{"title":"TCP代理和QoS度量:多源场景下的性能分析","authors":"Samayamantula Sree Varshini, L. Chaurasia","doi":"10.1109/INDCON.2010.5712714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the present heterogeneous wired networks, reliability priority consideration is important. Quality of Service (QoS) varies according to congestion in the network and it can be avoided by different TCP Agents using congestion control algorithms. Previously, researches had only analyzed TCP agents, we extend their work to practical simulation for the multisource scenario to compare performance evaluation of different TCP agents: Tahoe, Reno, New-Reno, Sack1 and Vegas, based on QoS parameters like throughput, average end-to-end delay and packet loss by varying number of sources and Advertised Window (AW). Multisource environment is important from real world point of view. The selection of TCP Agents is based on type of application. We simulated TCP agents using ftp traffic and by increasing number of sources. We observed that Vegas works best for accurate delivery of data. Reno and Sack1 are suitable for real time streaming.","PeriodicalId":109071,"journal":{"name":"2010 Annual IEEE India Conference (INDICON)","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TCP agents and QoS measurements: Performance analysis on multi-source scenario\",\"authors\":\"Samayamantula Sree Varshini, L. Chaurasia\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/INDCON.2010.5712714\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the present heterogeneous wired networks, reliability priority consideration is important. Quality of Service (QoS) varies according to congestion in the network and it can be avoided by different TCP Agents using congestion control algorithms. Previously, researches had only analyzed TCP agents, we extend their work to practical simulation for the multisource scenario to compare performance evaluation of different TCP agents: Tahoe, Reno, New-Reno, Sack1 and Vegas, based on QoS parameters like throughput, average end-to-end delay and packet loss by varying number of sources and Advertised Window (AW). Multisource environment is important from real world point of view. The selection of TCP Agents is based on type of application. We simulated TCP agents using ftp traffic and by increasing number of sources. We observed that Vegas works best for accurate delivery of data. Reno and Sack1 are suitable for real time streaming.\",\"PeriodicalId\":109071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2010 Annual IEEE India Conference (INDICON)\",\"volume\":\"77 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2010 Annual IEEE India Conference (INDICON)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/INDCON.2010.5712714\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 Annual IEEE India Conference (INDICON)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INDCON.2010.5712714","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
在当前异构有线网络中,可靠性优先考虑非常重要。QoS (Quality of Service,服务质量)根据网络的拥塞情况而变化,可以通过不同的TCP代理使用拥塞控制算法来避免。以前的研究只分析了TCP代理,我们将他们的工作扩展到多源场景的实际模拟,以比较不同TCP代理的性能评估:Tahoe, Reno, New-Reno, Sack1和Vegas,基于QoS参数,如吞吐量,平均端到端延迟和数据包丢失在不同数量的源和广告窗口(AW)。从现实世界的角度来看,多源环境非常重要。TCP代理的选择基于应用程序的类型。我们使用ftp流量并通过增加源的数量来模拟TCP代理。我们观察到,Vegas最适合准确地传递数据。Reno和Sack1适合实时流媒体。
TCP agents and QoS measurements: Performance analysis on multi-source scenario
In the present heterogeneous wired networks, reliability priority consideration is important. Quality of Service (QoS) varies according to congestion in the network and it can be avoided by different TCP Agents using congestion control algorithms. Previously, researches had only analyzed TCP agents, we extend their work to practical simulation for the multisource scenario to compare performance evaluation of different TCP agents: Tahoe, Reno, New-Reno, Sack1 and Vegas, based on QoS parameters like throughput, average end-to-end delay and packet loss by varying number of sources and Advertised Window (AW). Multisource environment is important from real world point of view. The selection of TCP Agents is based on type of application. We simulated TCP agents using ftp traffic and by increasing number of sources. We observed that Vegas works best for accurate delivery of data. Reno and Sack1 are suitable for real time streaming.