建筑环境和儿童早期发展:来自澳大利亚弱势社区的定性证据

Karen Villanueva, G. Woolcock, S. Goldfeld, R. Tanton, S. Brinkman, I. Katz, B. Giles-Corti
{"title":"建筑环境和儿童早期发展:来自澳大利亚弱势社区的定性证据","authors":"Karen Villanueva, G. Woolcock, S. Goldfeld, R. Tanton, S. Brinkman, I. Katz, B. Giles-Corti","doi":"10.1080/14733285.2022.2059651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper explores neighborhood-built environment features related to ‘better than expected’ and ‘as expected’ early childhood development outcomes (ECD) in 14 Australian disadvantaged communities. This paper draws from mixed methods data collected in the Kids in Communities Study – an Australian investigation of community effects on ECD – in communities across five states and territories. In total, 93 interviews and 30 focus groups were conducted with service providers and parents, and geographic information systems were used to create built environment measures for each local community. Housing factors (e.g. better affordability, tenure, less high-density public housing) were consistently related to disadvantaged local communities with ‘better than expected’ ECD outcomes. Physical access to services and public transport, living in a walkable area, having high-quality public open space, and a mix of local destinations was perceived to be consistently important by community members in disadvantaged communities regardless of ECD outcomes. Findings may help policymakers to consider neighborhood features that contribute to better ECD outcomes.","PeriodicalId":375438,"journal":{"name":"Children's Geographies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The built environment and early childhood development: qualitative evidence from disadvantaged Australian communities\",\"authors\":\"Karen Villanueva, G. Woolcock, S. Goldfeld, R. Tanton, S. Brinkman, I. Katz, B. Giles-Corti\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14733285.2022.2059651\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This paper explores neighborhood-built environment features related to ‘better than expected’ and ‘as expected’ early childhood development outcomes (ECD) in 14 Australian disadvantaged communities. This paper draws from mixed methods data collected in the Kids in Communities Study – an Australian investigation of community effects on ECD – in communities across five states and territories. In total, 93 interviews and 30 focus groups were conducted with service providers and parents, and geographic information systems were used to create built environment measures for each local community. Housing factors (e.g. better affordability, tenure, less high-density public housing) were consistently related to disadvantaged local communities with ‘better than expected’ ECD outcomes. Physical access to services and public transport, living in a walkable area, having high-quality public open space, and a mix of local destinations was perceived to be consistently important by community members in disadvantaged communities regardless of ECD outcomes. Findings may help policymakers to consider neighborhood features that contribute to better ECD outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":375438,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Children's Geographies\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Children's Geographies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2022.2059651\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Children's Geographies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2022.2059651","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

摘要:本文探讨了澳大利亚14个弱势社区中与“好于预期”和“如预期”的早期儿童发展结果(ECD)相关的社区建设环境特征。这篇论文借鉴了在澳大利亚五个州和地区的社区进行的“社区儿童研究”(一项关于社区对幼儿发展影响的调查)中收集的混合方法数据。总共与服务提供者和家长进行了93次访谈和30个焦点小组,并使用地理信息系统为每个当地社区制定了建筑环境措施。住房因素(例如,更好的负担能力、租住权、更低密度的公共住房)始终与处于不利地位的当地社区有关,其ECD结果“好于预期”。无论ECD结果如何,弱势社区的社区成员始终认为,获得服务和公共交通、居住在可步行区域、拥有高质量的公共开放空间以及当地目的地的组合都很重要。研究结果可能有助于决策者考虑有助于改善ECD结果的社区特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The built environment and early childhood development: qualitative evidence from disadvantaged Australian communities
ABSTRACT This paper explores neighborhood-built environment features related to ‘better than expected’ and ‘as expected’ early childhood development outcomes (ECD) in 14 Australian disadvantaged communities. This paper draws from mixed methods data collected in the Kids in Communities Study – an Australian investigation of community effects on ECD – in communities across five states and territories. In total, 93 interviews and 30 focus groups were conducted with service providers and parents, and geographic information systems were used to create built environment measures for each local community. Housing factors (e.g. better affordability, tenure, less high-density public housing) were consistently related to disadvantaged local communities with ‘better than expected’ ECD outcomes. Physical access to services and public transport, living in a walkable area, having high-quality public open space, and a mix of local destinations was perceived to be consistently important by community members in disadvantaged communities regardless of ECD outcomes. Findings may help policymakers to consider neighborhood features that contribute to better ECD outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信