信用风险的机器学习:三个成功案例

Paolo Di Biasi, Rita Gnutti, Andrea Resti, D. Vergari
{"title":"信用风险的机器学习:三个成功案例","authors":"Paolo Di Biasi, Rita Gnutti, Andrea Resti, D. Vergari","doi":"10.47473/2020rmm0108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the financial services landscape witnesses an unprecedented change, banks can use machine learning (“ML”) to expand their databases through alternative sources providing unstructured and semi-structured information, such as transaction data and digital footprint data. However, ML algorithms also suffer from several potential shortcomings, as they may overfit sample data and prove unstable over time, they may quickly become obsolete and need re-estimation, and they may prove hard to interpret. This paper joins the debate on ML in banks by providing three case studies that highlight the benefits of machine learning, while showing how its drawbacks can be minimised: a rating model developed within the IRB framework, a challenger model used to validate a bank’s main model for retail PDs, and an early warning system based on transaction data.","PeriodicalId":296057,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management Magazine","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine Learning for Credit risk: three successful Case Histories\",\"authors\":\"Paolo Di Biasi, Rita Gnutti, Andrea Resti, D. Vergari\",\"doi\":\"10.47473/2020rmm0108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As the financial services landscape witnesses an unprecedented change, banks can use machine learning (“ML”) to expand their databases through alternative sources providing unstructured and semi-structured information, such as transaction data and digital footprint data. However, ML algorithms also suffer from several potential shortcomings, as they may overfit sample data and prove unstable over time, they may quickly become obsolete and need re-estimation, and they may prove hard to interpret. This paper joins the debate on ML in banks by providing three case studies that highlight the benefits of machine learning, while showing how its drawbacks can be minimised: a rating model developed within the IRB framework, a challenger model used to validate a bank’s main model for retail PDs, and an early warning system based on transaction data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":296057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Risk Management Magazine\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Risk Management Magazine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47473/2020rmm0108\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management Magazine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47473/2020rmm0108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着金融服务领域发生前所未有的变化,银行可以使用机器学习(“ML”)通过提供非结构化和半结构化信息的替代来源(如交易数据和数字足迹数据)来扩展其数据库。然而,机器学习算法也有一些潜在的缺点,因为它们可能会过拟合样本数据,并且随着时间的推移被证明是不稳定的,它们可能很快就会过时,需要重新估计,而且它们可能很难解释。本文通过提供三个案例研究加入了关于银行机器学习的辩论,这些案例研究突出了机器学习的好处,同时展示了如何最大限度地减少机器学习的缺点:在IRB框架内开发的评级模型,用于验证银行零售pd主要模型的挑战者模型,以及基于交易数据的早期预警系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Machine Learning for Credit risk: three successful Case Histories
As the financial services landscape witnesses an unprecedented change, banks can use machine learning (“ML”) to expand their databases through alternative sources providing unstructured and semi-structured information, such as transaction data and digital footprint data. However, ML algorithms also suffer from several potential shortcomings, as they may overfit sample data and prove unstable over time, they may quickly become obsolete and need re-estimation, and they may prove hard to interpret. This paper joins the debate on ML in banks by providing three case studies that highlight the benefits of machine learning, while showing how its drawbacks can be minimised: a rating model developed within the IRB framework, a challenger model used to validate a bank’s main model for retail PDs, and an early warning system based on transaction data.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信