伯拉纠教学的讽刺及其与伯拉纠文本现实的脱节

A. Bonner
{"title":"伯拉纠教学的讽刺及其与伯拉纠文本现实的脱节","authors":"A. Bonner","doi":"10.5871/BACAD/9780197266397.003.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter is a review of the teachings attributed to Pelagius, examining each tenet in Augustine of Hippo’s list of 14 to see whether or not Pelagius taught it. It offers a discussion of the range of meanings of the word grace (gratia) in contemporary literature and an analysis of his opponents’ characterisation of Pelagius’ writings as arrogant and deceitful, and of the purpose of the 14 tenets. It also discusses Augustine’s statements that he did not care whether or not Pelagius taught the ideas he attributed to him.","PeriodicalId":344041,"journal":{"name":"The Myth of Pelagianism","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Caricature of Pelagius’ Teaching and its Disjunction from the Reality of Texts Written by Pelagius\",\"authors\":\"A. Bonner\",\"doi\":\"10.5871/BACAD/9780197266397.003.0001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter is a review of the teachings attributed to Pelagius, examining each tenet in Augustine of Hippo’s list of 14 to see whether or not Pelagius taught it. It offers a discussion of the range of meanings of the word grace (gratia) in contemporary literature and an analysis of his opponents’ characterisation of Pelagius’ writings as arrogant and deceitful, and of the purpose of the 14 tenets. It also discusses Augustine’s statements that he did not care whether or not Pelagius taught the ideas he attributed to him.\",\"PeriodicalId\":344041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Myth of Pelagianism\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Myth of Pelagianism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5871/BACAD/9780197266397.003.0001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Myth of Pelagianism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5871/BACAD/9780197266397.003.0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这一章是对伯拉纠的教义的回顾,检查奥古斯丁的14条教义清单中的每一条教义,看看是否伯拉纠教过它。本书讨论了“恩典”(gratia)一词在当代文学中的含义范围,并分析了他的反对者将伯拉纠的作品定性为傲慢和欺骗,以及14条信条的目的。它还讨论了奥古斯丁的声明,他不在乎伯拉纠是否教授他认为是他的思想。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Caricature of Pelagius’ Teaching and its Disjunction from the Reality of Texts Written by Pelagius
This chapter is a review of the teachings attributed to Pelagius, examining each tenet in Augustine of Hippo’s list of 14 to see whether or not Pelagius taught it. It offers a discussion of the range of meanings of the word grace (gratia) in contemporary literature and an analysis of his opponents’ characterisation of Pelagius’ writings as arrogant and deceitful, and of the purpose of the 14 tenets. It also discusses Augustine’s statements that he did not care whether or not Pelagius taught the ideas he attributed to him.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信