, with absolute errors ranging from 2.9o to 5.6o, suggesting that noninvasive motion capture is a suitable method for evaluating knee mechanics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":322846,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Internet Journal of Orthopedic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Internet Journal of Orthopedic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5580/500\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Internet Journal of Orthopedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5580/500","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

规范和关节置换术膝关节运动学已经广泛研究使用各种仪器和方法。许多用于评估全膝关节置换术(TKA)后膝关节力学的方法未能在关节负荷和活动范围方面创造现实的测试条件。相反,运动捕捉研究有助于在功能性、负重活动期间对膝关节进行评估。使用动作捕捉技术,本研究旨在检查TKA和正常个体之间矢状肌腱运动学的差异。髌骨肌腱和股四头肌肌腱的相对位置,作为膝关节屈伸的功能,在降压和双侧深膝关节弯曲任务中进行估计。为了评估该技术的有效性,将每个TKA患者的运动捕捉数据与x线片数据进行比较。膝关节矢状肌腱角度直接从x线片测量,并与动态数据中的相应点进行比较。两种方法的髌骨和股四头肌肌腱角度结果吻合良好,绝对误差在2.90到5.60之间,表明无创运动捕捉是评估膝关节力学的合适方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Noninvasive Assessment of Sagittal Knee Kinematics After Total Knee Arthroplasty
Normative and arthroplasty knee joint kinematics have been studied extensively using a wide range of instrumentation and methodologies. Many of the methods used to assess knee mechanics after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have failed to create realistic testing conditions in terms of joint load and range of motion. In contrast, motion capture studies facilitate knee assessments during functional, weight-bearing activities. Using motion capture techniques, this study aimed to examine differences in sagittal tendon kinematics between TKA and normative individuals. The relative positions of the patellar tendon and quadriceps tendon, as a function of knee flexion-extension, were estimated during step down and bilateral deep knee bend tasks. To assess the validity of this technique, motion capture data were compared to radiographic data for each TKA patient. Sagittal knee tendon angles were measured directly from the radiographs and compared to corresponding points in the dynamic data. Results of the patellar and quadriceps tendon angles showed good agreement between the two methods, with absolute errors ranging from 2.9o to 5.6o, suggesting that noninvasive motion capture is a suitable method for evaluating knee mechanics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信