利用缺失证据模型计算非监测年份偶然发现的尸体的一些方法

Open-File Report Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI:10.3133/ofr20201027

D. Dalthorp, Paul A Rabie, M. Huso, A. Tredennick

{"title":"利用缺失证据模型计算非监测年份偶然发现的尸体的一些方法","authors":"D. Dalthorp, Paul A Rabie, M. Huso, A. Tredennick","doi":"10.3133/ofr20201027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Executive Summary We evaluate three approaches to accounting for incidental carcasses when estimating an upper bound on total mortality ( 𝑀𝑀 ) as 𝑀𝑀 ∗ using the Evidence of Absence model (EoA; Dalthorp and others, 2017) to assess compliance with an Incidental Take Permit (ITP) (Dalthorp & Huso, 2015) under a monitoring protocol that includes formal, dedicated carcass surveys that achieve an overall detection probability of","PeriodicalId":142152,"journal":{"name":"Open-File Report","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Some approaches to accounting for incidental carcass discoveries in non-monitored years using the Evidence of Absence model\",\"authors\":\"D. Dalthorp, Paul A Rabie, M. Huso, A. Tredennick\",\"doi\":\"10.3133/ofr20201027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Executive Summary We evaluate three approaches to accounting for incidental carcasses when estimating an upper bound on total mortality ( 𝑀𝑀 ) as 𝑀𝑀 ∗ using the Evidence of Absence model (EoA; Dalthorp and others, 2017) to assess compliance with an Incidental Take Permit (ITP) (Dalthorp & Huso, 2015) under a monitoring protocol that includes formal, dedicated carcass surveys that achieve an overall detection probability of\",\"PeriodicalId\":142152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open-File Report\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open-File Report\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20201027\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open-File Report","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20201027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

在估计总死亡率(𝑀𝑀)的上限为𝑀𝑀*时，我们评估了三种计算偶然死亡的方法，使用缺席证据模型(EoA;Dalthorp等人，2017年)根据一项监测协议评估偶然捕捞许可证(ITP)的遵守情况(Dalthorp和Huso, 2015年)，该协议包括正式的、专门的胴体调查，总体检测概率为

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Some approaches to accounting for incidental carcass discoveries in non-monitored years using the Evidence of Absence model

Executive Summary We evaluate three approaches to accounting for incidental carcasses when estimating an upper bound on total mortality ( 𝑀𝑀 ) as 𝑀𝑀 ∗ using the Evidence of Absence model (EoA; Dalthorp and others, 2017) to assess compliance with an Incidental Take Permit (ITP) (Dalthorp & Huso, 2015) under a monitoring protocol that includes formal, dedicated carcass surveys that achieve an overall detection probability of

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Open-File Report

自引率

0.00%

发文量