批判性阅读作为有效综合的障碍:硕士生2的案例

Mokhtaria Rahmani
{"title":"批判性阅读作为有效综合的障碍:硕士生2的案例","authors":"Mokhtaria Rahmani","doi":"10.18844/gjflt.v11i3.5777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Writing an appropriate research paper requires evidently the mastery of effective synthesis. This paper intends to highlight students’ hindrances in producing a sound synthesis, particularly weak critical reading and proposes equally outlets for a sturdy comprehension. The motivation is linked with the slenderness of studies addressing critical reading/effective synthesis binary. This will have pedagogical implications regarding the teaching of synthesis. The researchers used purposive sampling with master two didactic students (39 students). Self-assessment of the teaching strategy, corpus analysis, and an eight-item student questionnaire were used. The findings indicated that the major problems surrounding the internalisation of good synthesis were related to the different operations required for critical reading. The paper put into evidence the necessity of integrating the subject of academic writing into the syllabi of Master didactic students, the design of adequate critical reading tasks, and urged equally the necessity of more condensed practice, both in-class and off-class.\n \nKeywords: Critical reading, effective synthesis, paraphrasing, shortness of instruction, master 2 students.","PeriodicalId":381886,"journal":{"name":"Global Journal of Foreign Language Teaching","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Critical reading as an impediment for effective synthesis: Case of master 2 students\",\"authors\":\"Mokhtaria Rahmani\",\"doi\":\"10.18844/gjflt.v11i3.5777\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Writing an appropriate research paper requires evidently the mastery of effective synthesis. This paper intends to highlight students’ hindrances in producing a sound synthesis, particularly weak critical reading and proposes equally outlets for a sturdy comprehension. The motivation is linked with the slenderness of studies addressing critical reading/effective synthesis binary. This will have pedagogical implications regarding the teaching of synthesis. The researchers used purposive sampling with master two didactic students (39 students). Self-assessment of the teaching strategy, corpus analysis, and an eight-item student questionnaire were used. The findings indicated that the major problems surrounding the internalisation of good synthesis were related to the different operations required for critical reading. The paper put into evidence the necessity of integrating the subject of academic writing into the syllabi of Master didactic students, the design of adequate critical reading tasks, and urged equally the necessity of more condensed practice, both in-class and off-class.\\n \\nKeywords: Critical reading, effective synthesis, paraphrasing, shortness of instruction, master 2 students.\",\"PeriodicalId\":381886,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Journal of Foreign Language Teaching\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Journal of Foreign Language Teaching\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18844/gjflt.v11i3.5777\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Journal of Foreign Language Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18844/gjflt.v11i3.5777","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

写一篇合适的研究论文显然需要掌握有效的综合。本文旨在强调学生在形成健全的综合能力方面的障碍,特别是薄弱的批判性阅读,并提出了同样坚固的理解途径。动机与解决批判性阅读/有效综合二元问题的研究的冗长性有关。这将对综合课程的教学产生影响。研究人员采用有目的的抽样方法,对2级教学硕士生(39名学生)进行调查。采用教学策略自评、语料库分析及八项学生问卷。研究结果表明,围绕良好综合内在化的主要问题与批判性阅读所需的不同操作有关。本文论证了将学术写作主题纳入硕士教学学生的教学大纲的必要性,设计足够的批判性阅读任务,并同样敦促课堂上和课外更浓缩的实践的必要性。关键词:批判性阅读;有效综合;释义;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Critical reading as an impediment for effective synthesis: Case of master 2 students
Writing an appropriate research paper requires evidently the mastery of effective synthesis. This paper intends to highlight students’ hindrances in producing a sound synthesis, particularly weak critical reading and proposes equally outlets for a sturdy comprehension. The motivation is linked with the slenderness of studies addressing critical reading/effective synthesis binary. This will have pedagogical implications regarding the teaching of synthesis. The researchers used purposive sampling with master two didactic students (39 students). Self-assessment of the teaching strategy, corpus analysis, and an eight-item student questionnaire were used. The findings indicated that the major problems surrounding the internalisation of good synthesis were related to the different operations required for critical reading. The paper put into evidence the necessity of integrating the subject of academic writing into the syllabi of Master didactic students, the design of adequate critical reading tasks, and urged equally the necessity of more condensed practice, both in-class and off-class.   Keywords: Critical reading, effective synthesis, paraphrasing, shortness of instruction, master 2 students.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信