有界度图中的分布最大匹配

G. Even, Moti Medina, D. Ron
{"title":"有界度图中的分布最大匹配","authors":"G. Even, Moti Medina, D. Ron","doi":"10.1145/2684464.2684469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present deterministic distributed algorithms for computing approximate maximum cardinality matchings and approximate maximum weight matchings. Our algorithm for the unweighted case computes a matching whose size is at least (1−ε) times the optimal in Δ O(1/ε) + O(1/ε2) · log* (n) rounds where n is the number of vertices in the graph and Δ is the maximum degree. Our algorithm for the edge-weighted case computes a matching whose weight is at least (1 − ε) times the optimal in log(min{1/ωmin, n/ε})O(1/ε). (Δ O(1/ε) + log*(n)) rounds for edge-weights in [wmin, 1]. The best previous algorithms for both the unweighted case and the weighted case are by Lotker, Patt-Shamir, and Pettie (SPAA 2008). For the unweighted case they give a randomized (1 − ε)-approximation algorithm that runs in O((log(n))ε3) rounds. For the weighted case they give a randomized (1/2 − ε)-approximation algorithm that runs in O(log(ε−1) · log(n)) rounds. Hence, our results improve on the previous ones when the parameters Δ, ε and wmin are constants (where we reduce the number of runs from O(log(n)) to O(log*(n))), and more generally when Δ, 1/ε and 1/wmin are sufficiently slowly increasing functions of n. Moreover, our algorithms are deterministic rather than randomized.","PeriodicalId":298587,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Distributed Computing and Networking","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"33","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distributed Maximum Matching in Bounded Degree Graphs\",\"authors\":\"G. Even, Moti Medina, D. Ron\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2684464.2684469\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We present deterministic distributed algorithms for computing approximate maximum cardinality matchings and approximate maximum weight matchings. Our algorithm for the unweighted case computes a matching whose size is at least (1−ε) times the optimal in Δ O(1/ε) + O(1/ε2) · log* (n) rounds where n is the number of vertices in the graph and Δ is the maximum degree. Our algorithm for the edge-weighted case computes a matching whose weight is at least (1 − ε) times the optimal in log(min{1/ωmin, n/ε})O(1/ε). (Δ O(1/ε) + log*(n)) rounds for edge-weights in [wmin, 1]. The best previous algorithms for both the unweighted case and the weighted case are by Lotker, Patt-Shamir, and Pettie (SPAA 2008). For the unweighted case they give a randomized (1 − ε)-approximation algorithm that runs in O((log(n))ε3) rounds. For the weighted case they give a randomized (1/2 − ε)-approximation algorithm that runs in O(log(ε−1) · log(n)) rounds. Hence, our results improve on the previous ones when the parameters Δ, ε and wmin are constants (where we reduce the number of runs from O(log(n)) to O(log*(n))), and more generally when Δ, 1/ε and 1/wmin are sufficiently slowly increasing functions of n. Moreover, our algorithms are deterministic rather than randomized.\",\"PeriodicalId\":298587,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Distributed Computing and Networking\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"33\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Distributed Computing and Networking\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2684464.2684469\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Distributed Computing and Networking","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2684464.2684469","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

摘要

我们提出了计算近似最大基数匹配和近似最大权重匹配的确定性分布式算法。对于未加权情况,我们的算法计算一个匹配,其大小至少是(1−ε)倍于Δ O(1/ε) + O(1/ε2)·log* (n)个轮中的最优匹配,其中n是图中的顶点数,Δ是最大度。对于边加权情况,我们的算法计算一个匹配,其权重至少是(1−ε)倍于log(min{1/ωmin, n/ε})O(1/ε)的最优值。(Δ 0 (1/ε) + log*(n)))轮对[wmin, 1]中的边权。对于未加权情况和加权情况,以前最好的算法是由Lotker, pat - shamir和Pettie (SPAA 2008)提出的。对于未加权的情况,他们给出了一个随机的(1−ε)近似算法,该算法运行O((log(n))ε3)轮。对于加权情况,他们给出了一个随机的(1/2−ε)近似算法,该算法运行O(log(ε−1)·log(n))轮。因此,当参数Δ, ε和wmin是常数时(我们将运行次数从O(log(n))减少到O(log*(n)),以及更一般地当Δ, 1/ε和1/wmin是足够缓慢增加n的函数时),我们的结果比之前的结果有所改进。此外,我们的算法是确定性的,而不是随机的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Distributed Maximum Matching in Bounded Degree Graphs
We present deterministic distributed algorithms for computing approximate maximum cardinality matchings and approximate maximum weight matchings. Our algorithm for the unweighted case computes a matching whose size is at least (1−ε) times the optimal in Δ O(1/ε) + O(1/ε2) · log* (n) rounds where n is the number of vertices in the graph and Δ is the maximum degree. Our algorithm for the edge-weighted case computes a matching whose weight is at least (1 − ε) times the optimal in log(min{1/ωmin, n/ε})O(1/ε). (Δ O(1/ε) + log*(n)) rounds for edge-weights in [wmin, 1]. The best previous algorithms for both the unweighted case and the weighted case are by Lotker, Patt-Shamir, and Pettie (SPAA 2008). For the unweighted case they give a randomized (1 − ε)-approximation algorithm that runs in O((log(n))ε3) rounds. For the weighted case they give a randomized (1/2 − ε)-approximation algorithm that runs in O(log(ε−1) · log(n)) rounds. Hence, our results improve on the previous ones when the parameters Δ, ε and wmin are constants (where we reduce the number of runs from O(log(n)) to O(log*(n))), and more generally when Δ, 1/ε and 1/wmin are sufficiently slowly increasing functions of n. Moreover, our algorithms are deterministic rather than randomized.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信