{"title":"作为马克斯·韦伯独立思维结构的理想类型","authors":"Firuzsho K. Nazarshoev","doi":"10.18572/1812-3805-2023-6-9-15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article considers the ‘ideal type’ as a separate mental construct that was used by various sociologists in order to structure the empirical reality to which their scientific interest was directed. The phrase ‘ideal type’ is a mysterious phenomenon of Weber’s methodology. You can talk about it only by using ‘quotation marks’. This word is clearly not up to the status of a scientific term, since Weber did not offer any definitive definition of the ‘ideal type’. He offered only some descriptions or examples of how an ‘ideal type’ might ‘work’ in a particular case.","PeriodicalId":302886,"journal":{"name":"History of state and law","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Ideal Type as a Max Weber’s Separate Thinking Structure\",\"authors\":\"Firuzsho K. Nazarshoev\",\"doi\":\"10.18572/1812-3805-2023-6-9-15\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article considers the ‘ideal type’ as a separate mental construct that was used by various sociologists in order to structure the empirical reality to which their scientific interest was directed. The phrase ‘ideal type’ is a mysterious phenomenon of Weber’s methodology. You can talk about it only by using ‘quotation marks’. This word is clearly not up to the status of a scientific term, since Weber did not offer any definitive definition of the ‘ideal type’. He offered only some descriptions or examples of how an ‘ideal type’ might ‘work’ in a particular case.\",\"PeriodicalId\":302886,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"History of state and law\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"History of state and law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-3805-2023-6-9-15\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of state and law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-3805-2023-6-9-15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Ideal Type as a Max Weber’s Separate Thinking Structure
The article considers the ‘ideal type’ as a separate mental construct that was used by various sociologists in order to structure the empirical reality to which their scientific interest was directed. The phrase ‘ideal type’ is a mysterious phenomenon of Weber’s methodology. You can talk about it only by using ‘quotation marks’. This word is clearly not up to the status of a scientific term, since Weber did not offer any definitive definition of the ‘ideal type’. He offered only some descriptions or examples of how an ‘ideal type’ might ‘work’ in a particular case.