{"title":"音乐制作的社会神经科学模型开始于一个可疑的笔记:评论格林伯格等人(2021)。","authors":"A. Cohen, I. Neumann","doi":"10.1037/amp0000973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Group singing and music-making behaviors that were rapidly adapted to the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic context suggest to Greenberg et al. (2021) not only a musical solution to pandemic-related social isolation but also the importance of the social neuroscientific side of music. They propose a model of the social neuroscience of music production premised on the view that group singing leads to increased levels of oxytocin (a neuropeptide associated with empathy and social bonding), citing data of Schladt et al. (2017) and Keeler et al. (2015) as support. The present commentary points out that Schladt et al. reported a decrease rather than an increase in oxytocin level following group singing. Further, reference to the work by Keeler et al. (2015) is only partially accurate, and evidence contrary to the oxytocin premise is ignored. Similar inaccuracy is associated with claims for cortisol, another primary component of their model. While the authors are applauded for directing attention to both the social neuroscience of music and the value of group singing, tempering the stated premises associated with the oxytocin and cortisol channels of the model is recommended. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":217617,"journal":{"name":"The American psychologist","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A model for the social neuroscience of music production begins on a dubious note: Commentary on Greenberg et al. (2021).\",\"authors\":\"A. Cohen, I. Neumann\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/amp0000973\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Group singing and music-making behaviors that were rapidly adapted to the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic context suggest to Greenberg et al. (2021) not only a musical solution to pandemic-related social isolation but also the importance of the social neuroscientific side of music. They propose a model of the social neuroscience of music production premised on the view that group singing leads to increased levels of oxytocin (a neuropeptide associated with empathy and social bonding), citing data of Schladt et al. (2017) and Keeler et al. (2015) as support. The present commentary points out that Schladt et al. reported a decrease rather than an increase in oxytocin level following group singing. Further, reference to the work by Keeler et al. (2015) is only partially accurate, and evidence contrary to the oxytocin premise is ignored. Similar inaccuracy is associated with claims for cortisol, another primary component of their model. While the authors are applauded for directing attention to both the social neuroscience of music and the value of group singing, tempering the stated premises associated with the oxytocin and cortisol channels of the model is recommended. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).\",\"PeriodicalId\":217617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The American psychologist\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The American psychologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000973\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American psychologist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000973","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
格林伯格等人(2021)认为,迅速适应冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行背景的集体唱歌和音乐制作行为不仅表明了与大流行相关的社会隔离的音乐解决方案,而且还表明了音乐的社会神经科学方面的重要性。他们提出了一个音乐制作的社会神经科学模型,其前提是集体唱歌会导致催产素(一种与同理心和社会联系相关的神经肽)水平的提高,并引用了Schladt等人(2017)和Keeler等人(2015)的数据作为支持。目前的评论指出,Schladt等人报道了集体歌唱后催产素水平的下降而不是增加。此外,参考Keeler等人(2015)的工作只是部分准确,并且忽略了与催产素前提相反的证据。类似的不准确性与皮质醇的说法有关,皮质醇是他们模型的另一个主要组成部分。虽然作者因将注意力集中在音乐的社会神经科学和集体歌唱的价值上而受到称赞,但建议对模型中与催产素和皮质醇通道相关的既定前提进行调整。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA,版权所有)。
A model for the social neuroscience of music production begins on a dubious note: Commentary on Greenberg et al. (2021).
Group singing and music-making behaviors that were rapidly adapted to the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic context suggest to Greenberg et al. (2021) not only a musical solution to pandemic-related social isolation but also the importance of the social neuroscientific side of music. They propose a model of the social neuroscience of music production premised on the view that group singing leads to increased levels of oxytocin (a neuropeptide associated with empathy and social bonding), citing data of Schladt et al. (2017) and Keeler et al. (2015) as support. The present commentary points out that Schladt et al. reported a decrease rather than an increase in oxytocin level following group singing. Further, reference to the work by Keeler et al. (2015) is only partially accurate, and evidence contrary to the oxytocin premise is ignored. Similar inaccuracy is associated with claims for cortisol, another primary component of their model. While the authors are applauded for directing attention to both the social neuroscience of music and the value of group singing, tempering the stated premises associated with the oxytocin and cortisol channels of the model is recommended. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).