{"title":"芯片级故障建模中的微操作扰动","authors":"Chien-Hung Chao, F. G. Gray","doi":"10.1109/DAC.1988.14819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A determination is made of the best micro-operation perturbation for modeling faults at the chip level. The measure used is the gate level stuck-at-fault coverage achieved by the tests derived to cover the micro-operation perturbation faults. For small combination circuits, it is shown that perturbing the elements into the logic dual is a good choice. For large combinational circuits, it is shown that there is very little variation in the gate level coverage achieved by the various microoperation faults. In this case, if coverage is to be improved, the micro-operation perturbation method must be augmented by other techniques.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":230716,"journal":{"name":"25th ACM/IEEE, Design Automation Conference.Proceedings 1988.","volume":"174 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Micro-operation perturbations in chip level fault modeling\",\"authors\":\"Chien-Hung Chao, F. G. Gray\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/DAC.1988.14819\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A determination is made of the best micro-operation perturbation for modeling faults at the chip level. The measure used is the gate level stuck-at-fault coverage achieved by the tests derived to cover the micro-operation perturbation faults. For small combination circuits, it is shown that perturbing the elements into the logic dual is a good choice. For large combinational circuits, it is shown that there is very little variation in the gate level coverage achieved by the various microoperation faults. In this case, if coverage is to be improved, the micro-operation perturbation method must be augmented by other techniques.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":230716,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"25th ACM/IEEE, Design Automation Conference.Proceedings 1988.\",\"volume\":\"174 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1988-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"25th ACM/IEEE, Design Automation Conference.Proceedings 1988.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/DAC.1988.14819\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"25th ACM/IEEE, Design Automation Conference.Proceedings 1988.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DAC.1988.14819","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Micro-operation perturbations in chip level fault modeling
A determination is made of the best micro-operation perturbation for modeling faults at the chip level. The measure used is the gate level stuck-at-fault coverage achieved by the tests derived to cover the micro-operation perturbation faults. For small combination circuits, it is shown that perturbing the elements into the logic dual is a good choice. For large combinational circuits, it is shown that there is very little variation in the gate level coverage achieved by the various microoperation faults. In this case, if coverage is to be improved, the micro-operation perturbation method must be augmented by other techniques.<>