分析观测到的飞机对飞机的距离

S. Szurgyi, S. Shresta, D. Nešković, J. DeArmon, S. Williams
{"title":"分析观测到的飞机对飞机的距离","authors":"S. Szurgyi, S. Shresta, D. Nešković, J. DeArmon, S. Williams","doi":"10.1109/ICNSURV.2008.4559166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As air traffic demand continues to increase in the coming years, the need for concepts, procedures and tools that can improve airspace efficiency will likewise increase. Reduction of terminal and en-route separation minima has been the focus of many of the concepts and emerging technologies developed to respond to this need. Horizontal separation distances consist of two major elements: lateral separation (i.e. track-to- track) influenced by the spacing of parallel or converging routes and individual aircraft route conformance; and longitudinal separation (i.e. along-track) influenced by both Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Orders regarding standard separations minima and an additional spacing buffer which reflects controller comfort with position variability and work load. This paper presents the preliminary results of an investigation of current terminal and en-route separations observed on conventional and Area Navigation (RNAV) routes and procedures. This analysis has been undertaken to determine the magnitude of spacing buffers as they are applied today, and then model a future throughput capability that could result from reducing the currently applied separations toward the established minimums.","PeriodicalId":201010,"journal":{"name":"2008 Integrated Communications, Navigation and Surveillance Conference","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of observed aircraft-to-aircraft separations\",\"authors\":\"S. Szurgyi, S. Shresta, D. Nešković, J. DeArmon, S. Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICNSURV.2008.4559166\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As air traffic demand continues to increase in the coming years, the need for concepts, procedures and tools that can improve airspace efficiency will likewise increase. Reduction of terminal and en-route separation minima has been the focus of many of the concepts and emerging technologies developed to respond to this need. Horizontal separation distances consist of two major elements: lateral separation (i.e. track-to- track) influenced by the spacing of parallel or converging routes and individual aircraft route conformance; and longitudinal separation (i.e. along-track) influenced by both Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Orders regarding standard separations minima and an additional spacing buffer which reflects controller comfort with position variability and work load. This paper presents the preliminary results of an investigation of current terminal and en-route separations observed on conventional and Area Navigation (RNAV) routes and procedures. This analysis has been undertaken to determine the magnitude of spacing buffers as they are applied today, and then model a future throughput capability that could result from reducing the currently applied separations toward the established minimums.\",\"PeriodicalId\":201010,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2008 Integrated Communications, Navigation and Surveillance Conference\",\"volume\":\"77 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2008 Integrated Communications, Navigation and Surveillance Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNSURV.2008.4559166\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 Integrated Communications, Navigation and Surveillance Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNSURV.2008.4559166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

随着未来几年空中交通需求的持续增长,对能够提高空域效率的概念、程序和工具的需求也将增加。为了满足这一需求,许多概念和新兴技术的重点是减少终端和航线上的最小分离。水平分离距离包括两个主要因素:横向分离(即航迹对航迹),受平行或会聚航线间距和单个飞机航线一致性的影响;以及受联邦航空管理局(FAA)关于标准最小间隔和额外间隔缓冲的命令影响的纵向间隔(即沿轨道),该命令反映了控制器对位置变化和工作负载的舒适度。本文介绍了对常规和区域导航(RNAV)路线和程序中观察到的当前终端和航路分离的初步调查结果。进行此分析是为了确定目前应用的间距缓冲的大小,然后对未来的吞吐能力进行建模,从而将当前应用的间距减少到既定的最小值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of observed aircraft-to-aircraft separations
As air traffic demand continues to increase in the coming years, the need for concepts, procedures and tools that can improve airspace efficiency will likewise increase. Reduction of terminal and en-route separation minima has been the focus of many of the concepts and emerging technologies developed to respond to this need. Horizontal separation distances consist of two major elements: lateral separation (i.e. track-to- track) influenced by the spacing of parallel or converging routes and individual aircraft route conformance; and longitudinal separation (i.e. along-track) influenced by both Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Orders regarding standard separations minima and an additional spacing buffer which reflects controller comfort with position variability and work load. This paper presents the preliminary results of an investigation of current terminal and en-route separations observed on conventional and Area Navigation (RNAV) routes and procedures. This analysis has been undertaken to determine the magnitude of spacing buffers as they are applied today, and then model a future throughput capability that could result from reducing the currently applied separations toward the established minimums.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信