{"title":"CHI会议评审过程:撰写和解释论文评审","authors":"W. Mackay","doi":"10.1145/286498.286841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION The CHI technical program has a very thorough apld somewhat complex review process. Every year, a pool of over 1000 reviewers provide an average of eight reviews for 350 or more technical papers. A group of 30-40 associate chairs read and interpret these reviews and write a metareview for each paper. The associate chairs then discuss each paper at the technical program committee meeting, weighing the quantitative and qualitative evaluations of the reviewers, and make the final selection for the conference.","PeriodicalId":153619,"journal":{"name":"CHI 98 Conference Summary on Human Factors in Computing Systems","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The CHI conference review process: writing and interpreting paper reviews\",\"authors\":\"W. Mackay\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/286498.286841\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION The CHI technical program has a very thorough apld somewhat complex review process. Every year, a pool of over 1000 reviewers provide an average of eight reviews for 350 or more technical papers. A group of 30-40 associate chairs read and interpret these reviews and write a metareview for each paper. The associate chairs then discuss each paper at the technical program committee meeting, weighing the quantitative and qualitative evaluations of the reviewers, and make the final selection for the conference.\",\"PeriodicalId\":153619,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CHI 98 Conference Summary on Human Factors in Computing Systems\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CHI 98 Conference Summary on Human Factors in Computing Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/286498.286841\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CHI 98 Conference Summary on Human Factors in Computing Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/286498.286841","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The CHI conference review process: writing and interpreting paper reviews
INTRODUCTION The CHI technical program has a very thorough apld somewhat complex review process. Every year, a pool of over 1000 reviewers provide an average of eight reviews for 350 or more technical papers. A group of 30-40 associate chairs read and interpret these reviews and write a metareview for each paper. The associate chairs then discuss each paper at the technical program committee meeting, weighing the quantitative and qualitative evaluations of the reviewers, and make the final selection for the conference.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
