在ingroup和outgroup保护人们免受COVID-19的伤害

Faturochman Faturochman, Wenty Wenty Marina Minza
{"title":"在ingroup和outgroup保护人们免受COVID-19的伤害","authors":"Faturochman Faturochman, Wenty Wenty Marina Minza","doi":"10.7454/jps.2022.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Various efforts have been carried out to protect oneself and one’s group from the threat of COVID-19. In reality, it is possible that there are different mechanisms to protect the group. Ingroup favoritism is likely to occur, even in times of pandemic. This study aims to explore the differences in protective behaviors (toward ingroups vs. outgroups) and investigate the differentiating factors leading to protective behaviors. Through an online survey, a total of 593 respondents filled out a questionnaire that measures ingroup and outgroup protection, self-protection, and collective coping. The results of the data analysis show the tendency for ingroup favoritism in efforts to protect the group. Further analysis shows that efforts to protect the ingroup are influenced by collective coping and self-protection, while efforts to protect the outgroup are only influenced by collective coping. These findings strengthen the perspective that collectivity is the basis for protection from COVID-19 in general, while individual factors lead to greater ingroup protection.","PeriodicalId":282612,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Psikologi Sosial","volume":"298 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Upaya perlindungan terhadap COVID-19 pada ingroup dan outgroup\",\"authors\":\"Faturochman Faturochman, Wenty Wenty Marina Minza\",\"doi\":\"10.7454/jps.2022.13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Various efforts have been carried out to protect oneself and one’s group from the threat of COVID-19. In reality, it is possible that there are different mechanisms to protect the group. Ingroup favoritism is likely to occur, even in times of pandemic. This study aims to explore the differences in protective behaviors (toward ingroups vs. outgroups) and investigate the differentiating factors leading to protective behaviors. Through an online survey, a total of 593 respondents filled out a questionnaire that measures ingroup and outgroup protection, self-protection, and collective coping. The results of the data analysis show the tendency for ingroup favoritism in efforts to protect the group. Further analysis shows that efforts to protect the ingroup are influenced by collective coping and self-protection, while efforts to protect the outgroup are only influenced by collective coping. These findings strengthen the perspective that collectivity is the basis for protection from COVID-19 in general, while individual factors lead to greater ingroup protection.\",\"PeriodicalId\":282612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Psikologi Sosial\",\"volume\":\"298 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Psikologi Sosial\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7454/jps.2022.13\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Psikologi Sosial","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7454/jps.2022.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们采取各种措施保护自己和家人免受新冠肺炎的威胁。在现实中,有可能有不同的机制来保护这个群体。即使在大流行时期,也可能出现群体内偏袒。本研究旨在探讨保护行为(对内群体和外群体)的差异,并探讨导致保护行为的差异因素。通过一项在线调查,共有593名受访者填写了一份调查问卷,调查内容包括群体内保护和群体外保护、自我保护和集体应对。数据分析的结果表明,在保护群体的努力中存在群体内偏袒的倾向。进一步分析表明,保护内群体的努力受到集体应对和自我保护的影响,而保护外群体的努力只受到集体应对的影响。这些发现强化了这样一种观点,即总体而言,集体是防范COVID-19的基础,而个体因素会导致更大的群体内保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Upaya perlindungan terhadap COVID-19 pada ingroup dan outgroup
Various efforts have been carried out to protect oneself and one’s group from the threat of COVID-19. In reality, it is possible that there are different mechanisms to protect the group. Ingroup favoritism is likely to occur, even in times of pandemic. This study aims to explore the differences in protective behaviors (toward ingroups vs. outgroups) and investigate the differentiating factors leading to protective behaviors. Through an online survey, a total of 593 respondents filled out a questionnaire that measures ingroup and outgroup protection, self-protection, and collective coping. The results of the data analysis show the tendency for ingroup favoritism in efforts to protect the group. Further analysis shows that efforts to protect the ingroup are influenced by collective coping and self-protection, while efforts to protect the outgroup are only influenced by collective coping. These findings strengthen the perspective that collectivity is the basis for protection from COVID-19 in general, while individual factors lead to greater ingroup protection.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信