担保学生贷款和补贴:租金由谁来承担?

D. Austin
{"title":"担保学生贷款和补贴:租金由谁来承担?","authors":"D. Austin","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1288368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper analyzes effects of borrower interest rates and student lender subsidies on federally guaranteed student loan volumes from 1988 to 1994 and from 1996 to 2006. In present and past policy debates, some have contended that lender subsidy cuts would cause some lenders to reduce loan supply or to leave the student loan market. A simple model of the student loan market suggests that if lenders receive economic rents due to overly generous subsidies, small changes in subsidy levels should not affect loan supply. The empirical results based on a variety of GMM panel estimators find evidence of a link between higher SAP margins and higher loan volumes is weak or inconclusive for both the 1988-1994 and 1996-2006 periods. This suggests that subsidy reductions had no discernable effect on student loan volumes. Results also suggest that higher real borrower interest rates reduce student loan volumes for public colleges and universities.","PeriodicalId":347116,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Other Social Welfare Policy (Topic)","volume":"138 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Guaranteed Student Loans and Subsidies: Who Captures the Rents?\",\"authors\":\"D. Austin\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1288368\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper analyzes effects of borrower interest rates and student lender subsidies on federally guaranteed student loan volumes from 1988 to 1994 and from 1996 to 2006. In present and past policy debates, some have contended that lender subsidy cuts would cause some lenders to reduce loan supply or to leave the student loan market. A simple model of the student loan market suggests that if lenders receive economic rents due to overly generous subsidies, small changes in subsidy levels should not affect loan supply. The empirical results based on a variety of GMM panel estimators find evidence of a link between higher SAP margins and higher loan volumes is weak or inconclusive for both the 1988-1994 and 1996-2006 periods. This suggests that subsidy reductions had no discernable effect on student loan volumes. Results also suggest that higher real borrower interest rates reduce student loan volumes for public colleges and universities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":347116,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PSN: Other Social Welfare Policy (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"138 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PSN: Other Social Welfare Policy (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1288368\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Other Social Welfare Policy (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1288368","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了1988年至1994年和1996年至2006年期间借款人利率和学生贷款机构补贴对联邦担保学生贷款额的影响。在当前和过去的政策辩论中,一些人认为,削减贷款机构补贴将导致一些贷款机构减少贷款供应或离开学生贷款市场。学生贷款市场的一个简单模型表明,如果贷款人因过度慷慨的补贴而获得经济租金,补贴水平的微小变化不应影响贷款供应。基于各种GMM面板估计值的实证结果发现,在1988-1994年和1996-2006年期间,SAP利润率较高与贷贷量较高之间存在联系的证据很弱或不确定。这表明,减少补贴对学生贷款额没有明显影响。研究结果还表明,较高的实际借款人利率减少了公立学院和大学的学生贷款额。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Guaranteed Student Loans and Subsidies: Who Captures the Rents?
The paper analyzes effects of borrower interest rates and student lender subsidies on federally guaranteed student loan volumes from 1988 to 1994 and from 1996 to 2006. In present and past policy debates, some have contended that lender subsidy cuts would cause some lenders to reduce loan supply or to leave the student loan market. A simple model of the student loan market suggests that if lenders receive economic rents due to overly generous subsidies, small changes in subsidy levels should not affect loan supply. The empirical results based on a variety of GMM panel estimators find evidence of a link between higher SAP margins and higher loan volumes is weak or inconclusive for both the 1988-1994 and 1996-2006 periods. This suggests that subsidy reductions had no discernable effect on student loan volumes. Results also suggest that higher real borrower interest rates reduce student loan volumes for public colleges and universities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信