根据第31条第2000款保护工业设计的法律

Ida Ayu Mas lndriani, Ni Made Jaya Senastri, Ni Made Puspasutari Ujianti
{"title":"根据第31条第2000款保护工业设计的法律","authors":"Ida Ayu Mas lndriani, Ni Made Jaya Senastri, Ni Made Puspasutari Ujianti","doi":"10.22225/juinhum.2.2.3430.297-301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intellectual property rights including industrial designs. The idea of ​​industrial design safety is based on the belief that human imagination, taste and initiative are closely linked to industrial design. The state grants protection against new industrial designs. The definition of the rule of law used in the legal protection of industrial designs is based on Law No. 31 of 2000. One of the components in this case is the protection of human rights which is the guideline for the legal protection of industrial designs. There are two forms of industrial design legal protection, which include preventive legal protection and repressive legal protection. This study aims to examine the form of legal protection for industrial designs based on Law No. 31 of 2000 and analyze the legal implications if the design rights holder does not register their industrial designs. This research was designed using normative research with a conceptual approach. The data used are primary and secondary data obtained through documentation and recording. The results of the study indicate that preventive legal protection is contained in the Act which is used to prevent violations and a description of the implementation of obligations while repressive legal protection is security in the form of sanctions for violations that have been committed. In view of this and considering the existence of protection in the form of the industrial design law, the designer can prevent the occurrence of plagiarism of his industrial design by registering his industrial design.","PeriodicalId":197649,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perlindungan Hukum atas Desain Industri Berdasarkan Undang-Undang No 31 T Ahun 2000\",\"authors\":\"Ida Ayu Mas lndriani, Ni Made Jaya Senastri, Ni Made Puspasutari Ujianti\",\"doi\":\"10.22225/juinhum.2.2.3430.297-301\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Intellectual property rights including industrial designs. The idea of ​​industrial design safety is based on the belief that human imagination, taste and initiative are closely linked to industrial design. The state grants protection against new industrial designs. The definition of the rule of law used in the legal protection of industrial designs is based on Law No. 31 of 2000. One of the components in this case is the protection of human rights which is the guideline for the legal protection of industrial designs. There are two forms of industrial design legal protection, which include preventive legal protection and repressive legal protection. This study aims to examine the form of legal protection for industrial designs based on Law No. 31 of 2000 and analyze the legal implications if the design rights holder does not register their industrial designs. This research was designed using normative research with a conceptual approach. The data used are primary and secondary data obtained through documentation and recording. The results of the study indicate that preventive legal protection is contained in the Act which is used to prevent violations and a description of the implementation of obligations while repressive legal protection is security in the form of sanctions for violations that have been committed. In view of this and considering the existence of protection in the form of the industrial design law, the designer can prevent the occurrence of plagiarism of his industrial design by registering his industrial design.\",\"PeriodicalId\":197649,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22225/juinhum.2.2.3430.297-301\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22225/juinhum.2.2.3430.297-301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

包括工业设计在内的知识产权。工业设计安全的理念是基于人类的想象力、品味和主动性与工业设计密切相关的信念。国家对新的工业品外观设计给予保护。工业品外观设计法律保护中使用的法治定义基于2000年第31号法律。本案的组成部分之一是保护人权,这是对工业品外观设计进行法律保护的指导方针。工业品外观设计法律保护有两种形式,即预防性法律保护和抑制性法律保护。本研究旨在考察2000年第31号法对工业品外观设计的法律保护形式,并分析外观设计权利人不注册其工业品外观设计的法律影响。本研究采用规范研究的概念方法进行设计。所使用的数据是通过文件和记录获得的第一手和二手数据。这项研究的结果表明,该法载有预防性法律保护,用于防止违反行为和说明履行义务的情况,而压制性法律保护是对已犯下的违反行为采取制裁形式的保障。鉴于此,并考虑到工业品外观设计法形式保护的存在,设计师可以通过工业品外观设计注册来防止其工业品外观设计被抄袭的发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perlindungan Hukum atas Desain Industri Berdasarkan Undang-Undang No 31 T Ahun 2000
Intellectual property rights including industrial designs. The idea of ​​industrial design safety is based on the belief that human imagination, taste and initiative are closely linked to industrial design. The state grants protection against new industrial designs. The definition of the rule of law used in the legal protection of industrial designs is based on Law No. 31 of 2000. One of the components in this case is the protection of human rights which is the guideline for the legal protection of industrial designs. There are two forms of industrial design legal protection, which include preventive legal protection and repressive legal protection. This study aims to examine the form of legal protection for industrial designs based on Law No. 31 of 2000 and analyze the legal implications if the design rights holder does not register their industrial designs. This research was designed using normative research with a conceptual approach. The data used are primary and secondary data obtained through documentation and recording. The results of the study indicate that preventive legal protection is contained in the Act which is used to prevent violations and a description of the implementation of obligations while repressive legal protection is security in the form of sanctions for violations that have been committed. In view of this and considering the existence of protection in the form of the industrial design law, the designer can prevent the occurrence of plagiarism of his industrial design by registering his industrial design.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信