区块链、可替代性和实物资产:法律观点

Gavin P. Johnson
{"title":"区块链、可替代性和实物资产:法律观点","authors":"Gavin P. Johnson","doi":"10.47330/cbc.2021.plbh4631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"2021 has witnessed a surge of interest in non-fungible tokens or “NFTs”. However, there is considerable misunderstanding surrounding what an NFTs is, what it may or may not represent, how rights attach, how it may be enforced or used for enforcement of rights, and how it is connected to the asset it purportedly represents. This is self-evident in discussions between the technology community, implementers, and the legal profession. This is compounded by a lack of clarity in how current legal frameworks work with or are applied to such tokens.","PeriodicalId":178316,"journal":{"name":"Blockchain and the Digital Twin","volume":"115 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Blockchain, Fungibility, and Physical Assets: The Legal View\",\"authors\":\"Gavin P. Johnson\",\"doi\":\"10.47330/cbc.2021.plbh4631\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"2021 has witnessed a surge of interest in non-fungible tokens or “NFTs”. However, there is considerable misunderstanding surrounding what an NFTs is, what it may or may not represent, how rights attach, how it may be enforced or used for enforcement of rights, and how it is connected to the asset it purportedly represents. This is self-evident in discussions between the technology community, implementers, and the legal profession. This is compounded by a lack of clarity in how current legal frameworks work with or are applied to such tokens.\",\"PeriodicalId\":178316,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blockchain and the Digital Twin\",\"volume\":\"115 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blockchain and the Digital Twin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47330/cbc.2021.plbh4631\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blockchain and the Digital Twin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47330/cbc.2021.plbh4631","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2021年,人们对不可替代代币或“nft”的兴趣激增。然而,围绕nft是什么、它可能代表什么或不代表什么、权利如何附加、它如何执行或用于执行权利,以及它如何与据称代表的资产相关联,存在相当大的误解。在技术社区、实现者和法律专业人员之间的讨论中,这是不言而喻的。由于目前的法律框架如何使用或应用于此类代币缺乏明确性,这一点变得更加复杂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Blockchain, Fungibility, and Physical Assets: The Legal View
2021 has witnessed a surge of interest in non-fungible tokens or “NFTs”. However, there is considerable misunderstanding surrounding what an NFTs is, what it may or may not represent, how rights attach, how it may be enforced or used for enforcement of rights, and how it is connected to the asset it purportedly represents. This is self-evident in discussions between the technology community, implementers, and the legal profession. This is compounded by a lack of clarity in how current legal frameworks work with or are applied to such tokens.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信