探索游客参观佩特拉考古遗址时的体验:来自猫途鹰的声音

Victor Oluwafemi Olorunsola, M. Saydam, T. Lasisi, Ali Ozturen
{"title":"探索游客参观佩特拉考古遗址时的体验:来自猫途鹰的声音","authors":"Victor Oluwafemi Olorunsola, M. Saydam, T. Lasisi, Ali Ozturen","doi":"10.1108/cbth-05-2021-0118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nArchaeological heritage tourism has great potential for development in numerous destinations. However, literature on archaeological heritage tourism is scarce and empirical data are minimal. This paper aims to identify the main themes shared in online reviews by tourists, as well as identify factors known as satisfiers and dissatisfiers based on Herzberg’s two-factor theory among tourists who visited Petra UNESCO heritage site.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe research used content analyses to analyse 1,419 tourist’s online reviews on TripAdvisor. Leximancer software provided computer-assisted qualitative data analysis that pinpoint the dominant themes, after which further qualitative analysis found the main narratives associated with different satisfaction groups.\n\n\nFindings\nSuccessively, seven themes were revealed: entrance, trip, monastery, buildings, animal, carriage and safe. Furthermore, a four-dimensional model was postulated to help understand the components and flow of visitors’ experiences in an archaeological heritage site. In addition, the findings of the study revealed that tourists who scored their experience as 4 (very good) or 5 (excellent) (satisfiers) commonly shared perceptions about architecture, buildings, safe, temples, monasteries, tours, tombs and helpful. Contrarily, reviewers that rated their experience as 1 (terrible) or 2 (poor) (dissatisfiers) shared narratives around concepts such as expensive, animals, carriages, locals and shops.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe results offer valuable understandings of cultural heritage tourists’ overall experiences based on TripAdvisor reviews and facilitate the identification of the dominant themes associated with drivers of tourists’ satisfaction/dissatisfaction.\n","PeriodicalId":271272,"journal":{"name":"Consumer Behavior in Tourism and Hospitality","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring tourists’ experiences when visiting Petra archaeological heritage site: voices from TripAdvisor\",\"authors\":\"Victor Oluwafemi Olorunsola, M. Saydam, T. Lasisi, Ali Ozturen\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/cbth-05-2021-0118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nArchaeological heritage tourism has great potential for development in numerous destinations. However, literature on archaeological heritage tourism is scarce and empirical data are minimal. This paper aims to identify the main themes shared in online reviews by tourists, as well as identify factors known as satisfiers and dissatisfiers based on Herzberg’s two-factor theory among tourists who visited Petra UNESCO heritage site.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThe research used content analyses to analyse 1,419 tourist’s online reviews on TripAdvisor. Leximancer software provided computer-assisted qualitative data analysis that pinpoint the dominant themes, after which further qualitative analysis found the main narratives associated with different satisfaction groups.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nSuccessively, seven themes were revealed: entrance, trip, monastery, buildings, animal, carriage and safe. Furthermore, a four-dimensional model was postulated to help understand the components and flow of visitors’ experiences in an archaeological heritage site. In addition, the findings of the study revealed that tourists who scored their experience as 4 (very good) or 5 (excellent) (satisfiers) commonly shared perceptions about architecture, buildings, safe, temples, monasteries, tours, tombs and helpful. Contrarily, reviewers that rated their experience as 1 (terrible) or 2 (poor) (dissatisfiers) shared narratives around concepts such as expensive, animals, carriages, locals and shops.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThe results offer valuable understandings of cultural heritage tourists’ overall experiences based on TripAdvisor reviews and facilitate the identification of the dominant themes associated with drivers of tourists’ satisfaction/dissatisfaction.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":271272,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Consumer Behavior in Tourism and Hospitality\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Consumer Behavior in Tourism and Hospitality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/cbth-05-2021-0118\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Consumer Behavior in Tourism and Hospitality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/cbth-05-2021-0118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

目的地质遗产旅游在众多旅游目的地具有巨大的发展潜力。然而,关于考古遗产旅游的文献很少,经验数据也很少。本文旨在识别游客在线评论的共同主题,并根据赫茨伯格的双因素理论,在参观过佩特拉联合国教科文组织遗产地的游客中识别出满意因素和不满意因素。设计/方法/方法该研究使用内容分析分析了1419条游客在TripAdvisor上的在线评论。Leximancer软件提供了计算机辅助的定性数据分析,确定了主要主题,之后进一步的定性分析发现了与不同满意度群体相关的主要叙述。依次揭示了七个主题:入口、旅行、寺院、建筑、动物、马车和安全。此外,假设了一个四维模型来帮助理解考古遗址中游客体验的组成部分和流程。此外,研究结果显示,那些给自己的体验打了4分(非常好)或5分(非常好)(满意者)的游客通常对建筑、建筑、安全、寺庙、修道院、旅游、坟墓和乐于助人有同样的看法。相反,那些给自己的体验打分为1分(糟糕)或2分(差)(不满意)的评论者则围绕着昂贵、动物、马车、当地人和商店等概念分享了自己的经历。原创性/价值研究结果基于TripAdvisor的评论,对文化遗产游客的整体体验提供了有价值的理解,并有助于确定与游客满意/不满意因素相关的主要主题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring tourists’ experiences when visiting Petra archaeological heritage site: voices from TripAdvisor
Purpose Archaeological heritage tourism has great potential for development in numerous destinations. However, literature on archaeological heritage tourism is scarce and empirical data are minimal. This paper aims to identify the main themes shared in online reviews by tourists, as well as identify factors known as satisfiers and dissatisfiers based on Herzberg’s two-factor theory among tourists who visited Petra UNESCO heritage site. Design/methodology/approach The research used content analyses to analyse 1,419 tourist’s online reviews on TripAdvisor. Leximancer software provided computer-assisted qualitative data analysis that pinpoint the dominant themes, after which further qualitative analysis found the main narratives associated with different satisfaction groups. Findings Successively, seven themes were revealed: entrance, trip, monastery, buildings, animal, carriage and safe. Furthermore, a four-dimensional model was postulated to help understand the components and flow of visitors’ experiences in an archaeological heritage site. In addition, the findings of the study revealed that tourists who scored their experience as 4 (very good) or 5 (excellent) (satisfiers) commonly shared perceptions about architecture, buildings, safe, temples, monasteries, tours, tombs and helpful. Contrarily, reviewers that rated their experience as 1 (terrible) or 2 (poor) (dissatisfiers) shared narratives around concepts such as expensive, animals, carriages, locals and shops. Originality/value The results offer valuable understandings of cultural heritage tourists’ overall experiences based on TripAdvisor reviews and facilitate the identification of the dominant themes associated with drivers of tourists’ satisfaction/dissatisfaction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信