识别和解决软件架构中的最小权限冲突

Koen Buyens, Bart De Win, W. Joosen
{"title":"识别和解决软件架构中的最小权限冲突","authors":"Koen Buyens, Bart De Win, W. Joosen","doi":"10.1109/ARES.2009.48","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Security principles, like least privilege, are among the resources in the security body of knowledge that survived the test of time. The implementation of these principles in a software architecture is difficult, as there are no systematic rules on how to apply them in practice. As a result, they are often neglected, which lowers the overall security level of the software system and increases the cost necessary to fix this later in the development life-cycle.This paper improves the support for least privilege in software architectures by (i) defining the foundations to identify potential violations of the principle herein and (ii) elicitating architectural transformations that positively impact the security properties of the architecture, while preserving the semantics thereof. These results have been implemented and validated in a number of case studies.","PeriodicalId":169468,"journal":{"name":"2009 International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying and Resolving Least Privilege Violations in Software Architectures\",\"authors\":\"Koen Buyens, Bart De Win, W. Joosen\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ARES.2009.48\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Security principles, like least privilege, are among the resources in the security body of knowledge that survived the test of time. The implementation of these principles in a software architecture is difficult, as there are no systematic rules on how to apply them in practice. As a result, they are often neglected, which lowers the overall security level of the software system and increases the cost necessary to fix this later in the development life-cycle.This paper improves the support for least privilege in software architectures by (i) defining the foundations to identify potential violations of the principle herein and (ii) elicitating architectural transformations that positively impact the security properties of the architecture, while preserving the semantics thereof. These results have been implemented and validated in a number of case studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":169468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2009 International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-03-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2009 International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ARES.2009.48\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ARES.2009.48","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

安全原则和最小特权一样,是安全知识体系中经得起时间考验的资源之一。在软件架构中实现这些原则是困难的,因为没有关于如何在实践中应用它们的系统规则。因此,它们经常被忽略,这降低了软件系统的整体安全级别,并增加了在开发生命周期后期修复此问题所需的成本。本文通过以下方式改进了对软件架构中最小特权的支持:(i)定义了识别潜在违反原则的基础;(ii)引出了对架构的安全属性产生积极影响的架构转换,同时保留了其语义。这些结果已在若干案例研究中得到实施和验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Identifying and Resolving Least Privilege Violations in Software Architectures
Security principles, like least privilege, are among the resources in the security body of knowledge that survived the test of time. The implementation of these principles in a software architecture is difficult, as there are no systematic rules on how to apply them in practice. As a result, they are often neglected, which lowers the overall security level of the software system and increases the cost necessary to fix this later in the development life-cycle.This paper improves the support for least privilege in software architectures by (i) defining the foundations to identify potential violations of the principle herein and (ii) elicitating architectural transformations that positively impact the security properties of the architecture, while preserving the semantics thereof. These results have been implemented and validated in a number of case studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信