从学者苏纳和什叶派的角度来看,圣训的动力学

Alkadri Alkadri
{"title":"从学者苏纳和什叶派的角度来看,圣训的动力学","authors":"Alkadri Alkadri","doi":"10.37567/borneo.v3i1.1559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses the dynamics of hadith scholarship between Sunnaists and Shia Imamiyah, developing along with criticism and scholarly dialogue on hadith between these two groups so that it is necessary to conduct studies with a focus on the history of scientific formation, characteristics, advantages and disadvantages of each. The discussion method is in the form of literature review. Data analysis uses content analysis with a historical approach. Primary data is in the form of hadith science books and secondary data from hadith books and others according to the needs of the discussion. The findings of the discussion: Scholars of hadith Expert Sunnah was born from oral culture into writings that are collected in the books of hadith. It is inclusive, oriented towards rawi and matan criticism with the levels of valid, hasan, dha'if and maudhu' so that scientific dialogue is well systemized even though the determination of the authenticity of hadith cannot be separated from the subjectivity of hadith critics. Imamiyya Shia hadith scholarship is under the authority of the imam and is exclusive with the levels of sahih, hasan, muwastaq and dha'if so that scientific dialogue is based on the authority of the imam and the scientific system adopts sunnah experts.","PeriodicalId":432116,"journal":{"name":"Borneo : Journal of Islamic Studies","volume":"51 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DINAMIKA KEILMUAN HADIS DALAM PERSPEKTIF AHLI SUNAH DAN SYIAH IMAMIYAH\",\"authors\":\"Alkadri Alkadri\",\"doi\":\"10.37567/borneo.v3i1.1559\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper discusses the dynamics of hadith scholarship between Sunnaists and Shia Imamiyah, developing along with criticism and scholarly dialogue on hadith between these two groups so that it is necessary to conduct studies with a focus on the history of scientific formation, characteristics, advantages and disadvantages of each. The discussion method is in the form of literature review. Data analysis uses content analysis with a historical approach. Primary data is in the form of hadith science books and secondary data from hadith books and others according to the needs of the discussion. The findings of the discussion: Scholars of hadith Expert Sunnah was born from oral culture into writings that are collected in the books of hadith. It is inclusive, oriented towards rawi and matan criticism with the levels of valid, hasan, dha'if and maudhu' so that scientific dialogue is well systemized even though the determination of the authenticity of hadith cannot be separated from the subjectivity of hadith critics. Imamiyya Shia hadith scholarship is under the authority of the imam and is exclusive with the levels of sahih, hasan, muwastaq and dha'if so that scientific dialogue is based on the authority of the imam and the scientific system adopts sunnah experts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":432116,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Borneo : Journal of Islamic Studies\",\"volume\":\"51 2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Borneo : Journal of Islamic Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37567/borneo.v3i1.1559\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Borneo : Journal of Islamic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37567/borneo.v3i1.1559","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论了逊尼派和什叶派伊玛目之间圣训学术的动态,随着这两个群体之间对圣训的批评和学术对话的发展,有必要将研究重点放在科学形成的历史、特点、优缺点上。讨论方法采用文献综述的形式。数据分析使用带有历史方法的内容分析。主要资料是圣训科学书籍的形式,次要资料是根据讨论的需要从圣训书籍和其他资料中获得的。讨论的结果:圣训学者专家圣训是从口头文化中诞生的,并被收集在圣训书中。它是包容的,面向rawi和matan的批评,有有效的层次,hasan, dha'if和maudhu',这样科学对话就很好地系统化了,即使对圣训真实性的确定不能与圣训评论家的主观性分开。伊玛目什叶派圣训学术在伊玛目的权威之下,与萨希、哈桑、穆瓦塔克和哈伊夫的层次是排他的,因此科学对话是以伊玛目的权威为基础的,科学体系采用圣训专家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
DINAMIKA KEILMUAN HADIS DALAM PERSPEKTIF AHLI SUNAH DAN SYIAH IMAMIYAH
This paper discusses the dynamics of hadith scholarship between Sunnaists and Shia Imamiyah, developing along with criticism and scholarly dialogue on hadith between these two groups so that it is necessary to conduct studies with a focus on the history of scientific formation, characteristics, advantages and disadvantages of each. The discussion method is in the form of literature review. Data analysis uses content analysis with a historical approach. Primary data is in the form of hadith science books and secondary data from hadith books and others according to the needs of the discussion. The findings of the discussion: Scholars of hadith Expert Sunnah was born from oral culture into writings that are collected in the books of hadith. It is inclusive, oriented towards rawi and matan criticism with the levels of valid, hasan, dha'if and maudhu' so that scientific dialogue is well systemized even though the determination of the authenticity of hadith cannot be separated from the subjectivity of hadith critics. Imamiyya Shia hadith scholarship is under the authority of the imam and is exclusive with the levels of sahih, hasan, muwastaq and dha'if so that scientific dialogue is based on the authority of the imam and the scientific system adopts sunnah experts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信