Yevhenii B. Shapovalov, A. Salyuk, A. Kotynsky, R. Tarasenko
{"title":"干鸡粪产甲烷稳定性的研究","authors":"Yevhenii B. Shapovalov, A. Salyuk, A. Kotynsky, R. Tarasenko","doi":"10.23939/EP2019.01.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The studies were conducted in batch mode in thirteen repetitions at humidity of 78, 80, 82 and 84 %. The coefficient of variation of methane production varied from 14.84 % to 35.17 % in a mesophilic mode and from 14.4 % to 78.21 % in a thermophilic mode, which means high instability of the process. The moisture content had a much greater effect on the stability of the process in thermophilic conditions than in mesophilic ones.","PeriodicalId":334814,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Problems","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Reaserch of Dry Chicken MANURE Methanogenesis Stability\",\"authors\":\"Yevhenii B. Shapovalov, A. Salyuk, A. Kotynsky, R. Tarasenko\",\"doi\":\"10.23939/EP2019.01.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The studies were conducted in batch mode in thirteen repetitions at humidity of 78, 80, 82 and 84 %. The coefficient of variation of methane production varied from 14.84 % to 35.17 % in a mesophilic mode and from 14.4 % to 78.21 % in a thermophilic mode, which means high instability of the process. The moisture content had a much greater effect on the stability of the process in thermophilic conditions than in mesophilic ones.\",\"PeriodicalId\":334814,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Problems\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Problems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23939/EP2019.01.014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Problems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23939/EP2019.01.014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Reaserch of Dry Chicken MANURE Methanogenesis Stability
The studies were conducted in batch mode in thirteen repetitions at humidity of 78, 80, 82 and 84 %. The coefficient of variation of methane production varied from 14.84 % to 35.17 % in a mesophilic mode and from 14.4 % to 78.21 % in a thermophilic mode, which means high instability of the process. The moisture content had a much greater effect on the stability of the process in thermophilic conditions than in mesophilic ones.