Tawhidi伊斯兰经济学(TIE)的范围

M. Choudhury
{"title":"Tawhidi伊斯兰经济学(TIE)的范围","authors":"M. Choudhury","doi":"10.1142/9789813276024_0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The general epistemological methodology of scientific investigation in the comparative perspectives of Occidentalism and Islam that was formalized in Chapters 1 and 2 is now brought forth to establish the nature and scope of Tawhidi Islamic Economics (TIE). The starting point is to note that in comparative methodological perspectives, like all other disciplines of study, economics too has been cast in the framework of its own differentiated specialization (Holton, 1992). Thereby, in the name of disciplinary specialization, mainstream economics has been deprived of its embedded methodological worldview along with the important human elements of concern. These elements are morality, ethics, and the crosscurrents of issues with other disciplines, whether by way of a unique methodology and methodical study, or by way of formalizing economics as a generalized human science (Boulding, 1968). Yet, quite evidently, the various disciplines lack the methodology and the attenuating method to blend morality and ethics with the material forms and considerations regarding the embedding. Thereby, even more damaging has been the fact that no methodical discovery has been attained that can analytically study morality and ethics as neural system studies and thereby draw policies, strategies, and institutional forms that can present a wider field of endogenous learning phenomena (Choudhury, 2014b)…","PeriodicalId":328979,"journal":{"name":"Methodological Dimension of Islamic Economics","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Scope of Tawhidi Islamic Economics (TIE)\",\"authors\":\"M. Choudhury\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/9789813276024_0003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The general epistemological methodology of scientific investigation in the comparative perspectives of Occidentalism and Islam that was formalized in Chapters 1 and 2 is now brought forth to establish the nature and scope of Tawhidi Islamic Economics (TIE). The starting point is to note that in comparative methodological perspectives, like all other disciplines of study, economics too has been cast in the framework of its own differentiated specialization (Holton, 1992). Thereby, in the name of disciplinary specialization, mainstream economics has been deprived of its embedded methodological worldview along with the important human elements of concern. These elements are morality, ethics, and the crosscurrents of issues with other disciplines, whether by way of a unique methodology and methodical study, or by way of formalizing economics as a generalized human science (Boulding, 1968). Yet, quite evidently, the various disciplines lack the methodology and the attenuating method to blend morality and ethics with the material forms and considerations regarding the embedding. Thereby, even more damaging has been the fact that no methodical discovery has been attained that can analytically study morality and ethics as neural system studies and thereby draw policies, strategies, and institutional forms that can present a wider field of endogenous learning phenomena (Choudhury, 2014b)…\",\"PeriodicalId\":328979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Methodological Dimension of Islamic Economics\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Methodological Dimension of Islamic Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813276024_0003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methodological Dimension of Islamic Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813276024_0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在第一章和第二章中形成的西方主义和伊斯兰教比较视角下的科学调查的一般认识论方法论,现在被提出来建立Tawhidi伊斯兰经济学(TIE)的性质和范围。首先要注意的是,从比较方法论的角度来看,像所有其他学科一样,经济学也被置于其自身差异化专业化的框架中(霍尔顿,1992)。因此,在学科专业化的名义下,主流经济学被剥夺了其内在的方法论世界观以及重要的人类因素。这些要素是道德、伦理,以及与其他学科的交叉问题,无论是通过独特的方法和系统的研究,还是通过将经济学形式化为一门广义的人文科学(Boulding, 1968)。然而,很明显,各个学科缺乏将道德伦理与嵌入的物质形式和考虑相融合的方法论和衰减方法。因此,更具破坏性的事实是,没有获得系统的发现,可以像神经系统研究一样分析研究道德和伦理,从而得出可以呈现更广泛的内生学习现象领域的政策、战略和制度形式(乔杜里,2014)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Scope of Tawhidi Islamic Economics (TIE)
The general epistemological methodology of scientific investigation in the comparative perspectives of Occidentalism and Islam that was formalized in Chapters 1 and 2 is now brought forth to establish the nature and scope of Tawhidi Islamic Economics (TIE). The starting point is to note that in comparative methodological perspectives, like all other disciplines of study, economics too has been cast in the framework of its own differentiated specialization (Holton, 1992). Thereby, in the name of disciplinary specialization, mainstream economics has been deprived of its embedded methodological worldview along with the important human elements of concern. These elements are morality, ethics, and the crosscurrents of issues with other disciplines, whether by way of a unique methodology and methodical study, or by way of formalizing economics as a generalized human science (Boulding, 1968). Yet, quite evidently, the various disciplines lack the methodology and the attenuating method to blend morality and ethics with the material forms and considerations regarding the embedding. Thereby, even more damaging has been the fact that no methodical discovery has been attained that can analytically study morality and ethics as neural system studies and thereby draw policies, strategies, and institutional forms that can present a wider field of endogenous learning phenomena (Choudhury, 2014b)…
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信