基于轻量级分组密码的PRNG统计检验

2017 11th International Conference on Telecommunication Systems Services and Applications (TSSA) Pub Date : 2017-10-01 DOI:10.1109/TSSA.2017.8272925

Y. S. S. Risqi, Susila Windarta

{"title":"基于轻量级分组密码的PRNG统计检验","authors":"Y. S. S. Risqi, Susila Windarta","doi":"10.1109/TSSA.2017.8272925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, a comparison of three Pseudo Random Number Generator (PRNG) based on SIMON-64, SPECK-64 and SIMECK-64 using PGV-5 scheme is presented. We use NIST randomness test suites sts-2.1.1 which consists of 15 statistical tests. According to the test results, SIMON-64-PGV-5 and SIMECK-64-PGV-5 PRNG pass all tests but SPECK-64-PGV-5 PRNG does not pass Random Excursions test. SIMON-64-PGV-5 and SIMECK-64-PGV-5 PRNG have good randomness properties.","PeriodicalId":271883,"journal":{"name":"2017 11th International Conference on Telecommunication Systems Services and Applications (TSSA)","volume":"215 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Statistical test on lightweight block cipher-based PRNG\",\"authors\":\"Y. S. S. Risqi, Susila Windarta\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TSSA.2017.8272925\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, a comparison of three Pseudo Random Number Generator (PRNG) based on SIMON-64, SPECK-64 and SIMECK-64 using PGV-5 scheme is presented. We use NIST randomness test suites sts-2.1.1 which consists of 15 statistical tests. According to the test results, SIMON-64-PGV-5 and SIMECK-64-PGV-5 PRNG pass all tests but SPECK-64-PGV-5 PRNG does not pass Random Excursions test. SIMON-64-PGV-5 and SIMECK-64-PGV-5 PRNG have good randomness properties.\",\"PeriodicalId\":271883,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 11th International Conference on Telecommunication Systems Services and Applications (TSSA)\",\"volume\":\"215 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 11th International Conference on Telecommunication Systems Services and Applications (TSSA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/TSSA.2017.8272925\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 11th International Conference on Telecommunication Systems Services and Applications (TSSA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TSSA.2017.8272925","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 6

摘要

本文对基于PGV-5方案的SIMON-64、SPECK-64和SIMECK-64三种伪随机数发生器(PRNG)进行了比较。我们使用NIST随机测试套件sts-2.1.1，包含15个统计测试。测试结果显示，SIMON-64-PGV-5和SIMECK-64-PGV-5 PRNG均通过测试，而SPECK-64-PGV-5 PRNG未通过Random Excursions测试。SIMON-64-PGV-5和SIMECK-64-PGV-5 PRNG具有良好的随机性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Statistical test on lightweight block cipher-based PRNG

In this paper, a comparison of three Pseudo Random Number Generator (PRNG) based on SIMON-64, SPECK-64 and SIMECK-64 using PGV-5 scheme is presented. We use NIST randomness test suites sts-2.1.1 which consists of 15 statistical tests. According to the test results, SIMON-64-PGV-5 and SIMECK-64-PGV-5 PRNG pass all tests but SPECK-64-PGV-5 PRNG does not pass Random Excursions test. SIMON-64-PGV-5 and SIMECK-64-PGV-5 PRNG have good randomness properties.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

2017 11th International Conference on Telecommunication Systems Services and Applications (TSSA)

自引率

0.00%

发文量