埃塞俄比亚中部高原硝土上磷肥和杂草防治对大田豌豆生长和产量的影响

G. Agegnehu
{"title":"埃塞俄比亚中部高原硝土上磷肥和杂草防治对大田豌豆生长和产量的影响","authors":"G. Agegnehu","doi":"10.4314/SINET.V32I2.68860","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Soil acidity and the associated low phosphorus availability and poor crop management practices are among the major factors constraining field pea productivity in the highlands of Ethiopia. The effect of phosphate fertilizer and weed control on yield and yield components of field pea ( Pisum sativum L.) were studied on acidic Nitisols of farmers’ fields of Welmera Woreda, West Shoa. Factorial combinations of four levels of phosphate fertilizer (0, 10, 20 and 30 kg P ha -1 ) as triple super-phosphate (TSP) and two levels of weeding (w 0 = no weeding and w 1 = hand weeding once) were laid out in randomized complete block design with three replications. Results indicated that a highly significant positive response of plant height, number of pods per plant, total biomass and grain yields of field pea were noted to phosphate fertilizer and weeding treatments. Application of phosphate fertilizer at the rates of 10, 20 and 30 kg P ha -1 increased mean grain yields of field pea by 36, 67 and 57%, respectively compared to the control. Weeding once by hand increased mean grain yield of field pea by 15% compared to the unweeded check. The interaction between applied phosphate fertilizer and weed control (P×W) significantly affected field pea grain yield and total biomass. Grain yield was very significantly and positively correlated with plant height, number of pods per plant and total biomass (r = 0.59 ** , 0.68 *** and 0.94 *** , respectively). The results of economic analysis indicated that the treatment with application of 20 kg P ha -1 and weeding once during the 4 th week after sowing by hand was identified to be the best option with a marginal rate of return of 277%, well above the minimum acceptable rate of return of 100%, which is economically the most feasible alternative.","PeriodicalId":245987,"journal":{"name":"Sinet, Ethiopian Journal of Science","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phosphate fertilizer and weed control effects on growth and yield of field pea on Nitisols of central highlands of Ethiopia\",\"authors\":\"G. Agegnehu\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/SINET.V32I2.68860\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Soil acidity and the associated low phosphorus availability and poor crop management practices are among the major factors constraining field pea productivity in the highlands of Ethiopia. The effect of phosphate fertilizer and weed control on yield and yield components of field pea ( Pisum sativum L.) were studied on acidic Nitisols of farmers’ fields of Welmera Woreda, West Shoa. Factorial combinations of four levels of phosphate fertilizer (0, 10, 20 and 30 kg P ha -1 ) as triple super-phosphate (TSP) and two levels of weeding (w 0 = no weeding and w 1 = hand weeding once) were laid out in randomized complete block design with three replications. Results indicated that a highly significant positive response of plant height, number of pods per plant, total biomass and grain yields of field pea were noted to phosphate fertilizer and weeding treatments. Application of phosphate fertilizer at the rates of 10, 20 and 30 kg P ha -1 increased mean grain yields of field pea by 36, 67 and 57%, respectively compared to the control. Weeding once by hand increased mean grain yield of field pea by 15% compared to the unweeded check. The interaction between applied phosphate fertilizer and weed control (P×W) significantly affected field pea grain yield and total biomass. Grain yield was very significantly and positively correlated with plant height, number of pods per plant and total biomass (r = 0.59 ** , 0.68 *** and 0.94 *** , respectively). The results of economic analysis indicated that the treatment with application of 20 kg P ha -1 and weeding once during the 4 th week after sowing by hand was identified to be the best option with a marginal rate of return of 277%, well above the minimum acceptable rate of return of 100%, which is economically the most feasible alternative.\",\"PeriodicalId\":245987,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sinet, Ethiopian Journal of Science\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sinet, Ethiopian Journal of Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/SINET.V32I2.68860\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sinet, Ethiopian Journal of Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/SINET.V32I2.68860","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

土壤酸度和相关的低磷有效性以及不良的作物管理做法是制约埃塞俄比亚高地田间豌豆生产力的主要因素。研究了磷肥和除草对大田豌豆产量及产量成分的影响。4个水平磷肥(0、10、20和30 kg P ha -1)作为三倍超磷肥(TSP)和2个水平除草(w0 =不除草,w1 =手除草一次)的因子组合采用随机完全区组设计,3个重复。结果表明,磷肥和除草处理对大田豌豆株高、单株荚果数、总生物量和籽粒产量均有极显著的正响应。施用磷肥10、20和30 kg P / h -1的大田豌豆平均产量比对照分别提高了36%、67%和57%。与未除草相比,手工除草一次可使大田豌豆的平均粒产量提高15%。施用磷肥与杂草防治(P×W)交互作用对大田豌豆籽粒产量和总生物量有显著影响。籽粒产量与株高、单株荚果数、总生物量呈极显著正相关(r分别为0.59 **、0.68 **、0.94 **)。经济分析结果表明,施磷20 kg hm -1,手播后第4周除草1次,边际收益率为277%,远高于最低可接受收益率100%,是经济上最可行的方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Phosphate fertilizer and weed control effects on growth and yield of field pea on Nitisols of central highlands of Ethiopia
Soil acidity and the associated low phosphorus availability and poor crop management practices are among the major factors constraining field pea productivity in the highlands of Ethiopia. The effect of phosphate fertilizer and weed control on yield and yield components of field pea ( Pisum sativum L.) were studied on acidic Nitisols of farmers’ fields of Welmera Woreda, West Shoa. Factorial combinations of four levels of phosphate fertilizer (0, 10, 20 and 30 kg P ha -1 ) as triple super-phosphate (TSP) and two levels of weeding (w 0 = no weeding and w 1 = hand weeding once) were laid out in randomized complete block design with three replications. Results indicated that a highly significant positive response of plant height, number of pods per plant, total biomass and grain yields of field pea were noted to phosphate fertilizer and weeding treatments. Application of phosphate fertilizer at the rates of 10, 20 and 30 kg P ha -1 increased mean grain yields of field pea by 36, 67 and 57%, respectively compared to the control. Weeding once by hand increased mean grain yield of field pea by 15% compared to the unweeded check. The interaction between applied phosphate fertilizer and weed control (P×W) significantly affected field pea grain yield and total biomass. Grain yield was very significantly and positively correlated with plant height, number of pods per plant and total biomass (r = 0.59 ** , 0.68 *** and 0.94 *** , respectively). The results of economic analysis indicated that the treatment with application of 20 kg P ha -1 and weeding once during the 4 th week after sowing by hand was identified to be the best option with a marginal rate of return of 277%, well above the minimum acceptable rate of return of 100%, which is economically the most feasible alternative.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信