两种振动驱动运动系统在不同摩擦水平下的对比研究

Ngoc-Tuan La, Thanh-Toan Nguyen, V. Nguyen
{"title":"两种振动驱动运动系统在不同摩擦水平下的对比研究","authors":"Ngoc-Tuan La, Thanh-Toan Nguyen, V. Nguyen","doi":"10.15625/0866-7136/15662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presented comparison results of two locomotion models: a purevibration driven and a vibro-impact driven system. In experiments, the friction force can be varied without changing the internal and the body masses. The mathematical models of the two systems were developed and experimentally verified. Using dimensionless models, the results can be expanded to other sizes in practice. The two models were compared in the following aspects: the progression rate, the motion direction and the dynamics response. The effect of friction as an important variable on the dynamic response of the two scaled models were examined and compared by means of bifurcation analysis and basin of attraction. It has been found that, the pure-vibration can provide forward motion better than the vibro-impact does. The highest progression rate of the vibro-impact was less than that of the pure-vibration system in the investigated ranges of input parameters. Besides, the pure-vibration always has period-1 motion, whereas the vibro-impact system has a rich and complex dynamic response, including period-1, period-2 as well as chaotic motions. The results obtained would be useful for design and operating the self-propelled","PeriodicalId":239329,"journal":{"name":"Vietnam Journal of Mechanics","volume":"178 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study on the two vibration driven locomotion systems in various friction levels\",\"authors\":\"Ngoc-Tuan La, Thanh-Toan Nguyen, V. Nguyen\",\"doi\":\"10.15625/0866-7136/15662\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presented comparison results of two locomotion models: a purevibration driven and a vibro-impact driven system. In experiments, the friction force can be varied without changing the internal and the body masses. The mathematical models of the two systems were developed and experimentally verified. Using dimensionless models, the results can be expanded to other sizes in practice. The two models were compared in the following aspects: the progression rate, the motion direction and the dynamics response. The effect of friction as an important variable on the dynamic response of the two scaled models were examined and compared by means of bifurcation analysis and basin of attraction. It has been found that, the pure-vibration can provide forward motion better than the vibro-impact does. The highest progression rate of the vibro-impact was less than that of the pure-vibration system in the investigated ranges of input parameters. Besides, the pure-vibration always has period-1 motion, whereas the vibro-impact system has a rich and complex dynamic response, including period-1, period-2 as well as chaotic motions. The results obtained would be useful for design and operating the self-propelled\",\"PeriodicalId\":239329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vietnam Journal of Mechanics\",\"volume\":\"178 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vietnam Journal of Mechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15625/0866-7136/15662\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vietnam Journal of Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15625/0866-7136/15662","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文给出了纯振动驱动和振动冲击驱动两种运动模型的比较结果。在实验中,摩擦力可以在不改变内部质量和物体质量的情况下发生变化。建立了两种系统的数学模型并进行了实验验证。使用无量纲模型,结果可以在实践中扩展到其他尺寸。比较了两种模型的运动速度、运动方向和动力学响应。通过分岔分析和引力盆地分析,比较了摩擦力作为一个重要变量对两种模型动力响应的影响。研究发现,纯振动比振动冲击能更好地提供前向运动。在所研究的输入参数范围内,振动冲击的最高递进率小于纯振动系统。此外,纯振动总是具有周期1运动,而振动冲击系统具有丰富而复杂的动力响应,包括周期1、周期2以及混沌运动。所得结果对设计和操作自行火炮具有一定的参考价值
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparative study on the two vibration driven locomotion systems in various friction levels
This paper presented comparison results of two locomotion models: a purevibration driven and a vibro-impact driven system. In experiments, the friction force can be varied without changing the internal and the body masses. The mathematical models of the two systems were developed and experimentally verified. Using dimensionless models, the results can be expanded to other sizes in practice. The two models were compared in the following aspects: the progression rate, the motion direction and the dynamics response. The effect of friction as an important variable on the dynamic response of the two scaled models were examined and compared by means of bifurcation analysis and basin of attraction. It has been found that, the pure-vibration can provide forward motion better than the vibro-impact does. The highest progression rate of the vibro-impact was less than that of the pure-vibration system in the investigated ranges of input parameters. Besides, the pure-vibration always has period-1 motion, whereas the vibro-impact system has a rich and complex dynamic response, including period-1, period-2 as well as chaotic motions. The results obtained would be useful for design and operating the self-propelled
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信