运用德尔菲法辨识综合教育影响之变数

Yoon, Heojeong, Jiyoung Kim, Bang dami
{"title":"运用德尔菲法辨识综合教育影响之变数","authors":"Yoon, Heojeong, Jiyoung Kim, Bang dami","doi":"10.14697/JKASE.2016.36.6.0959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, the Delphi Method was conducted to extract variables as effects of integrated education. Forty-six experts engaged in both the integrated education and research fields participated in this study. The Delphi survey was conducted for three rounds. In the first round, an open questionnaire was given asking variables possibly considered as effects of integrated education. In the second round, variables induced from analysis of the first survey results were given and the degree of agreement for each variable was determined according to the Likert scale. In the third round of the survey, mean, standard deviation, and the first and third quartile calculated using the results of the second survey were given to experts to determine their degree of assent. In addition, categories for variables were suggested. The degree of agreement for appropriateness of categorization and relative importance were determined As a result, a total of 18 variables were chosen except for career awareness. They were categorized according to their definition and properties into five categories: ‘creativity’ (flexible thinking, associative thinking, intuitive thinking, creative thinking), ‘problem solving’ (meta-cognition, problem recognition and solving, critical thinking, decision making ability, ability of knowledge application, knowledge and information processing skills), ‘integrative perception and sensitivity’ (concern and interest in various disciplines, understanding and acceptance of difference, integrative thinking), ‘interpersonal relations’ (communication skills, cooperation), and ‘disciplinary literacy’ (humanistic imagination, basic knowledge and literacy of each discipline, academic motivation). The degree of agreement was high in variables included in ‘creativity’ and ‘problem solving’categories and the frequency of choosing the importance was high in variables included in ‘integrative perception and sensitivity’. The educational implication related to implementation and practice of integrated education were discussed on the basis of results.","PeriodicalId":107400,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identification of Variables as the Effects of Integrated Education Using the Delphi Method\",\"authors\":\"Yoon, Heojeong, Jiyoung Kim, Bang dami\",\"doi\":\"10.14697/JKASE.2016.36.6.0959\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this study, the Delphi Method was conducted to extract variables as effects of integrated education. Forty-six experts engaged in both the integrated education and research fields participated in this study. The Delphi survey was conducted for three rounds. In the first round, an open questionnaire was given asking variables possibly considered as effects of integrated education. In the second round, variables induced from analysis of the first survey results were given and the degree of agreement for each variable was determined according to the Likert scale. In the third round of the survey, mean, standard deviation, and the first and third quartile calculated using the results of the second survey were given to experts to determine their degree of assent. In addition, categories for variables were suggested. The degree of agreement for appropriateness of categorization and relative importance were determined As a result, a total of 18 variables were chosen except for career awareness. They were categorized according to their definition and properties into five categories: ‘creativity’ (flexible thinking, associative thinking, intuitive thinking, creative thinking), ‘problem solving’ (meta-cognition, problem recognition and solving, critical thinking, decision making ability, ability of knowledge application, knowledge and information processing skills), ‘integrative perception and sensitivity’ (concern and interest in various disciplines, understanding and acceptance of difference, integrative thinking), ‘interpersonal relations’ (communication skills, cooperation), and ‘disciplinary literacy’ (humanistic imagination, basic knowledge and literacy of each discipline, academic motivation). The degree of agreement was high in variables included in ‘creativity’ and ‘problem solving’categories and the frequency of choosing the importance was high in variables included in ‘integrative perception and sensitivity’. The educational implication related to implementation and practice of integrated education were discussed on the basis of results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":107400,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2016.36.6.0959\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2016.36.6.0959","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究采用德尔菲法提取融合教育影响变量。46名从事综合教育和研究领域的专家参与了本研究。德尔菲调查共进行了三轮。在第一轮,一个开放的问卷,询问变量可能被认为是综合教育的影响。在第二轮中,给出由第一次调查结果分析得出的变量,并根据李克特量表确定每个变量的一致程度。在第三轮调查中,使用第二轮调查的结果计算出的平均值、标准差以及第一和第三个四分位数被交给专家,以确定他们的同意程度。此外,还提出了变量的分类。确定了分类的适当性和相对重要性的一致程度。结果,除职业意识外,共选择了18个变量。根据它们的定义和性质将它们分为五类:“创造力”(灵活思维、联想思维、直觉思维、创造性思维)、“解决问题”(元认知、问题识别和解决、批判性思维、决策能力、知识应用能力、知识和信息处理技能)、“综合感知和敏感性”(对不同学科的关注和兴趣、对差异的理解和接受、综合思维)、“人际关系”(沟通技巧、合作)和“学科素养”(人文想象力,各学科的基本知识和素养,学术动机)。在“创造力”和“解决问题”类别的变量中,一致性程度很高,在“综合感知和敏感性”类别的变量中,选择重要性的频率很高。在研究结果的基础上,探讨了融合教育实施与实践的教育意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Identification of Variables as the Effects of Integrated Education Using the Delphi Method
In this study, the Delphi Method was conducted to extract variables as effects of integrated education. Forty-six experts engaged in both the integrated education and research fields participated in this study. The Delphi survey was conducted for three rounds. In the first round, an open questionnaire was given asking variables possibly considered as effects of integrated education. In the second round, variables induced from analysis of the first survey results were given and the degree of agreement for each variable was determined according to the Likert scale. In the third round of the survey, mean, standard deviation, and the first and third quartile calculated using the results of the second survey were given to experts to determine their degree of assent. In addition, categories for variables were suggested. The degree of agreement for appropriateness of categorization and relative importance were determined As a result, a total of 18 variables were chosen except for career awareness. They were categorized according to their definition and properties into five categories: ‘creativity’ (flexible thinking, associative thinking, intuitive thinking, creative thinking), ‘problem solving’ (meta-cognition, problem recognition and solving, critical thinking, decision making ability, ability of knowledge application, knowledge and information processing skills), ‘integrative perception and sensitivity’ (concern and interest in various disciplines, understanding and acceptance of difference, integrative thinking), ‘interpersonal relations’ (communication skills, cooperation), and ‘disciplinary literacy’ (humanistic imagination, basic knowledge and literacy of each discipline, academic motivation). The degree of agreement was high in variables included in ‘creativity’ and ‘problem solving’categories and the frequency of choosing the importance was high in variables included in ‘integrative perception and sensitivity’. The educational implication related to implementation and practice of integrated education were discussed on the basis of results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信