{"title":"抽样不相交集的下界","authors":"Thomas Watson","doi":"10.1145/3404858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Suppose Alice and Bob each start with private randomness and no other input, and they wish to engage in a protocol in which Alice ends up with a set x⊆ [n] and Bob ends up with a set y⊆ [n], such that (x,y) is uniformly distributed over all pairs of disjoint sets. We prove that for some constant β < 1, this requires Ω (n) communication even to get within statistical distance 1− βn of the target distribution. Previously, Ambainis, Schulman, Ta-Shma, Vazirani, and Wigderson (FOCS 1998) proved that Ω (√n) communication is required to get within some constant statistical distance ɛ > 0 of the uniform distribution over all pairs of disjoint sets of size √n.","PeriodicalId":198744,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Computation Theory (TOCT)","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Lower Bound for Sampling Disjoint Sets\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Watson\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3404858\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Suppose Alice and Bob each start with private randomness and no other input, and they wish to engage in a protocol in which Alice ends up with a set x⊆ [n] and Bob ends up with a set y⊆ [n], such that (x,y) is uniformly distributed over all pairs of disjoint sets. We prove that for some constant β < 1, this requires Ω (n) communication even to get within statistical distance 1− βn of the target distribution. Previously, Ambainis, Schulman, Ta-Shma, Vazirani, and Wigderson (FOCS 1998) proved that Ω (√n) communication is required to get within some constant statistical distance ɛ > 0 of the uniform distribution over all pairs of disjoint sets of size √n.\",\"PeriodicalId\":198744,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Transactions on Computation Theory (TOCT)\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Transactions on Computation Theory (TOCT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3404858\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Computation Theory (TOCT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3404858","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Suppose Alice and Bob each start with private randomness and no other input, and they wish to engage in a protocol in which Alice ends up with a set x⊆ [n] and Bob ends up with a set y⊆ [n], such that (x,y) is uniformly distributed over all pairs of disjoint sets. We prove that for some constant β < 1, this requires Ω (n) communication even to get within statistical distance 1− βn of the target distribution. Previously, Ambainis, Schulman, Ta-Shma, Vazirani, and Wigderson (FOCS 1998) proved that Ω (√n) communication is required to get within some constant statistical distance ɛ > 0 of the uniform distribution over all pairs of disjoint sets of size √n.