E. Hopkins, Jacqueline Mazzeo, Vinh Nguyen, Emma Peck, Kelcie Satterthwaite, Carlos Lidón, G. J. Gerling
{"title":"开发一个基于标准的用户体验设计评估工具,平衡标准化和创造性","authors":"E. Hopkins, Jacqueline Mazzeo, Vinh Nguyen, Emma Peck, Kelcie Satterthwaite, Carlos Lidón, G. J. Gerling","doi":"10.1109/SIEDS52267.2021.9483752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Design systems are increasing in popularity, created to ensure a consistent aesthetic of graphics and interactions in websites and apps, and guide product development. They tend to include a set of standards, principles, and documentation. Due to their often-rigid requirements on structure and uniformity, traditional design systems can discourage creativity and customization. To forge a balance, the work develops a criteria-based evaluation tool, or ‘scorecard’ for assessing design components that incorporate principles of consistent, standardized practice, yet prioritize creative freedom. The evaluation scorecard allows inconsistencies to be managed in a collaborative and consensus-based manner. Users select parameters and metrics to evaluate the various elements of a design component. The tool calculates a score based on the number of parameters passed or failed. Scores below team-desired thresholds signal a need for further modification or redesign. Usability feedback using talk-aloud and surveys in a focus group format assess the ease of use and efficiency of the tool and identify gaps in functionality.","PeriodicalId":426747,"journal":{"name":"2021 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","volume":"244 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing a Criteria-Based Evaluation Tool for User Experience Design that Balances Standardization and Creativity\",\"authors\":\"E. Hopkins, Jacqueline Mazzeo, Vinh Nguyen, Emma Peck, Kelcie Satterthwaite, Carlos Lidón, G. J. Gerling\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SIEDS52267.2021.9483752\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Design systems are increasing in popularity, created to ensure a consistent aesthetic of graphics and interactions in websites and apps, and guide product development. They tend to include a set of standards, principles, and documentation. Due to their often-rigid requirements on structure and uniformity, traditional design systems can discourage creativity and customization. To forge a balance, the work develops a criteria-based evaluation tool, or ‘scorecard’ for assessing design components that incorporate principles of consistent, standardized practice, yet prioritize creative freedom. The evaluation scorecard allows inconsistencies to be managed in a collaborative and consensus-based manner. Users select parameters and metrics to evaluate the various elements of a design component. The tool calculates a score based on the number of parameters passed or failed. Scores below team-desired thresholds signal a need for further modification or redesign. Usability feedback using talk-aloud and surveys in a focus group format assess the ease of use and efficiency of the tool and identify gaps in functionality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":426747,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)\",\"volume\":\"244 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIEDS52267.2021.9483752\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIEDS52267.2021.9483752","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Developing a Criteria-Based Evaluation Tool for User Experience Design that Balances Standardization and Creativity
Design systems are increasing in popularity, created to ensure a consistent aesthetic of graphics and interactions in websites and apps, and guide product development. They tend to include a set of standards, principles, and documentation. Due to their often-rigid requirements on structure and uniformity, traditional design systems can discourage creativity and customization. To forge a balance, the work develops a criteria-based evaluation tool, or ‘scorecard’ for assessing design components that incorporate principles of consistent, standardized practice, yet prioritize creative freedom. The evaluation scorecard allows inconsistencies to be managed in a collaborative and consensus-based manner. Users select parameters and metrics to evaluate the various elements of a design component. The tool calculates a score based on the number of parameters passed or failed. Scores below team-desired thresholds signal a need for further modification or redesign. Usability feedback using talk-aloud and surveys in a focus group format assess the ease of use and efficiency of the tool and identify gaps in functionality.