Chitwan Rampur春玉米螟虫生态管理措施的田间防治效果

G. Bhandari, Resham Bahadur Thapa, Yagya Prasad Giri, Hira Kaji Manandhar, Pramod Kumar Jha
{"title":"Chitwan Rampur春玉米螟虫生态管理措施的田间防治效果","authors":"G. Bhandari, Resham Bahadur Thapa, Yagya Prasad Giri, Hira Kaji Manandhar, Pramod Kumar Jha","doi":"10.52547/azarinj.040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accepted: 17 Dec. 2020 A field experiment was conducted to determine the comparative efficacy of different eco-friendly management practices against maize stem borers, Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) and Sesamia inferens (Walker) in maize under field condition during spring season for two consecutive years, 2017 and 2018. The experiment was laid out in a randomized complete block design with four replications and seven treatments, namely: i) Trichogramma chilonis (Ishii) (egg parasitoids) @100000 eggs ha, ii) Nimbicidine 0.03% (Neemax)-commercial product of neem @ 3.0 mL L of water, iii) Spinosad 45% SC (Tracer) -bio-insecticide @ 0.5 mL L of water, iv) Bacillus thuringiensis10cfu mL (Mahashakti)-bio-insecticide @ 2 mL L of water, v) maize intercropping with cowpea (1:1 ratio), vi) Chlorpyrifos 20% EC (Dursban)chemical insecticide @ 2 mL L of water, and vii) Untreated control (without application) at the National Maize Research Program, Chitwan, Nepal. The efficacy study revealed that all the treatments significantly reduced leaf and stem injuries and increased grain yield over untreated check (p<0.05). The treatment, chlorpyrifos 20% EC was found effective with minimum percent infestation in both leaf (5.51%) and stem (1.86%) injury followed by spinosad 45% EC and T. chilonis respectively. Similarly, spinosad 45% EC gave significant result with the highest grain yield (4.66 mt ha) followed by Chlorpyrifos 20% EC (4.57 mt ha) and maize + cowpea intercropping (4.23 mt ha) as compared to untreated control (2.91 mt ha). Maize + cowpea (1:1) intercropping and release of T. chilonis were at par statistically and proved safer to natural enemies as compared to the chemical insecticides.","PeriodicalId":355533,"journal":{"name":"Azarian Journal of Agriculture","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Field efficacy of eco-friendly management practices against maize stem borers in spring maize at Rampur, Chitwan\",\"authors\":\"G. Bhandari, Resham Bahadur Thapa, Yagya Prasad Giri, Hira Kaji Manandhar, Pramod Kumar Jha\",\"doi\":\"10.52547/azarinj.040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Accepted: 17 Dec. 2020 A field experiment was conducted to determine the comparative efficacy of different eco-friendly management practices against maize stem borers, Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) and Sesamia inferens (Walker) in maize under field condition during spring season for two consecutive years, 2017 and 2018. The experiment was laid out in a randomized complete block design with four replications and seven treatments, namely: i) Trichogramma chilonis (Ishii) (egg parasitoids) @100000 eggs ha, ii) Nimbicidine 0.03% (Neemax)-commercial product of neem @ 3.0 mL L of water, iii) Spinosad 45% SC (Tracer) -bio-insecticide @ 0.5 mL L of water, iv) Bacillus thuringiensis10cfu mL (Mahashakti)-bio-insecticide @ 2 mL L of water, v) maize intercropping with cowpea (1:1 ratio), vi) Chlorpyrifos 20% EC (Dursban)chemical insecticide @ 2 mL L of water, and vii) Untreated control (without application) at the National Maize Research Program, Chitwan, Nepal. The efficacy study revealed that all the treatments significantly reduced leaf and stem injuries and increased grain yield over untreated check (p<0.05). The treatment, chlorpyrifos 20% EC was found effective with minimum percent infestation in both leaf (5.51%) and stem (1.86%) injury followed by spinosad 45% EC and T. chilonis respectively. Similarly, spinosad 45% EC gave significant result with the highest grain yield (4.66 mt ha) followed by Chlorpyrifos 20% EC (4.57 mt ha) and maize + cowpea intercropping (4.23 mt ha) as compared to untreated control (2.91 mt ha). Maize + cowpea (1:1) intercropping and release of T. chilonis were at par statistically and proved safer to natural enemies as compared to the chemical insecticides.\",\"PeriodicalId\":355533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Azarian Journal of Agriculture\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Azarian Journal of Agriculture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52547/azarinj.040\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Azarian Journal of Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52547/azarinj.040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本试验于2017年和2018年连续两年春季在田间条件下,对不同生态管理措施对玉米茎螟虫、斑螟和小蠹的防治效果进行了比较研究。试验采用随机完全区组设计,4个重复,7个处理,即:i)赤眼赤眼蜂(石井)(卵类寄生虫)@100000个卵公顷,ii)尼比西定0.03% (Neemax)-印印度树商业产品@ 3.0 mL L水,iii) Spinosad 45% SC(示踪剂)-生物杀虫剂@ 0.5 mL L水,iv)苏云金芽孢杆菌10cfu mL (Mahashakti)-生物杀虫剂@ 2 mL L水,v)玉米与豇豆间作(1:1比例),vi)毒死蜱20% EC (Dursban)化学杀虫剂@ 2 mL L水,以及尼泊尔奇旺国家玉米研究计划的未经处理控制(不施用)。功效研究表明,与未处理相比,各处理显著降低了叶片和茎的损伤,提高了籽粒产量(p<0.05)。毒死蜱20%的处理效果最好,叶片和茎部的侵染率分别为5.51%和1.86%,其次是45%的毒死蜱和黄粉虱。同样,与未经处理的对照(2.91万吨公顷)相比,施用45%乳酸菌素效果显著,籽粒产量最高(4.66万吨公顷),其次是毒死蜱20%乳酸菌(4.57万吨公顷)和玉米+豇豆间作(4.23万吨公顷)。与化学杀虫剂相比,玉米与豇豆(1:1)间作和螟蝇释放量在统计上是相等的,并且证明对天敌更安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Field efficacy of eco-friendly management practices against maize stem borers in spring maize at Rampur, Chitwan
Accepted: 17 Dec. 2020 A field experiment was conducted to determine the comparative efficacy of different eco-friendly management practices against maize stem borers, Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) and Sesamia inferens (Walker) in maize under field condition during spring season for two consecutive years, 2017 and 2018. The experiment was laid out in a randomized complete block design with four replications and seven treatments, namely: i) Trichogramma chilonis (Ishii) (egg parasitoids) @100000 eggs ha, ii) Nimbicidine 0.03% (Neemax)-commercial product of neem @ 3.0 mL L of water, iii) Spinosad 45% SC (Tracer) -bio-insecticide @ 0.5 mL L of water, iv) Bacillus thuringiensis10cfu mL (Mahashakti)-bio-insecticide @ 2 mL L of water, v) maize intercropping with cowpea (1:1 ratio), vi) Chlorpyrifos 20% EC (Dursban)chemical insecticide @ 2 mL L of water, and vii) Untreated control (without application) at the National Maize Research Program, Chitwan, Nepal. The efficacy study revealed that all the treatments significantly reduced leaf and stem injuries and increased grain yield over untreated check (p<0.05). The treatment, chlorpyrifos 20% EC was found effective with minimum percent infestation in both leaf (5.51%) and stem (1.86%) injury followed by spinosad 45% EC and T. chilonis respectively. Similarly, spinosad 45% EC gave significant result with the highest grain yield (4.66 mt ha) followed by Chlorpyrifos 20% EC (4.57 mt ha) and maize + cowpea intercropping (4.23 mt ha) as compared to untreated control (2.91 mt ha). Maize + cowpea (1:1) intercropping and release of T. chilonis were at par statistically and proved safer to natural enemies as compared to the chemical insecticides.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信